Reply
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Registered User chuckthebasher's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2015
    Posts: 18
    Rep Power: 0
    chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100)
    chuckthebasher is offline

    Sugar does not make you fat

    Sugar itself cannot make you fat. Consuming too many calories is what makes you fat. I have yet to see one study that proves an increase of sugar intake when eating at maintenance calories will cause weight gain.

    While there are many studies showing an increase in sugar intake will lead to weight gain, these results are due to the increase in calories, not the sugar itself. These studies do not control for calories. An ideal study would have two groups eat at maintenance calories, with one consuming more sugar than the other. Can anybody show me a study like this?

    It is impossible to gain weight when you eat as many calories as you burn. It violates the first law of thermodynamics. There are a mountain of studies proving this:

    examine.com/faq/what-should-i-eat-for-weight-loss.html
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User usersignup2's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Posts: 6,785
    Rep Power: 18870
    usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) usersignup2 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    usersignup2 is offline
    did you make an account just to post this?
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Banned keaton10's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2012
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 30
    Posts: 1,612
    Rep Power: 0
    keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) keaton10 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    keaton10 is offline
    Being red can make you fat.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User Karn235's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: British Columbia, Canada
    Posts: 1,637
    Rep Power: 1288
    Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000) Karn235 is just really nice. (+1000)
    Karn235 is offline
    Yeah its kinda obvious, I use to eat 200g+ of sugar a day lol (fruits and icecream) still cut at the rate I wanted to
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Verified Aesthetic rhadam's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 43,399
    Rep Power: 400180
    rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    rhadam is offline
    Originally Posted by chuckthebasher View Post
    Sugar itself cannot make you fat. Consuming too many calories is what makes you fat. I have yet to see one study that proves an increase of sugar intake when eating at maintenance calories will cause weight gain.

    While there are many studies showing an increase in sugar intake will lead to weight gain, these results are due to the increase in calories, not the sugar itself. These studies do not control for calories. An ideal study would have two groups eat at maintenance calories, with one consuming more sugar than the other. Can anybody show me a study like this?

    It is impossible to gain weight when you eat as many calories as you burn. It violates the first law of thermodynamics. There are a mountain of studies proving this:

    examine.com/faq/what-should-i-eat-for-weight-loss.html
    Hey cool story, what are you going to tell us next, man lands on moon? Water is wet? Gravity exists?
    Psych & handcuffs
    Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
    House, Techno, and 4Runners
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User chuckthebasher's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2015
    Posts: 18
    Rep Power: 0
    chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100) chuckthebasher is not very well liked. (-100)
    chuckthebasher is offline
    Originally Posted by rhadam View Post
    Hey cool story, what are you going to tell us next, man lands on moon? Water is wet? Gravity exists?
    That's a good idea actually, I might post that in the misc section.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    LIVING determined4000's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2008
    Location: United States
    Posts: 33,733
    Rep Power: 1075100
    determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz determined4000 has the mod powerz
    determined4000 is offline
    would still say Americans (especially) are fat due to eating foods that are highly processed and get addicted to high sugar products (cereals, desserts, snack food) that contribute to their overweight issues and obesity
    your sugar should be coming from fruits, dairy, etc. in terms of healthy diet options and controlling weight and getting quality nutrients
    Founder of MMDELAD
    "Micros Matter Dont Eat Like A Dumba**" (hydrogenated oils, shortening, mono and di-glycerides don't fit in my macros)

    Does Not Count Macros Crew

    "Think in terms of limits and the result is limitation
    Think in terms of progress and the result is progression"

    my day:http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=156294333

    Training Philosophy to be strong: 1. Pick Weights up off the ground 2. Squat them 3. Push them over your head
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Moderator SuffolkPunch's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2007
    Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Posts: 54,513
    Rep Power: 1338185
    SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz
    SuffolkPunch is offline
    denovo lipogenesis can make you fat. But net fat gain still requires a calorie surplus.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    I'm gon' make it Troopashd's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2013
    Location: Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Age: 27
    Posts: 1,497
    Rep Power: 2390
    Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000) Troopashd is just really nice. (+1000)
    Troopashd is offline
    Met:
    Ronnie Coleman
    Hodgetwins

    Bench: 260
    Squat: 475
    Dead: 433
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    πŸ…ΎπŸ…ΌπŸ…΄πŸ…ΆπŸ…° πŸ††πŸ…΄πŸ…°πŸ…ΏπŸ…ΎπŸ…½ EjnarKolinkar's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2009
    Posts: 20,778
    Rep Power: 132752
    EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) EjnarKolinkar has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    EjnarKolinkar is offline
    When I confused about sugar I just go read the DCA sticky topic.
    The most important aspect of weight training; whether for the athlete, bodybuilder, or average person is to better ones health and ability without injury. - Bill Pearl
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Registered User GrowMacGrow's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2013
    Posts: 899
    Rep Power: 313
    GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50) GrowMacGrow will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    GrowMacGrow is offline
    If you came out with this about 8 years ago with scientific research to back, the majority of people on here would have been amazed. Now, not so much. Try something else next time....and please don't come out with the meal frequency thing, we know that to.

    In fact, there are alot of knowledgeable people on this thread. I know you were trying to help, but this type of post could come across as insulting to some. I do assume this is why you are in the red.
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Registered User jakob1010's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2015
    Age: 25
    Posts: 12
    Rep Power: 0
    jakob1010 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    jakob1010 is offline
    Just because it doesn't make you fat doesn't mean you shouldn't focus on calorie quality. All calories are not created equal. 800 calories is 800 calories you might say?? 800 calories of Gingerbread cookies and 800 calories of chicken aren't going to fuel you the same way...
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Verified Aesthetic rhadam's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 43,399
    Rep Power: 400180
    rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) rhadam has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    rhadam is offline
    Originally Posted by jakob1010 View Post
    Just because it doesn't make you fat doesn't mean you shouldn't focus on calorie quality. All calories are not created equal. 800 calories is 800 calories you might say?? 800 calories of Gingerbread cookies and 800 calories of chicken aren't going to fuel you the same way...
    That's not an accurate comparison for our purposes. A better comparison would be 100g rice compared to 100g skittles. Or 100g bread vs 100g dextrose. Quality of food sources does matter for energy balance, less for body composition (within reason).
    Psych & handcuffs
    Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
    House, Techno, and 4Runners
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    Registered User Jason265's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2010
    Age: 33
    Posts: 2,579
    Rep Power: 3302
    Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Jason265 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Jason265 is offline
    Originally Posted by chuckthebasher View Post
    Sugar itself cannot make you fat. Consuming too many calories is what makes you fat. I have yet to see one study that proves an increase of sugar intake when eating at maintenance calories will cause weight gain.

    While there are many studies showing an increase in sugar intake will lead to weight gain, these results are due to the increase in calories, not the sugar itself. These studies do not control for calories. An ideal study would have two groups eat at maintenance calories, with one consuming more sugar than the other. Can anybody show me a study like this?

    It is impossible to gain weight when you eat as many calories as you burn. It violates the first law of thermodynamics. There are a mountain of studies proving this:

    examine.com/faq/what-should-i-eat-for-weight-loss.html
    There probably aren't a lot of studies because it DOES NOT PHUCKING MATTER! Only the most anal people in the world count calories (and all of them post on this site). All that matters to the rest of humanity is what causes you to gain weight and what doesn't when you use your body's natural hunger/weight adjusting systems.

    One thing a lot of studies do take into account that ALSO DOES NOT PHUCKING MATTER is caloric density. It doesn't matter. People only think it does because most of the things that are caloricly dense are also bad for you and cause you to over-eat. As an example, if you are adjusted to a high fat diet (no longer craving carbs), you can get full off a few spoonfuls of ghee or coconut oil because density does not matter. Also, if you fill yourself to the brim with plain lettuce, you will feel stuffed but still want to eat more of something else. You're body is smart enough to figure out how many calories are there and how many it needs.
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    04/28/2026 hammerfelt's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Posts: 7,092
    Rep Power: 23404
    hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) hammerfelt has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    hammerfelt is offline
    Just follow this commercial OP and you be swell.

    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Sugar and its relation with fat
    By AdriGz in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-13-2013, 04:30 AM
  2. Fruit - Does it Make You Fat!?
    By Vallataa in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 09-13-2012, 03:46 PM
  3. Replies: 93
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 07:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts