http://www.engadget.com/2015/02/26/fcc-net-neutrality/
inb4 people who have absolutely zero understanding of the issue knee jerk to their classic "but teh gubmint!"“This is no more a plan to regulate the Internet than the First Amendment is a plan to regulate free speech."
-Chairman Wheeler.
|
-
02-26-2015, 12:49 PM #1
- Join Date: May 2006
- Location: Colorado, United States
- Posts: 15,781
- Rep Power: 111179
Net Neutrality passes. FCC approval is done.
Never criticize someone until you have walked a mile in their shoes. That way, when you do criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
Packer Nation
-
02-26-2015, 12:54 PM #2
-
02-26-2015, 12:55 PM #3
-
02-26-2015, 12:58 PM #4
-
-
02-26-2015, 01:07 PM #5
Dude, dont even try to explain. I made the mistake of trying to explain the technical issues in this thread: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...6533281&page=6
Evidently they believe that due to net neutrality:
1) "If Jamal in the inner city or Cleetus on the back 40 can't get 50mb/s for $30 a month you're going to have to pay for it."
-
02-26-2015, 01:08 PM #6
-
02-26-2015, 01:11 PM #7
-
02-26-2015, 01:14 PM #8
-
-
02-26-2015, 01:19 PM #9
-
02-26-2015, 01:19 PM #10
I think the Americans opposed to net neutrality have never set foot outside of the US in their lives.
Like seriously your internet infrastructure is on par with that of other developed counters............................... in the late 90s early 2000s.Het bier zal weer vloeien
In ons Gelderland
Op winst in de strijd
Op vlees en jolijt
Kom laat ons nu drinken
Op ons Gelderland
-
02-26-2015, 01:22 PM #11
-
02-26-2015, 01:25 PM #12
This isn't going to make it more easier for ISP's to compete with each other. It isn't going to increase speeds, it isn't going to make better customer service. The problem with America's internet is that we have no competition from over regulation of broadband services. This ruling does absolutely nothing to promote competition or remove red tape.
Congratulations, you might not get throttled(maybe) but you can now enjoy 15 Mbps internet from Comcast, Verizon or AT&T for more money.
-
-
02-26-2015, 01:25 PM #13
-
02-26-2015, 01:35 PM #14
-
02-26-2015, 01:36 PM #15
Post speedtest and how much you pay
http://www.speedtest.net/Het bier zal weer vloeien
In ons Gelderland
Op winst in de strijd
Op vlees en jolijt
Kom laat ons nu drinken
Op ons Gelderland
-
02-26-2015, 01:38 PM #16
Sorry I really thought you were being obtuse. WSJ has an excellent video explaining it:
http://www.wsj.com/video/net-neutral...0CE25E64D.html
Their analogy with fedex is spot on. Say for example YOU pay for 2nd day shipping to have a product delivered. However Fedex sees the package is from Amazon, so they purposely deliver the package late. YOU paid for 2nd day delivery.
FedEx continues to deliver Amazon packages later and later. Until finally Amazon pays Fedex money to deliver their packages on time. Keep in mind...YOU paid for the 2nd day delivery charge.
In this case the delivery charge is your broadband fee. You pay $45 to comcast to provide a 10mbit service with a 250GB data cap. Once you reach that datacap, doesnt matter if its netflix, pornhub, whatever, Comcast can cut you off.
Instead what comcast did was slow down Netflix to ruin your customer experience with netflix. You already paid for the bandwidth and data. Since netflix became choppy, you call netflix to complain. After a while, netflix got so many complaints, the paid a fee to Comcast to have the throttle removed.
in the Verizon case, Netflix paid the fee, then Verizon throttled it again. Thats when the FCC became involved.
-
-
02-26-2015, 01:38 PM #17
-
02-26-2015, 01:39 PM #18
-
02-26-2015, 01:41 PM #19
-
02-26-2015, 01:46 PM #20
-
-
02-26-2015, 01:49 PM #21
Believe it has to go through congress.
Best believe FCC is going to be facing lawsuits by the corporations.أشهد أن لا إله إلاَّ الله و أشهد أن محمد رسول الله
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🚷 Anti-Degeneracy League 🚷
https://www.twitter.com/eyeonpalestine
Mossad acronym: ISIS AKA Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
-
02-26-2015, 01:50 PM #22
-
02-26-2015, 01:51 PM #23
-
02-26-2015, 01:52 PM #24
-
-
02-26-2015, 01:54 PM #25
-
02-26-2015, 01:56 PM #26
I believe part of the problem is the debate over net neutrality was not explained properly by either side. Up until recently most of the companies had voluntary peering agreements.
One thing that should be noted: Netflix was paying Level 3 to route their traffic. Level 3 had purchased transit from Comcast. Early last year, Comcast slowed all Netflix traffic going over the Level 3 transit. Then approached Netflix and said: Route your traffic directly with us, pay us an additional fee and we will treat your traffic equally. Netflix finally agreed, however they were still on the hook for the level 3 contract.
The Verizon case was different. There is a large volume of evidence they have continued to slow netflix traffic even after Netflix paid a fee to have their traffic treated equally. <--- That triggered the FCC intervention due to many industry experts raising the alarm that this type of behavior could cripple peering agreements.
Comcast has been the most vocal about Net Neutrality because their non-compete clause they signed when they purchased NBC expires 2018. That clause forbids Comcast from expediting NBC streaming traffic. Without NN, after 2018, it was Comcasts intention to throttle competitors traffic while expediting NBC streaming traffic.
-
02-26-2015, 01:57 PM #27
-
02-26-2015, 02:40 PM #28
Meanwhile in reality the technology and internet community applauds the decision. One step closer to the internet we need. Neutral, free from censorship and open access to all.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/26/81...ernet-title-ii
http://www.wired.com/2015/02/fcc-vot...et-neutrality/
I swear some people here would have raised hell about the bill of rights back in the day.
-
-
02-26-2015, 02:48 PM #29
-
02-26-2015, 02:57 PM #30
The gov't and those paying ISPs for fast lanes took your fears of some consumer unfriendly companies (telecoms), spun a tale into a hypothetical reality and sold it to you so they could anoint themselves more power and line their own pockets.
Not only did eat it right up, you defended them doing it.
And the ironic thing is, telecoms didn't even fight because with this framework in place, you just cemented them as monopolies.
Bravo!
Bookmarks