Sanchez had a great MNF start, throwing for over 330+ yards, 2 TDs, and no picks.
But then again, it was against the turrible Carolina Panthers.
If we can go into Lambeau, and get a win there, I'll be a true believer in the Sanchize. Just think that Rodgers is gunna carve up our secondary. The only DB I actually want to stay on the team next year is Jenkins and maybe Fletcher. Everyone else can pls go. Nelson and Cobb have combined for 1,400 yards and 18 TDs so far this season and I don't see our secondary really stopping Rodgers from going Rodgers, BUT if Sanchez can step up and make the offense a juggernaut, then the lackluster play of the secondary won't matter.
In the Sanchize we trust
|
-
11-13-2014, 05:01 PM #1
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
- Posts: 889
- Rep Power: 1271
This Sunday is a very important game for Mark Sanchez (Eagles V Packers)
-
11-13-2014, 05:12 PM #2
If Sanchez does play well and our offense can counter their scoring then it will simply come down to the defenses and if they can get stops. I hate that our defense gives up so much yardage but they're near the top in redzone defense. I think our healthy O-line is better but Matthews will be a problem just like watt was a few weeks back. This should be interesting. The play calling needs to tighten up a bit( no goofy double fakes and bubble screens that clearly don't work) and find a way to get shady going. And can they possibly sell the run a little more on the fake handoffs? I hated foles for this. Rodgers will have a hell of a day and whoever has him in fantasy will rack up points. I'd expect a 400+ 3 TD/1 INT for Rodgers, nothing less.
-
11-13-2014, 05:13 PM #3
-
11-13-2014, 05:15 PM #4
That first gif he got lucky on that throw. It could just have easily has been an int.
Anyways he played a good game I can admit that.
But cam handed you guys that w on a silver platter.
Like to see how he responds coming from behind with more pressure in him.
Good luck on Sunday hope you guys lose though.
-
-
11-13-2014, 05:26 PM #5
-
11-13-2014, 05:29 PM #6
-
11-13-2014, 05:56 PM #7
-
11-13-2014, 06:03 PM #8
-
-
11-13-2014, 06:07 PM #9
-
11-13-2014, 06:28 PM #10
-
11-13-2014, 07:02 PM #11
-
11-13-2014, 07:13 PM #12
Lol this. Sanchez is statistically the worst qb over a 4 year period in the history of the nfl. He isnt all of a sudden a different guy. Were talking about buttfumble Sanchez here, lets not forget that. The eagles dont run the ball and their qb is Sanchez, thats not good. Having said all that, Sanchez is playing in a compleatly different system than in ny and im going to withhold final judgement until after the green bay game.
-
-
11-13-2014, 10:09 PM #13
-
11-13-2014, 10:12 PM #14
-
11-13-2014, 10:14 PM #15
I think both of you, like many, are expecting him to suck and to lose and to look bad. I'm not saying he is our saving grace and we are going to win the Super Bowl . All I'm saying is the guy is a competent QB who is good enough to manage a game and utilize the weapons Chip Kelly has in place. That's all we need. Our O-line will take a couple of weeks to get going now that they're healthy again, but ill repeat myself," If we can finally get the running game going(which I predict will happen), we will win that game."
-
11-13-2014, 10:15 PM #16
-
-
11-13-2014, 10:19 PM #17
-
11-13-2014, 10:19 PM #18
I'm not gonna post it because it takes too much time on mobile but I took a look at the defensive stats and we better them in everything but passing which is where we will get torched in this game as well. If all you're implying is Sanchez not turning the ball over multiple times for us to win the game then I'd agree with you but for every other team out there as well. Statistically we are a better team. 100% healthy and we are going to really hurt people's feelings. We will see but people swear GB is top tier and we are a garbage team pretending ATM.
-
11-13-2014, 10:21 PM #19
-
11-13-2014, 10:22 PM #20
-
-
11-13-2014, 10:25 PM #21
-
11-13-2014, 10:27 PM #22
-
11-13-2014, 10:30 PM #23
-
11-13-2014, 10:33 PM #24
Like weeden, Sanchez was on a ****ty offensive team. Neither had a chance although Sanchez did take them to the conference championship a couple of times. I'm not too familiar with weeden but comparing the only games the two have started this year against similarly bad teams, I'd have to say Sanchez is, by far, the better backup. Just read our sig, I guess we have come full circle now lol. Turkey day can't come soon enough
-
-
11-13-2014, 10:34 PM #25
-
11-13-2014, 10:34 PM #26
-
11-13-2014, 10:47 PM #27
eagles secondary is gonna have to pull the rabbit out of the hat because 90% of the time rodgers exposes every teams secondary, if you can cover nelson and cobb then you have a good shot at winning the game, sick and tired of seeing nelson wide open all the time and making him look like a goat when he's average at best and these horrible defenses that the packers are playing are making them look better than they are.. we saw what the lions, seahawks and saints did to shut rodgers down and i think the eagles will be able to do that long as they score over 28ish points
* MINNESOTA VIKINGS *
* THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YOU AND ME MISC IS A COUPLE OF DRINKS *
-
11-13-2014, 10:49 PM #28
Sanchez just needs to protect the ball and be a game manager. I'm not buying him as a possible franchise QB, i know thats not happening.
Eagles are 2nd in total sacks in the NFL. Pressure is absolute KEY in this matchup. Rodgers is hot and with our vulnerable secondary, if he has enough time he'll shred these fools.Philadelphia Eagles Kentucky Wildcats
-
-
11-13-2014, 10:54 PM #29
-
11-13-2014, 10:58 PM #30
Bookmarks