the level of retard in this thread is amazing
answer is 9. multiply from left to right
threads like these separate normal people from bull blown idiots
|
Thread: 6÷2(2+1)=
-
03-05-2015, 07:45 PM #121
-
03-05-2015, 07:46 PM #122
-
03-05-2015, 07:47 PM #123
-
03-05-2015, 07:48 PM #124
As I understand it, ÷ represents everything to the left of it being divided by everything to the right, while / represents what is immediately to the left divided by what's immediately to the right.
Haven't been on a TI in a while, but are there both ÷ and /? Or just one of them?PR's:
DL 355
SQ 275
BP 195
-
-
03-05-2015, 07:48 PM #125
-
03-05-2015, 07:49 PM #126
answer from a doctorate in maths.
The problem as it is written is 6÷2(1+2) , the ÷ cannot be substituted with a fraction bar because they have different ranks on the order of operations. It is an illegal math move to do this. The bar ranks with parentheses, ÷ is interchangeable with *. therefore the problem must be solved as 6÷2(1+2) NOT 6 (over) 2(1+2) we do the parentheses first, so 6÷2(3), the parentheses are now no longer relevant, because the number inside is in it's simplest form. Every single number has implied parentheses around it.
6÷2(3)
(6) ÷(2)(3)
6÷2*3,
or even converting the division to multiplication by a reciprocal (a legal math move)
(6)(1 (over) 2)(3)
are all correct ways to write this problem and mean exactly the same thing. Using pemdas, where md and as are interchangeable, we work from left to right, so (3)(3) or
3*3= 9
source: *****://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110427155042AACb7d8
-
03-05-2015, 07:49 PM #127
-
03-05-2015, 07:50 PM #128
-
-
03-05-2015, 07:51 PM #129
-
03-05-2015, 07:51 PM #130
While I still stand by my original assertion the way the problem is written/presented is ambiguous for modern math, I found this an interesting read for you math nerds.
http://www.matthewcompher.com/posts/...symbol-%C3%B7/
"At any rate, the obelus is introduced to represent division on page 8. Previously, the obelus had been used to mark ancient manuscripts that were believed to be corrupt. As it is used in Teutsche Algebra, however, was the first time it is used in a more modern sense. There are pages of sample uses for division and all of them are analogous to how it used today. This is the first known use of the obelus to represent division.
Things get interesting on page 76, however, when the following assertion is made:"
So in that case the answer would be 1.
-
03-05-2015, 07:51 PM #131
-
03-05-2015, 07:53 PM #132
just one. You are right though that's what ÷ was originally intended for back in the 1800's but it's devolved into "/" now a days. Things change over time. Like i said it's all semantics. Some people interpret the obelus as you stated while others interpret it as"/". I prefer to leave the ambiguity out of it and just use parentheses to clearly state how the problem should be solved. I've never used the obelus in engineering.
ಠ_ಠ
<|>
/ω\
-
-
03-05-2015, 07:56 PM #133
-
03-05-2015, 07:57 PM #134
-
03-05-2015, 07:58 PM #135
-
03-05-2015, 07:58 PM #136
-
-
03-05-2015, 07:59 PM #137
-
03-05-2015, 08:01 PM #138
Dont matter how you write it bro.
The answer is still 1
Being a fraction has nothing to do with the order. Your definition of a fraction is wrong also. A fraction is a number that is less than 1...
6÷2 is not a fraction
6/2 is not a fraction
The better saying is "does 6÷ 2 PRODUCE a fraction." An that answer is no it does not. 6/2 = 3 which is not less than 1 therefore it is not a fraction.To be continued....
-
03-05-2015, 08:02 PM #139
-
03-05-2015, 08:03 PM #140
-
-
03-05-2015, 08:03 PM #141
Egotistical miscers always assume the question is written in American numbers.
The internet is worldwide these days. Maybe the question is in metric and the answer is indeed 1. Maybe it's using the Kansas system and the answer is Jesus or the answer is taco because it's a Mexican equation. Fuk, wake up! It's not all about you.
-
03-05-2015, 08:06 PM #142
-
03-05-2015, 08:06 PM #143
-
03-05-2015, 08:06 PM #144
-
-
03-05-2015, 08:07 PM #145
-
03-05-2015, 08:08 PM #146
-
03-05-2015, 08:09 PM #147
-
03-05-2015, 08:10 PM #148
-
-
03-05-2015, 08:14 PM #149
-
03-05-2015, 08:17 PM #150
Similar Threads
-
People who thinks 6/2(1+2) =1, GTFIH
By eXtine in forum Misc.Replies: 163Last Post: 07-12-2012, 06:15 AM -
proof that 6÷2(1+2) = 1
By efran1234 in forum Misc.Replies: 109Last Post: 07-09-2012, 05:37 AM
Bookmarks