BREAKING NEWS: Taliban shoot dead 84 children.

[vvvaaa]

Pakistan going ham on the Taliban right now. Let's hope it will last and we won't see ISI back to supporting the Taliban full time in half a year.

[michiganiron19]

But Hillary says we should empathize with our enemies.

[heeheehaahaa]

Some vile ****s ITT. Never disappoint with your bile on tragic occasions like these. The children were Muslim too, then why would you label their killers by religion?
Oh right, because you are twisted ****jobs who will use any excuse to bash muslims, regards of it making sense or not. Nice job excusing yourselves of creating Taliban, nurturing them, declaring war on them and blackmailing Pakistan into fighting them too. The war on terror is certainly not to blame here.

lol brits

religion of kissing ass of the "religion of peace".

bet you can't wait to donate your daughters right nigel

[faisji]

Pakistan hangs 2 militants in the first hangings since 2008.4 more to be executed .

InB4 EU/Libtarts impose trade sanctions for "murdering" those swine.

[CynicalAtheist]

Have the attacks ceased? What's the toll so far?

[Malaki100]

Nothing new here, Islamists have been slaughtering children to wreak havoc since the days of the prophet.

[AKMuzzle]

Nothing new here, Islamists have been slaughtering children to wreak havoc since the days of the prophet.

sauce??

[Malaki100]

sauce??

Al Kitab

[CynicalAtheist]

Al Kitab

Ouch!

In before the usual muslim denial...

[AKMuzzle]

Al Kitab

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 5, Book 58, Number 148:

Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:

Some people (i.e. the Jews of Bani bin Quraiza) agreed to accept the verdict of Sad bin Muadh so the Prophet sent for him (i.e. Sad bin Muadh). He came riding a donkey, and when he approached the Mosque, the Prophet said, "Get up for the best amongst you." or said, "Get up for your chief." Then the Prophet said, "O Sad! These people have agreed to accept your verdict." Sad said, "I judge that their warriors should be killed and their children and women should be taken as captives." The Prophet said, "You have given a judgment similar to Allah's Judgment (or the King's judgment)."

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 5, Book 58, Number 148

lol check your source madam.

[Malaki100]

lol check your source madam.

Was Aisha a child when the prophet consummated the marriage? Yes or no.

[AKMuzzle]

Was Aisha a child when the prophet consummated the marriage? Yes or no.

No derailing please. Stick to the topic. We are talking about killing children here.

[faisji]

Al Kitab

LMAO at idiots referring to taliabn pigs as a educational reference but then what else is new

[Malaki100]

No derailing please. Stick to the topic. We are talking about killing children here.

The question is relevant to the discussion. Was 9 year old Aisha a child when the prophet consummated the marriage?

[Malaki100]

LMAO at idiots referring to taliabn pigs as a educational reference but then what else is new

The Taliban referenced the Quran to justify slaughtering children.

[RicksenUK]

The Taliban referenced the Quran to justify slaughtering children.

Why do you wear batty rider what is it with women than leave religion and then dress like sloots.

[Malaki100]

Why do you wear batty rider what is it with women than leave religion and then dress like sloots.

[AKMuzzle]

The question is relevant to the discussion. Was 9 year old Aisha a child when the prophet consummated the marriage?

Not relevant. If you want to discuss that then make another thread.Il be more then happy to respond. HOWWEVER, you unsurprisingly posted false and forged information in response to me asking you to prove>>>>> 'slaughtering children to wreak havoc since the days of the prophet.' Thus it would be great if you could humble yourself and admit you were misinformed and wrong on this matter.

[faisji]

The Taliban referenced the Quran to justify slaughtering children.

[img]http://media0.giphy.com/media/Rhhr8D5mKSX7O/giphy.gif[/im]

No it did not stop posting like a jackass.You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.you are regurgitating/copy-pasting.

[Malaki100]

Not relevant. If you want to discuss that then make another thread.Il be more then happy to respond. HOWWEVER, you unsurprisingly posted false and forged information in response to me asking you to prove>>>>> 'slaughtering children to wreak havoc since the days of the prophet.' Thus it would be great if you could humble yourself and admit you were misinformed and wrong on this matter.

It's completely relevant because of how the prophet and his followers create their own definitions of what a child is in order to justify child abuse, rape and slaughter.

Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:

I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religiou...ud/038-sat.php

The average ages pubic hair begins to grow in males and females are 12 and 11, respectively. However, in some males and females, it has been known for pubic hair to start as early as 9 and 8, respectively.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgenic_hair

So do you consider a 9 year old a child and now do you see the relevance?

[Tekkendo]

lol check your source madam.

You posted a source saying Moh kept women and children as slaves? fukin lolz

[Tekkendo]

It's completely relevant because of how the prophet and his followers create their own definitions of what a child is in order to justify child abuse, rape and slaughter.


http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religiou...ud/038-sat.php


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgenic_hair

So do you consider a 9 year old a child and now do you see the relevance?

U pwn'ed them there.

[faisji]

100 years earlier

Simeon of Beth Arsham's Second letter preserves yet another memorably gruesome episode. After seeing her Christian kinsmen burned alive, Ruhm, a great noblewoman of Najran, brings her daughter before the Himyarite king and instructs him: "Cut off our heads, so that we may go join our brothers and my daughter's father." The executioners comply, slaughtering her daughter and granddaughter before Ruhm's eyes and forcing her to drink her blood. The king then asks, "How does your daughter's blood taste to you?" The martyr replies, "Like a pure spotless offering: that is what it tasted like in my mouth and in my soul."

So it wasnt like it was invented by Muslims

[Tekkendo]

100 years earlier




So it wasnt like it was invented by Muslims

Savages gonna savage. That was in 523 AD

Simeon of Beth Arsham
He described the massacre of Christians by Jews in the Yemen in 523AD in a contemporary letter to Simeon of Gabbula.

This is 2014. Don't see any Jew or Christian invoking something 1500 yr old to kill children.

[faisji]

Savages gonna savage. That was in 523 AD




This is 2014. Don't see any Jew or Christian invoking something 1500 yr old to kill children.

Maybe not in 2014 but lets not fool ourselves by saying that they never did in ths century or or the one preceding it.

Edit: Banu Qurayzah reference is from 627AD hence the 100 years ago

[Tekkendo]

Maybe not in 2014 but lets not fool ourselves by saying that they never did in ths century or or the one preceding it.

Of course you are right in that. Many Jewish kings were murderers and thieves and scum. So were many Christian rulers. Scum gonna scum. Savages gonna savage.

I don't think she mean it was invented by muslims or it was an exclusively muslim practice. She just said where the Talib pigs got their deluded justification from.

[faisji]

Of course you are right in that. Many Jewish kings were murderers and thieves and scum. So were many Christian rulers. Scum gonna scum. Savages gonna savage.

If history is history then let it be.If i cant judge you according to what ppl did in 20th century or the 20 preceding it or the 30 preceding it then dont justify the murder of our children as our fault because some thing that happened 15 centuries ago.

[AKMuzzle]

It's completely relevant because of how the prophet and his followers create their own definitions of what a child is in order to justify child abuse, rape and slaughter.


http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religiou...ud/038-sat.php


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgenic_hair

So do you consider a 9 year old a child and now do you see the relevance?

Ah yes its about time you actually checked your sources.Good girl.

The most authentic of ahadiths indicates warriors were killed so why are we discussing children and who was presumed a child and who wasnt?

[AKMuzzle]

You posted a source saying Moh kept women and children as slaves? fukin lolz

When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property-(Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)

you wot?

[Tekkendo]

If history is history then let it be.If i cant judge you according to what ppl did in 20th century or the 20 preceding it or the 30 preceding it then dont justify the murder of our children as our fault because some thing that happened 15 centuries ago.

Sure talibs are scum savages, and not sane muslims. Sane muslims don't commit such atrocities. The problem is why there are so many psychos so easily finding excuses and justification in Islam to commit such crimes. It is obviously not an isolated incident caused by a few deluded individuals