Halle Berry says she's paying too much child support

[ThisisnotChad]

I don't know 1 guy who HASN'T been screwed over by child support which turns into ex girlfriend support.

Have nothing but good feels when it's the other way around.

[HankScorp1o]

How can anyone justify that a child needs $16 000 to be raised. Lets just take out the equation here that its a female or male paying for the child.

There should be a cap of 400-500/month for child support.

That's low. You tryna raise your kid in ****lia brah?

[Weezy32]

That's low. You tryna raise your kid in ****lia brah?

How is it low ... if i am contributing 400 and my wife who has a child is contributing 400 ... that is $800...if you cant raise a kid on $800 a month then i got some bad news for you. Heck i have a car payment , pay insurance, eat out have cellphone bill, and i can still live off $800.

You cant really include housing in there because you are gonna have to get an apartment or house to live in whether your child lives with you or not.

[JRMoore82]

How can anyone justify that a child needs $16 000 to be raised. Lets just take out the equation here that its a female or male paying for the child.

There should be a cap of 400-500/month for child support.

Just for clarity there are caps unless the child is born into a lavish lifestyle.

So let's say man woman living normal life and divorce and judge gets to a cap marker in their state it stops there. Then if dad or mom hits it big nothing changes. At least it's not supposed to as the kid never lived the lavish life. Judge could raise it up to the cap but isn't supposed (strong suppost) to according to most state statutes.

The lavish lifestyle issue was a way for woman to milk it.

Tables turned. Not one **** given.

[dajungle]

this forum is so backward and immature

if you think child support laws like this are ridiculous you should be against whoever they're forced upon, man or woman. You're no different from the "feminists" or whoever is on the other side if you applaud when it happens to a woman, right and wrong shouldn't depend on gender.

[jro9999]

The laws are weird when it comes to this stuff

A lot of is based on the idea that the child should "not seeing a drop in quality of life" which means if you're balling as fukk and get a divorce the payments could be absurdly high based on the idea that it's in the best interest of the child to continue to live whatever lavish lifestyle they had when the parents were married

What child actually needs $16k/month? That's almost $200,000 a year which is more than what 99% of adults make for a salary. Nobody needs that much. But, if you make enough money to live like kings and are able to provide the highest quality everything for your kids a judge can argue the kid still deserves all that after the parents split

Edit: agree with the others. You dumb *******s arguing it's okay because it usually happens the other way around are just flat out retarded

[Weezy32]

Just for clarity there are caps unless the child is born into a lavish lifestyle.

So let's say man woman living normal life and divorce and judge gets to a cap marker in their state it stops there. Then if dad or mom hits it big nothing changes. At least it's not supposed to as the kid never lived the lavish life. Judge could raise it up to the cap but isn't supposed (strong suppost) to according to most state statutes.

The lavish lifestyle issue was a way for woman to milk it.

Tables turned. Not one **** given.

Hmm i dont know about that... i know a pharmacist that makes 95k a year had a kid with a GF and he has to pay her like $30k a year in child support. The bish dont even work.


They never lived together or anything.. the kid never got used to "lavish lifestyle".

The laws are weird when it comes to this stuff

A lot of is based on the idea that the child should "not seeing a drop in quality of life" which means if you're balling as fukk and get a divorce the payments could be absurdly high based on the idea that it's in the best interest of the child to continue to live whatever lavish lifestyle they had when the parents were married

What child actually needs $16k/month? That's almost $200,000 a year which is more than what 99% of adults make for a salary. Nobody needs that much. But, if you make enough money to live like kings and are able to provide the highest quality everything for your kids a judge can argue the kid still deserves all that after the parents split

Edit: agree with the others. You dumb *******s arguing it's okay because it usually happens the other way around are just flat out retarded

Ok so in that case the judge should give custudy to the parent that is making all that money. I still dont get how that guy got the kid anyway... if she is the one that is balling out of control. Dont mothers get custudy of kids like 80% of the time anyway ?

[AndYUKnowThis]

I don't know 1 guy who HASN'T been screwed over by child support which turns into ex girlfriend support.

Have nothing but good feels when it's the other way around.

No its not the other way around. The only reason is happens to men a lot is because men tend to make more money. Maybe you guys should stop marrying poor women and it wouldn't be a problem. If either spouse is rich, they will be the one paying. If I'm making $80k, you better believe I won't be marrying a women who makes less than $60k

[dajungle]

So when a sloot bleeds an athlete for 10-20k a month its cool?

So when a man sloot bleeds an actress for 10-20k a month its cool?

[HankScorp1o]

How is it low ... if i am contributing 400 and my wife who has a child is contributing 400 ... that is $800...if you cant raise a kid on $800 a month then i got some bad news for you. Heck i have a car payment , pay insurance, eat out have cellphone bill, and i can still live off $800.

You cant really include housing in there because you are gonna have to get an apartment or house to live in whether your child lives with you or not.

You're making a big assumption that's not based even remotely in reality, which is that in any given scenario, BOTH parents are contributing the same amount of money to a child's welfare... In an IDEAL world, that might be the case, but in the REAL world, it often isn't.

...again, 400-500/month is too low to be considered the right place for a "cap" on child support. BTW you seem to be unaware of what child support is intended to actually pay for (hint: it's not just direct expenses that ONLY affect the kid)

[SwayWay]

How can anyone justify that a child needs $16 000 to be raised. Lets just take out the equation here that its a female or male paying for the child.

There should be a cap of 400-500/month for child support.

Countless rich men pay exorbitant amounts of money in the six figures a month to pay for "child support" its a scam way for the courts to convert wealth from men to women. That's all.

[Cynic09]

So when a man sloot bleeds an actress for 10-20k a month its cool?

That's like 1/20th her income. That ain't chit.

[JRMoore82]

You're making a big assumption that's not based even remotely in reality, which is that in any given scenario, BOTH parents are contributing the same amount of money to a child's welfare... In an IDEAL world, that might be the case, but in the REAL world, it often isn't.

...again, 400-500/month is too low to be considered the right place for a "cap" on child support. BTW you seem to be unaware of what child support is intended to actually pay for (hint: it's not just direct expenses that ONLY affect the kid)

Got bad news for you.........

http://www.washoecourts.com/filing_o...ear%202014.pdf

1000 max for one child

So 500 isn't that far off really

[SwayWay]

this forum is so backward and immature

if you think child support laws like this are ridiculous you should be against whoever they're forced upon, man or woman. You're no different from the "feminists" or whoever is on the other side if you applaud when it happens to a woman, right and wrong shouldn't depend on gender.

until feminists know what it feels like NO Laws will change. I wouldn't be surprised if some mangina/feminst judge rules with Berry and cuts the child support to 3K something that would NEVER happen for a man in this situation. The court/legal system is heavily skewed against men.

[dajungle]

I don't know 1 guy who HASN'T been screwed over by child support which turns into ex girlfriend support.

Have nothing but good feels when it's the other way around.

You're no better than those who enable and support women doing this to men. This is a sign of low intellegence when you think "getting even" is a solution here when some random woman gets screwed instead. You're admitting it's not wrong, only when it happens to a man.

[HankScorp1o]

Got bad news for you.........

http://www.washoecourts.com/filing_o...ear%202014.pdf

Lol not sure if srs or suffering from down syndrome... you're illustrating my point for me.

Even the MINIMUM in that memo is higher than the MAXIMUM the guy I was responding to suggested.

1000 max for one child

So 500 isn't that far off really

Double the amount isn't "that far off"? Intredasting.

[dajungle]

That's like 1/20th her income. That ain't chit.

That's like 1/20th of a mans income who's forced to pay the same, that ain't chit either?

[Cynic09]

That's like 1/20th of a mans income who's forced to pay the same, that ain't chit either?

nikka please. Most men are forced to pay out like 50%+ of their income. She's being forced to pay peanuts compared with what she makes. I'm surprised it's not 100k/month.
And yes, that ain't chit if a guy makes as much as her and has to pay 16k/month. What now?

[dajungle]

until feminists know what it feels like NO Laws will change. I wouldn't be surprised if some mangina/feminst judge rules with Berry and cuts the child support to 3K something that would NEVER happen for a man in this situation. The court/legal system is heavily skewed against men.

How is cheering when it happens to a woman helping this? You're not saying it's ridiculous, you're saying it's only ridiculous when it happens to men.

[Weezy32]

You're making a big assumption that's not based even remotely in reality, which is that in any given scenario, BOTH parents are contributing the same amount of money to a child's welfare... In an IDEAL world, that might be the case, but in the REAL world, it often isn't.

...again, 400-500/month is too low to be considered the right place for a "cap" on child support. BTW you seem to be unaware of what child support is intended to actually pay for (hint: it's not just direct expenses that ONLY affect the kid)

Why is it wrong to assume that the other parent should contribute just as much if they are going to get custody.

There is no reason some broke uneducated girl... or guy in this situation should ever get custudy over someone that is very successful. Only time that should be the case is if that successful person is a child molestor or doesnt have the time for the child.

[dajungle]

***** please. Most men are forced to pay out like 50%+ of their income. She's being forced to pay peanuts compared with what she makes. I'm surprised it's not 100k/month.

Even if this were true, which it probably isn't, you wouldn't be okay if an actor was forced to pay his ex GF 10-20k a month, so you shouldn't be happy when it happens to a woman either. Right and wrong shouldn't be determined by gender and until you recognize this you'll just stay on the losing side of those who think the same as you do, but against men instead.

[BFast55]

I thought they wanted equality under the law?

[FlabbyAndSick]

Child support has always been spousal support for the custodial parent. At most a child needs $100/wk. Enough for a week's worth of food. That's it. A penny more and you're taking care of mommy.

[whiteboyspotted]

lol as if 16k a month is any problem for her

[dopamine72]

$192,000 A Year

How has no one said this yet? That's ridiculous.

What in the fuk....

[AndYUKnowThis]

until feminists know what it feels like NO Laws will change. I wouldn't be surprised if some mangina/feminst judge rules with Berry and cuts the child support to 3K something that would NEVER happen for a man in this situation. The court/legal system is heavily skewed against men.

Again, what are you miscers talking about? This happens to men more because men tend to make more money. If more women were rich then we'd see more cases like this. I guarantee if you marry a rich woman, have kids and divorce YOU will be getting child support from her.

This isn't feminism. This is fuked up court laws. And two wrongs don't make a right.

[Purge]

Is this where the angry virgins are convening today?

No, but it's not where the White Knights and Manginas are either.

[Rayaarito]

The argument is kid was born into that lifestyle and should be maintained in that life style. Which I agree.

Why?

[Slurgie]

Her husband and her ex, no homo:

Current husband:


ex-husband:

[JRMoore82]

Lol not sure if srs or suffering from down syndrome... you're illustrating my point for me.

Even the MINIMUM in that memo is higher than the MAXIMUM the guy I was responding to suggested.

Double the amount isn't "that far off"? Intredasting.

Meant to imply his cap ain't far off from real world cap. Gross monthly 4.2k for 670. State of Nevada has it set for 18% for one child. Average person is probably making 3200 before taxes and the 18% puts em at $570.

So my bad on interpretation and explanation of my post. But the other parent in these situations gonna have to have a job and help raise the kid.