acturial science is up there
|
-
11-13-2014, 06:59 PM #31
-
11-13-2014, 07:00 PM #32
-
-
11-13-2014, 07:01 PM #33
-
11-13-2014, 07:03 PM #34
-
11-13-2014, 07:05 PM #35
So glad I don't know this feel. Ordinary differential equations was enough for me, I think it was primarily the professor though.
Don't know those partial differential equations feels.
Everyone who is going to be actuary at my school does a math degree, then just takes stats and probability classes for the electives.Trading/Investing Thread Crew
Math Thread Crew
Poker & Sports Betting crew
**1st Team All Sports Misc**
Portland Trail Blazers Crew
Oregon Ducks Crew
RIP ThePrimeSalmon
-
11-13-2014, 07:05 PM #36
-
-
11-13-2014, 07:07 PM #37
-
11-13-2014, 07:08 PM #38
The GOAT checked in.
Seriously want to cry this term in Group Theory, I hate it so much. Just want to do probability stuff, and other applied stuff. I liked Calculus a lot so I figure I'll like Analysis more than this.
Was just informed yesterday that they have a full year Abstract Algebra sequence, don't understand how anyone could want to do that. Absolutely not going to follow this up w/ Ring & Field Theory.Trading/Investing Thread Crew
Math Thread Crew
Poker & Sports Betting crew
**1st Team All Sports Misc**
Portland Trail Blazers Crew
Oregon Ducks Crew
RIP ThePrimeSalmon
-
11-13-2014, 07:12 PM #39
-
11-13-2014, 07:12 PM #40
All the super smart physics bros I know knew their math SOLID. But a pure math guy doesn't need to know physics on top of his math. That being said, how can such a conclusion be drawn about whether pure math or physics is more difficult? I mean, the guys who are math scholars are regularly trying to solve some of the most challenging math problems ever. But those are just the scholarly math bros; I literally have no idea what kind of job a typical math major gets if they don't go into scholarly work. Math can obviously be super difficult because the scholarly bros are always trying to tackle problems nobody can solve. The same thing goes for the physics brahs. While the physics bros need to know both math and physics, maybe the math brahs need to know so much different kinds of math that it makes up for the difficulty imbalance for needing to know both math and physics? No idea...
Last edited by MusicProducer; 11-13-2014 at 07:20 PM.
Hoistin' heavy-ass s**t since 2006.
Hoist to get'em moist crew.
Raw hoister crew.
-
-
11-13-2014, 07:12 PM #41
-
11-13-2014, 07:17 PM #42
-
11-13-2014, 07:19 PM #43
-
11-13-2014, 07:19 PM #44
-
-
11-13-2014, 07:22 PM #45
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 1,606
- Rep Power: 0
I am poverty at math but get by enough to do astrophysics. Not everyone has to be a mathematician. Only those interested in theory need to be amazing at math. I can do observations, process the data in a presentable format, and analyze without ever doing more than integrals. Which I do in software any way. Same with Fourier series. Sure, I passed a course demonstrating I know it. But if I want to smooth a light curve I click a button.
-
11-13-2014, 07:23 PM #46
How so? I am a professional physics bro... I deal with mathematicians nearly on a daily basis; they seem just as stressed out as I do. How can you measure this sort of thing? There's many different kinds of math and all different sorts of physics. One mathematician may be familiar with 20 different kinds of math while one physicist maybe be familiar with 10 categories of physics, and another physicist an expert in 20 different kinds of physics while the mathematician is at home with 10 different maths. IMO, the whole question of asking which field is more difficult is bogus in the first place. There are too many factors to consider, and "difficulty" is too subjective on a professional level for sure.
Of course you could look at the statistics and see what kinds of grades math majors are pulling compared to physics majors, but this kind of assessment is almost useless on a practical level. I mean, do you want to ask the question "Which subject is more difficult for an undergrad student?" or "Which subject is more 'difficult' for professionals in the math or physics field" (where it really matters). Answers are probably different. It seems as though between the time people finish undergrad and the time they start working on these subjects on a professional level there's a leveling-off effect in "difficulty" just because the physicist and mathematician know so much in their respective fields. Perhaps there's a big gap in difficulty when people are just beginning to learn this stuff but the gap narrows once everybody has a solid hold on the fundamentals and start dealing with the more complex issues.
Reminds me of how when I started learning Mandarin I thought it was challenging as hell (analogous to to the 'undergrad' phase of learning Physics), just because it was so different from Romance languages, but after I got familiar with reading characters and I got used to the pronunciation, learning it was easy because Mandarin's grammar is super-simple compared to English. On the flip side, learning French was easy in the beginning but it got harder and harder because of all the memorization for conjugation and different forms of grammar; it drove me nuts. So it's like... is learning Mandarin harder than learning French? Difficult to answer...Last edited by MusicProducer; 11-13-2014 at 09:02 PM.
Hoistin' heavy-ass s**t since 2006.
Hoist to get'em moist crew.
Raw hoister crew.
-
11-13-2014, 07:24 PM #47
neuroscience or pathology, idk about math's degree's but i'm assuming you use formulas to work out problems and such, so if you generally know the formulas you atleast have a chance of passing exams. with biology you either know it or you don't, there's no mid point and theres so many big fking words and concepts in neuroscience and pathology
-
11-13-2014, 07:25 PM #48
Who cares? All degrees are easy, that's why thousands of people across hundreds of institutions complete each of them every year.
You know what's hard? Making a difference in your field- not sitting in the background and arguing with the other plebs about which of you satisfactorily completed the most difficult subjects.
-
-
11-13-2014, 07:27 PM #49
-
11-13-2014, 07:27 PM #50
-
11-13-2014, 07:28 PM #51
Physics is the hardest of all. Its closely followed by pure mathematics. Then, it's computer sciences and the hardest engineering degrees (Electrical and software). Then, it's medical degree and chemistry along with the easiest engineering disciplines (Mechanical, civil, etc.). Then, it's biology, or anything in human sciences.
Don't fooled, it's about how you are successful in your respective field that matters, not if it's harder or easier than other fields.
From a graduated student in physics (actually working on complex networks and neuronal action potentials).
-
11-13-2014, 07:29 PM #52
-
-
11-13-2014, 07:29 PM #53
-
11-13-2014, 07:31 PM #54
Lol at people touting their own field as the best. Not denying math is hard..but it's just.. a different form of thinking. Most people are emotional ("social") thinkers.. the regular peeps who are fascinated by their social circle
Focus on dominance and watch your math skills increase by ten-fold. Dominance as in noticing every single original source of the following material, ie what it's composed of. Take things in chunks breaking down small chunks at a time because you recognize whats important/ where things came from.
Eventually you'll be so honed in on every single answer going around in life you'll be so overwhelmed at all the potentialities. .ie become that bumbling socially awkward dude who has a hard time "bringing himself down" to talk because you've boiled everything down to its inception point, and you'll be so overwhelmed at everything thrown at you because your stuck in that always delineating, one answer, mindset. Whom then has to turn to other material and school work to find solace because sociality throws so many complexities into an otherwise methodical presence. If your supersmart math guy isn't already a "mad scientist" he surely has anxiety/depression ..what do other posters say about this?
-
11-13-2014, 07:35 PM #55
-
11-13-2014, 07:38 PM #56
-
-
11-13-2014, 07:39 PM #57
-
11-13-2014, 07:40 PM #58
-
11-13-2014, 07:41 PM #59
Depends on the accounting - international tax is god awful because of all the rules. And accutuarial accounting is just hard because of the amount of the math - hence it is all computerized now much like engineering.
I do Business Management for a living - but I have to know IT, programming, accounting, HR, tax law, OSHA... and often times some levels of engineering and craft workmenship so I can deal with the engineers and union/craft hall members.
-
11-13-2014, 07:50 PM #60
Similar Threads
-
Why does everyone want to be an Engineer?
By Supadude in forum Misc.Replies: 426Last Post: 09-24-2012, 04:48 PM -
Why does everyone call BS on engineering salaries right out of school?
By arekieh in forum Misc.Replies: 216Last Post: 09-19-2012, 09:41 PM
Bookmarks