college student speaks his mind…gets banned (jimmies)

[Ted Nugent]

Liberal America: where raising justified questions that don't support the feminist propaganda gets you banned from college courses and chastised

#triggered
#yesallwomen

But it was his questioning of the widely shared and often debated statistic that 1 in 5 women in college are sexually assaulted — it doesn’t serve “actual rape victims” to “overinflate” numbers, he said — and his rejection of the term “rape culture” that led to him being banned, he said.

“I simply questioned the statistics,” he said. “I understand [Savery] has to take care of his students, but I have to take care of my education.”

******* professor says to him:

“The entire conference without exception, men as well as women, feel that your presence makes them uncomfortable enough that they would rather not be there if you are there, and they have said that things you have said in our conference have made them so upset that they have difficulty concentrating in other classes. I, as conference leader, have to do what is best for the well-being of the entire class, and I am therefore banning you from conference for the remainder of the semester.”

http://www.buzzfeed.com/katiejmbaker...-r#.dybMOJN3wX


got the next few days off, gonna have a few drinks and write a scathing letter and send it to everyone on that ******* ass colleges contact page. will rep any miscers who do the same srs.

[Winter52]

I knew I would get rustled when I saw the title.. fuk

[JohnyyBravo]

holy fk...

the fb comments there ruslted my jimmis even more, don't read it brahs....im legit fkin mad as fk right now

[SwissRicola]

read that article got super rustled

fun fact: if you factor in prison rapes, substantially more men are raped than women

if you want to hold on to your jimmies dont read the comment section

[4everalone]

Was this a feminist college or something? Hope so. If not then my jimmies are severely rustled

[rjw99]

even if he was wrong, who was freedom of speech? what was debate? strong freedom of speech

[Ted Nugent]

Was this a feminist college or something? Hope so. If not then my jimmies are severely rustled

small liberal arts school in Portland, so yes, about as beta ******* of a place as you can get

[Vexidi]

They only value your free speech and questioning of authority if it goes along with their fruitcake lefty agenda.

[Nicklol]

dont read the buzzfeed comments... they are thinking the exact opposite of us...

they think hes the bad guy LMAO!!!

[Jasonw1178]

Because he made other students UPSET and felt UNCOMFORTABLE they are banning him..... little thin skinned wimps need to realize that in life there are going to be a lot of people who offend you and make you uncomfortable. DEAL WITH IT.

[Ted Nugent]

even if he was wrong, who was freedom of speech? what was debate? strong freedom of speech

it sounds like he was debating the actual statistics and ridiculous inflation of the matter, not just being like "hurr durr misogyny"

but apparently free speech in an open forum class and factual data doesnt trump #triggered

[CitizenVagrant]

Enjoy the subsequent ELL suit.

Atty fees starting at about $180 / hr

[moviebrah]

This statistic has been heavily disputed for years. Instead of banning him from the conference they could have just presented further empirical evidence to justify their claims. Obviously when they can't defend themselves then they just pull the feminazi card. This chit came out back in 2011 and it was a telephone survey.

[midcoastking33]

to play devil's advocate the kid seemed like he's just doing it to be contrarian and rustle jims even if his logic is sound

[BUDDED]

Ridiculous.

[Trogdor27]

its the fall of rome all over again. sike beta ass americas empire was poverty as fuk.

[Trogdor27]

to play devil's advocate the kid seemed like he's just doing it to be contrarian and rustle jims even if his logic is sound

[eightduece]

a bunch of whiny, over privileged, stuck in their own bubble autists. I hope they all can't find a job with their women's study degree, end up living with a roommate until they're 30 in a one bedroom, and die lonely and bitter.

[AlacrityH]

This is why feminism is a cult. They have no tolerance. Just like religion. Phuck this sht.

[MrVeggie]

comments are 10000x worse than the article. Cant believe people are this fkin stupid lmao

[midcoastking33]

its the fall of rome all over again. sike beta ass americas empire was poverty as fuk.

pot meet kettle

[Tony_S]

we really need to kill this culture of caring because some pathetic fuk feels offended


fuk you and your sensitive feelings

[Ted Nugent]

to play devil's advocate the kid seemed like he's just doing it to be contrarian and rustle jims even if his logic is sound

the entire spirit and origin of college is people presenting different ideas amongst their peers. he shouldnt be banned for speaking his mind and ******* kunts couldnt handle it. he didnt threaten anyone or do anything illegal, hope he sues the fuk out of them

[Ratfish]

lmao.

i work near there and walked my dog through the campus 10 minutes ago

[AlacrityH]

Always remember this.

Unfortunately, feminism and future is an oxymoron (or fortunately, depending on your point-of-view), as it seems to be unsustainable on the long run.

Based on past history, it appears that a civilization that embraces feminist values will cease to exist in just a few centuries. This is why we have never seen a feminist civilization aside from very short spans at the end of the Roman empire and possibly a few other more ancient civilizations.

Reading the history of the Roman Empire brings such glaring similarities with our own civilization, it is as if human social dynamics are literally stuck in a cycle that repeats every couple thousand years (there were two matriarchical, extremely advanced civilizations: one at the end of the Roman empire, 2000 years ago, one possibly at the end of Babylon, 4000 years ago).

For those who enjoy history, here is a short recap of social changes in Rome, 2 millenia ago (most historians focus on military and political facts, but I find the social aspects just as fascinating):

~5 century BC: Roman civilization is a a strong patriarchy, fathers are liable for the actions of their wife and children, and have absolute authority over the family (including the power of life and death)
~1 century BC: Roman civilization blossoms into the most powerful and advanced civilization in the world. Material wealth is astounding, citizens (i.e.: non slaves) do not need to work. They have running water, baths and import spices from thousands of miles away. The Romans enjoy the arts and philosophy; they know and appreciate democracy, commerce, science, human rights, animal rights, children rights and women become emancipated. No-fault divorce is enacted, and quickly becomes popular by the end of the century.
~1-2 century AD: The family unit is destroyed. Men refuse to marry and the government tries to revive marriage with a “bachelor tax”, to no avail. Children are growing up without fathers, Roman women show little interest in raising their own children and frequently use nannies. The wealth and power of women grows very fast, while men become increasingly demotivated and engage in prostitution and vice. Prostitution and homosexuality become widespread.
~3-4 century AD: A moral and demographic collapse takes place, Roman population declines due to below-replacement birth-rate. Vice and massive corruption are rampant, while the new-born Catholic Religion is gaining power (it becomes the religion of the Empire in 380 AD). There is extreme economic, political and military instability: there are 25 successive emperors in half a century (many end up assassinated), the Empire is ungovernable and on the brink of civil war.
~5 century AD: The Empire is ruled by an elite of military men that use the Emperor as a puppet; due to massive debts and financial problems, the Empire cannot afford to hire foreign mercenaries to defend itself (Roman citizens have long ago being replaced by mercenaries in the army), and starts “selling” parts of the Empire in exchange for protection. Eventually, the mercenaries figure out that the “Emperor has no clothes”, and overrun and pillage the Empire.
humanity falls back into the Bronze Age (think: eating squirrel meat and living in a cave); 12 centuries of religious zilotry (The Great Inquisition, Crusades) and intellectual darkness follow: science, commerce, philosophy, human rights become unknown concepts until they are rediscovered again during the Age of Enlightenment in 17th century AD.

Regarding the Babylonian civilization (~2,000 BC), we have relatively few records, but we do know that they had a very advanced civilization because we found their legislative code written down on stone tablets (yes, they had laws and tribunals, and some of today’s commercial code can even be traced back to Babylonian law). They had child support laws (which seems to indicate that there was a family breakdown), and they collapsed presumably due to a “moral breakdown” figuratively represented in the Bible as the “Tower of Babel” (which was inspired by a real tower). Interesting and controversial anecdote: some claim that the Roman Catholic Religion is nothing more than a rewriting and adaptation of an ancient Babylonian religion!

[Gringo12]

Fckn lol

Is America srs?

[Trogdor27]

pot meet kettle

what does that even mean stupid ****ing reject go eat a used tampon wrapped in razor wire

[BrahPlease]

So if everyone isnt exactly the same at the conference, you get banned?

[Ted Nugent]

So if everyone isnt exactly the same at the conference, you get banned?

apparently if you raise questions that make people uncomfortable its a "get kicked out" worthy offense

[LN11]

Got banned off University Paper ******** page for schooling Femminazis and overly PC liberals in a relentless tirade.