Rebecca Francis posing next to a dead giraffe (pics) (rage)

[ryantatarniuk]

This bish makes my blood boil

I absolutely HATE trophy hunters. Nothing gets me going more than this chit



inb4 con******* trophy hunters

[BigBalledBuddha]

This is new and very exciting

[Marronis]

Wtf why? Stupid bitch, whats the point

[Masterbetaa]

4/10 at best

[ryantatarniuk]

This is new and very exciting

New to me, and I'm on the misc for several hours a day

[k1ckstand]

Agreed OP.

Did you know giraffes were probably common targets for hunters throughout Africa. Different parts of their bodies were used for different purposes. Their meat was used for food. The tail hairs served as flyswatters, bracelets, necklaces and thread. Shields, sandals and drums were made using the skin, and the strings of musical instruments were from the tendons. The smoke from burning giraffe skins was used by the medicine men of Buganda to treat nose bleeds. The Humr people of Sudan consume the drink Umm Nyolokh; which is created from the liver and marrow of giraffes. Umm Nyolokh often contains DMT and other psychoactive substances from plants the giraffes eat such as Acacia; and is known to cause hallucinations of giraffes, believed to be the giraffes' ghosts by the Humr. In the 19th century, European explorers began to hunt them for sport. Habitat destruction has hurt the giraffe, too: in the Sahel, the need for firewood and grazing room for livestock has led to deforestation. Normally, giraffes can coexist with livestock, since they do not directly compete with them.

The giraffe species as a whole is assessed as Least Concern from a conservation perspective by the IUCN, as it is still numerous. However, giraffes have been extirpated from much of their historic range including Eritrea, Guinea, Mauritania and Senegal. They may also have disappeared from Angola, Mali, and Nigeria, but have been introduced to Rwanda and Swaziland. Two subspecies, the West African giraffe and the Rothschild giraffe, have been classified as Endangered, as wild populations of each of them number in the hundreds.


obviously copied from wiki

[Purostaff]

[walshyn93]

Hunting and poaching are not the same thing, *******s. Hunting is limited in such a way as to help the species. Killing a 14 year old lion that will never reproduce and will just eat up all the food for the rest of the population is good for the species. So is the 100k dollars the hunter paid to the conservation effort to fight off poachers who don't care if the animal they kill is able to reproduce or not.

If hunting a certain animal harmed the species it would be illegal, simple as.

And if you're worried about people killing animals for sport and not food, just relax. Sport makes up for maybe 0.0000000000001% of all animal kills.

In the time it took me to write this a whole football field full of chickens was probably slaughtered and none of you care.

[EnderG60]

How about you get over it and try enjoying your own life.

Not like your going to change anything.

[ally0urbase]

Please change the thread title. We don't want to know this kunts name, and she should be erased from history.

[Sapporo]

Killing a 14 year old lion that will never reproduce and will just eat up all the food for the rest of the population is good for the species.

I don't even know how lions survived before man invented the gun.

[woody19]

Jokes on you op Giraffe Steaks are goat, that neck meat is so tender.

[suave2000]

i don't even know how lions survived before man invented the gun.

/rekt

[walshyn93]

I don't even know how lions survived before man invented the gun.

clever. We've already stolen most of their habitat, so now it's up to humans to manage their resources and that means saving as much as possible for the productive members of the species.

[MrRedz]

this bish is a piece of chit but lets be honest you are just another ******* that rage when you see stuff like this happening but you dont really care and arent trying tp help in any sort of way

[hutch6]

Hunting and poaching are not the same thing, *******s. Hunting is limited in such a way as to help the species. Killing a 14 year old lion that will never reproduce and will just eat up all the food for the rest of the population is good for the species. So is the 100k dollars the hunter paid to the conservation effort to fight off poachers who don't care if the animal they kill is able to reproduce or not.

If hunting a certain animal harmed the species it would be illegal, simple as.

Maybe so but bringing down a 2,000lb animal with a bow and arrow is not the most humane way of doing things. I guess that's the "trophy" bit in that episode of "Get My Goat".

[walshyn93]

Maybe so but bringing down a 2,000lb animal with a bow and arrow is not the most humane way of doing things. I guess that's the "trophy" bit in that episode of "Get My Goat".

Yeah, I would never trophy hunt, but people will pay big bucks to do it and the reserves need all the cash they can get. Without trophy hunting they'd have to rely on charity and government funding to fight off poachers. Crustie hippies generally aren't that forthcoming with their chequebooks.

Rickie Gervais could afford to sponsor the entire population of an endangered species to prevent them being used in trophy hunts but he prefers to make snide comments about hunters on twitter. Most of these hippies' attitudes are at odds with what's actually best for conservation efforts. Which is no surprise, female logic is rife with these lefty tards. They would rather the animals were left alone to starve than have their population carefully managed if it involves killing some of them.

[x8Pauly8x]

The planet belongs to us human! Fuk dem animals they can go fuk themselves m8. I swear to god I will hunt them all till the last ones so we humans can unify together under the same banner! The war on animals is now happening and we are winning. Insect better pepper their anguses because we are goin' in dry on them too soon.

[ryantatarniuk]

Yeah, I would never trophy hunt, but people will pay big bucks to do it and the reserves need all the cash they can get. Without trophy hunting they'd have to rely on charity and government funding to fight off poachers. Crustie hippies generally aren't that forthcoming with their chequebooks.

Rickie Gervais could afford to sponsor the entire population of an endangered species to prevent them being used in trophy hunts but he prefers to make snide comments about hunters on twitter. Most of these hippies' attitudes are at odds with what's actually best for conservation efforts. Which is no surprise, female logic is rife with these lefty tards. They would rather the animals were left alone to starve than have their population carefully managed if it involves killing some of them.

Then let the population starve. It's not our business to intervene.

[hutch6]

Yeah, I would never trophy hunt, but people will pay big bucks to do it and the reserves need all the cash they can get. Without trophy hunting they'd have to rely on charity and government funding to fight off poachers. Crustie hippies generally aren't that forthcoming with their chequebooks.

I am aware but being a hunter myself if someone put me in front of that beast and handed me a bow and arrow I'd be questioning my morals. Culling the animal my be good for its own species and their food source etc (despite removing such a vast quantity of food out of the cycle for other species but anyway) but you still have to think of the animal not suffering and I doubt that with an arrow puncture to the chest it went down straight away or within 15mins. Their heart is massive and is solid muscle. That arrow didn't look to have gone more than 12-16inches deep so the animal probably died of internal bleeding.

"Pass me that rifle my good man, there's a good chap"

[MrDeafMuscle]

New to me, and I'm on the misc for several hours a day

Yea right......

[carnivore74]

that whore must be a wild ride in bed.

[ryantatarniuk]

Yea right......

When you work a mundane office job, its not hard to be on the misc all the time

[walshyn93]

Then let the population starve. It's not our business to intervene.

Strong animal lover.

Neg comment:

nature balances itself out we don't need to kill animals to "help" them

Clearly we do. It's possible for a vulnerable or endangered species to be overpopulated if its habitat has been reduced and its food supply is running short. If all the male lions live long past their reproduction age there won't be much food left for the little cubs and the next generation will be smaller than the one before. Culling reverses that trend and allows the species to grow.

[walshyn93]

I am aware but being a hunter myself if someone put me in front of that beast and handed me a bow and arrow I'd be questioning my morals. Culling the animal my be good for its own species and their food source etc (despite removing such a vast quantity of food out of the cycle for other species but anyway) but you still have to think of the animal not suffering and I doubt that with an arrow puncture to the chest it went down straight away or within 15mins. Their heart is massive and is solid muscle. That arrow didn't look to have gone more than 12-16inches deep so the animal probably died of internal bleeding.

"Pass me that rifle my good man, there's a good chap"

That doesn't apply to apex predators for a start which is what most trophy hunting is geared towards. I agree with you on the method used, but that's not what most people are focusing on. They'd have the same reaction if she killed it instantly.

[x8Pauly8x]

that whore must be a wild ride in bed.

[thercias]

lets not rush to conclusions. what if she found it dead? what's the harm with taking a selfie with an already dead animal.

[Tinge52]

LMAO saw this guy last night! repped

[Euphorikxxx]

ryan, did you ask her if she liked daggers yet?

[PatheticPeter]

i'd let her turn my pud into an endangered species, you bros know what i'm saying?