Interracial Breeding is Progressive for Society

**EuropaX4** · 10-01-2014, 02:20 AM

Originally Posted by 21infantry

Ha, I am a Marxist really? Couldn't be farthest from a Marxist as they come, don't believe in one thing that Communist, Marxist, Socialist believe in. And Europe has only been refereed to the EU in the past 20 years. I don't think that you know what EU even means, to clarify for you it means European Union. European obviously because its the Continent of Europe and Union because that is the Economic and Political aim of the organization a Union of European Nations who's sovereignty is ruled by Brussels, by those career Socialist Politicians who are power hungry and will destroy culture, economies and nations to obtain it. I am against it, in all forms. So NO I don't quite fit the Socialist, Marxist, or Communist label you called me. Shyte I even find the Social model of European Government a joke and a destroyer of dreams and success.

Should the entire Continent of Europe be renamed 'the European Union'? If you think the name 'Europa' refers to the EU and indicates that I support it then you are a retard.

**21infantry** · 10-01-2014, 02:29 AM

Originally Posted by EuropaX4

Should the entire Continent of Europe be renamed 'the European Union'? If you think the name 'Europa' refers to the EU and indicates that I support it then you are a retard.

Nope, you are the one who said that it has always been referred as the EU, I pointed out that it hasn't. What I did accuse you of is being a EU fan boy, because your user name is Europa, which in my experience only EU fan boys would put as there screen name. Most Europeans would Identify with there homeland or Nation not the phucking continent they reside in. Wife Identifies as German not European, in her words "Calling myself European, would be a omission that I share a big hunk of land with a bunch of morons" I have actually heard this sentiment from several nationalities.

**detrimental** · 10-01-2014, 02:58 AM

Originally Posted by indosthetic

There is nothing genetic about it.

If you take a group of African infants and move them to Germany with German parents who will raise them, they will grow up with practically identical habits and attitudes to indigenous Germans.

If you take a group of German infants and move them to a Detroit ghetto with black parents, they will grow up with practically identical habits and attitudes to the local black folk and probably end up like Eminem, minus the lyrical talent.

I wouldn't be surprised if there is a genetic implication involved. I doubt it's 100% cultural. We're talking about thousands of years of breeding here to define a homogenous culture.

I'm half British, half German... It's quite clear to me that my British genes took control, lmao

**lazi** · 10-01-2014, 05:08 AM

Originally Posted by indosthetic

There is nothing genetic about it.

If you take a group of African infants and move them to Germany with German parents who will raise them, they will grow up with practically identical habits and attitudes to indigenous Germans.

If you take a group of German infants and move them to a Detroit ghetto with black parents, they will grow up with practically identical habits and attitudes to the local black folk and probably end up like Eminem, minus the lyrical talent.

it's scary people can actually believe this in 2014. go read up on twin studies, who were separated at birth. they turn out the same, even after being raised in drastically different environments. you are 100% incorrect.

**RingDips** · 10-01-2014, 05:34 AM

Originally Posted by indosthetic

There is nothing genetic about it.

If you take a group of African infants and move them to Germany with German parents who will raise them, they will grow up with practically identical habits and attitudes to indigenous Germans.

If you take a group of German infants and move them to a Detroit ghetto with black parents, they will grow up with practically identical habits and attitudes to the local black folk and probably end up like Eminem, minus the lyrical talent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneso...Adoption_Study

Cliffs: Upper middle class white families in Minnesota adopted children from a variety of backgrounds, controlling for as many environmental factors as possible. In adulthood, the IQs and behavioral patterns of the adopted children display a far stronger affinity to their biological stock than to the metrics of the parents who raised them nearly from birth.

Cliffs of cliffs: Genetics > environment (but environment is still important)

**bbsitum** · 10-01-2014, 06:43 AM

Originally Posted by RingDips

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneso...Adoption_Study

Cliffs: Upper middle class white families in Minnesota adopted children from a variety of backgrounds, controlling for as many environmental factors as possible. In adulthood, the IQs and behavioral patterns of the adopted children display a far stronger affinity to their biological stock than to the metrics of the parents who raised them nearly from birth.

Cliffs of cliffs: Genetics > environment (but environment is still important)

This is true. My parents tried to build me each in his own way. No matter how much they bit me or bs on me I grow in my own way. And I know exactly grandparent that I'm at. I'm physically and psychologically at him.

**JUSA** · 10-01-2014, 08:31 AM

Originally Posted by IDrinkBloodLOL

As long as this stupid chit isn't forced on anyone, go for it.

^ This.

I had a liberal friend, a white guy, who spewed this Bullworth bull****, when it came time for him to get married, he married another white girl, same hair, same color eyes, might as well been his cousin. Do as we say, not as we do, the liberal mantra.

Personally, I could give a rat ****. I think genetically you don't want to go too far down the same hole, else you end up like the inbred Hillbilly's (also the Japanese, they're having problems with a lack of genetic diversity amongst their people). Having children with mixed heritage isn't a bad thing.

**Posthardcore** · 10-01-2014, 08:41 AM

Originally Posted by 21infantry

What? Seriously, I acknowledge what I see as simply superiority overall. And I don't even belong to that group, loosely related but I am defiantly Anglo-Saxon not Germanic. The word Racist means nothing to me, has no effect or do I feel immoral by those words being uttered. A spade is a spade simple as that.

lol ''defiantly''

But good job at ignoring what I said.

Originally Posted by lazi

it's scary people can actually believe this in 2014. go read up on twin studies, who were separated at birth.

Why don't you link multiple peer-reviewed studies?

Originally Posted by RingDips

Cliffs of cliffs: Genetics > environment (but environment is still important)

Lol you might wanna look at the ''interpretation'' section.

**lazi** · 10-01-2014, 08:45 AM

Originally Posted by Posthardcore

But good job at ignoring what I said

Yeah that's posthardcore's thing

**Posthardcore** · 10-01-2014, 08:47 AM

Originally Posted by lazi

Yeah that's posthardcore's thing

Are you high?

**surf junkie** · 10-01-2014, 08:48 AM

Originally Posted by GermanBB

I love for love. I'm entirely open to dating any race but Middle Eastern... that said, I'd still prefer if I wind up with someone else that's my race. Which is why I take offense to your "However if our generation steps up..." That's racist. You may see it a positive goal, but swaying persons either way regarding race and love is incredibly fcked up.

And what race is Middle Eastern? I have never heard of that sub-species. Please cite some further reading on this Middle Eastern sub-species.

**surf junkie** · 10-01-2014, 08:59 AM

ITT

openly racist non-white miskers who don't get sent to camp, attempting to hide their fetish for caucasian women behind the "diversity is good so let me in" slogan.

**surf junkie** · 10-01-2014, 09:06 AM

RE cultural diversity ...

It is not a policy of equality.

Cultures are not all equal, when assessed by certain fundamental standards.

Thus, when one culture mixes with another, one will gain and the other will lose.

A good culture gains nothing by mixing with a chit culture, and can only stand to lose, to the extent that it mixes.

**ONtop888** · 10-01-2014, 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by PaulG

There can never be universal unity through biology in this era. Not without the GMO man. Even in ethnically homogenous Japan there are Japanese people ethnically categorized and looked down upon. Look at how the Russians-Ukraine name calling each other. In some parts of Africa tribes will kill each other if their nose is slightly smaller. In Brazil even the mixed categorize each others if they're slightly whiter or darker. In a pure mixed society, there will be genes cancelling out genes entirely. There are recessive and dominate genes that will select for particular features.

This why your argument is fallacious in trying to solve a problem that is as old as man. It may of worked for tribes that were somewhat alike, but, it definitely won't work universally. Marrying someone for love is one thing, but, doing it to unite humanity is just a farce. To unite humanity, the financial and political system that controls the social context of life needs to evolve. People are dumb, it's like blaming the sheep and cattle for the actions of meat eaters.

This x 1000. Can confirm from my time in Brazil, the lighter the shade, the more value that is ascribed to the person based on aesthetics alone. People will divide themselves based on any and every thing, as subtle, stupid, or mundane as it may seem.

**RingDips** · 10-01-2014, 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by Posthardcore

Lol you might wanna look at the ''interpretation'' section.

Lol you might wanna tell us more about how you believe evolution never happened. Lol. Lol.

I have read the interpretation section, you stupid fuk. Briefly, it consists of Scarra and Weinberg jumping to incorrect conclusions based only on the data collected from the children at age 7; the follow-up data collected at age 17 was still nine years off. The interpretation section goes on to say how other researchers drew a hereditarian conclusion from the completed study, while Scarra and Weinberg retracted their initial environment-as-king stance, saying "we should have been agnostic on the conclusions". Get rekt, flat-earther.

Here, read this if you can muster the attention span. Hint: go to page 6 under the heading "Conclusion" for maximum butthurt.

**QuickNutkus** · 10-01-2014, 09:13 AM

Progressive towards what? Third world status?

**Posthardcore** · 10-01-2014, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by RingDips

Lol you might wanna tell us more about how you believe evolution never happened.

You do make a very good case for this statement.

**JUSA** · 10-01-2014, 09:20 AM

Originally Posted by JUSA

^ This.

I had a liberal friend, a white guy, who spewed this Bullworth bull****, when it came time for him to get married, he married another white girl, same hair, same color eyes, might as well been his cousin. Do as we say, not as we do, the liberal mantra.

Personally, I could give a rat ****. I think genetically you don't want to go too far down the same hole, else you end up like the inbred Hillbilly's (also the Japanese, they're having problems with a lack of genetic diversity amongst their people). Having children with mixed heritage isn't a bad thing.

Here is the neg rep message left by IDrinkBloodLOL for the rather innocuous message I made:

Originally Posted by IDrinkBloodLOL

I'm glad you think halfie mongrel children is "not a bad thing."

1. I actually agreed with your stance that it didn't matter, so long as it wasn't forced. Sounds like you're posting one thing and thinking another, though.
2. Sorry my ideas that genetic diversity isn't a bad thing got you so upset. Enjoy marrying your first cousin, I guess? I didn't realize you came from Appalachia.

**TLTrooper** · 10-01-2014, 09:30 AM

Interracial breeding might be progressive, and I don't care who marries who or fuks who, but keep in mind, when you attach labels, you also attach expectations and high expectations and labels WILL net you NEGATIVE attention at some point. It repeats itself through history's events time and time again. Women's rights become feminism, then feminism becomes radical-feminism and look at where it has gotten us, radical feminism is so much more pronounced now versus then, that you can actually get away with calling it anti-male. Same goes for racial minorities, it has gotten SO much attention with SO many expectations that you can essentially say that white guilt and racism against whites is the new vessel for racial equality.

Never give any "social justice" too much attention, otherwise you will run into problems. People will use and abuse the system and cause chaos over by hyping it up excessively.

**PaulG** · 10-01-2014, 09:44 AM

This thread... lol.

You guys know how there is this thing called gender dysphoria pushed around by psychologists? Well, I now invent racial identity dysphoria, to describe people who experience significant dysphoria with their genes they were assigned at birth and/or the racial identity associated with a race.

Makes sense right?

The medical treatment for gender dysphoria is "to support the individual in physically modifying the body to better match the psychological gender identity." In a world of equality we need medical programs for racial identity dysphoria. Altering the body in every way possible to match their psychological racial identity. It is the moral and progressive thing to do in a society of black and white or male and female; where identity is a social construct.

Many of yaw'll ITT need to goto a psychologist asap and get this sorted out. You need medical aid and surgery to match your psychological racial identity. This is a serious issue.

Source for pic:
*****://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g29P3-xj7GQ

**surf junkie** · 10-01-2014, 09:50 AM

Originally Posted by PaulG

This thread... lol.

You guys know how there is this thing called gender dysphoria pushed around by psychologists? Well, I now invent racial identity dysphoria, to describe people who experience significant dysphoria with their genes they were assigned at birth and/or the racial identity associated with a race.

Makes sense right?

The medical treatment for gender dysphoria is "to support the individual in physically modifying the body to better match the psychological gender identity." In a world of equality we need medical programs for racial identity dysphoria. Altering the body in every way possible to match their psychological racial identity. It is the moral and progressive thing to do in a society of black and white or male and female; where identity is a social construct.

Many of yaw'll ITT need to goto a psychologist asap and get this sorted out. You need medical aid and surgery to match your psychological racial identity. This is a serious issue.

Source for pic:
*****://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g29P3-xj7GQ

inb4 the first full-body skin transplant ...

"man wants to be skinned alive and have different color skin to match his feel"

**mTOR** · 10-01-2014, 10:24 AM

Originally Posted by RingDips

The interpretation section goes on to say how other researchers drew a hereditarian conclusion from the completed study

"other researchers"

lol'd.

Specifically two. And it's the usual suspects.

**zakatak333** · 10-01-2014, 10:30 AM

Originally Posted by RedHorizons

I propose only white women being open to people of other races. The women of non white races will only be reserved for men of their race. White women shall be open to all races

UmadAnglos?

not mad because that's not gonna happen

i encourage black, brown, red and yellow men to breed the white women

much like i encourage white men to breed the black, brown, red and yellow women

and brown men to breed the black, red and yellow women

and yellow men to breed the black, brown and red women

including all the different shades of yellow and brown

etc. etc.

breed the women, breed them

**Spartan5364** · 10-01-2014, 10:37 AM

How about ****ing no
leave this cuckold bullchit off of the r/p

**Posthardcore** · 10-01-2014, 10:42 AM