Reply
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User SouthPawSD's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2011
    Posts: 55
    Rep Power: 153
    SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    SouthPawSD is offline

    Article on how big of deficit you can safely maintain muscle at

    Hey all, I mostly lurk around here but found something interesting that I thought I would bring up. In this article : baye. com/calculating-the-daily-calorie-deficit-for-maximum-fat-loss/
    The main point is you can keep a deficit of [lbs of bodyfat] x [30] and as long as your withing this range, you don't have to worry about losing any LBM.
    Thoughts, comments, opinions? Sorry if this has been discussed before, couldn't find anything using search
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Sam the Eagle Znik's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2012
    Posts: 11,790
    Rep Power: 47369
    Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Znik has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Znik is offline
    It's true for the "average joe" that has poor nutrition, don't exercise much, dont do much lifting and do do much cardio.

    But we don't know the limit for someone who is active with lifting and/or cardio and has good nutrition. Everyone seems to agree that these factors increases the maximum fat mobilization, but no one knows the actual number since there is no research about it.

    Keep in mind the specific foods and macronutrient ratios consumed by the subjects were far from optimal for fat loss, and that “moderate activity levels” is not the same as regular, high intensity strength training. The maximum rate is most likely higher for someone eating adequate protein and not overdoing carbohydrate intake and strength training would also contributes to maintenance of lean body mass when calorie intake is below maintenance level.
    My story going from obese to fit while battling daily chronic headaches:
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=155566013&p=1104734533#post1104734533

    Summer shred 2015. -final updated posted Sept. 19.
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=167135911
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User SouthPawSD's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2011
    Posts: 55
    Rep Power: 153
    SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) SouthPawSD has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    SouthPawSD is offline
    Originally Posted by Znik View Post
    It's true for the "average joe" that has poor nutrition, don't exercise much, dont do much lifting and do do much cardio.

    But we don't know the limit for someone who is active with lifting and/or cardio and has good nutrition. Everyone seems to agree that these factors increases the maximum fat mobilization, but no one knows the actual number since there is no research about it.
    So what do you think this means to recommendations? To me it seems the advice of "500 cal deficit" would be for those approaching low bodyfats, and most of the people asking for advice have the ability to lose fat lbs much faster.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User jimsmith9999's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 1,441
    Rep Power: 6517
    jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000) jimsmith9999 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    jimsmith9999 is offline
    Originally Posted by SouthPawSD View Post
    So what do you think this means to recommendations? To me it seems the advice of "500 cal deficit" would be for those approaching low bodyfats, and most of the people asking for advice have the ability to lose fat lbs much faster.
    A good read on the topic.

    http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat...or-large.html/
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Serpentarius's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Woodbridge, California, United States
    Age: 39
    Posts: 18,286
    Rep Power: 31163
    Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Serpentarius is offline
    I think common sense works best here, the fact that you know a 2000 calorie deficit isnt normal for a somewhat leanish guy. If a person has a massive deficit like that they deserve the consequences.
    There is always someone less fortunate, with real hunger, with real adversity, who made something of themselves. What is your excuse?
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Banned Jnewman011's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2011
    Posts: 263
    Rep Power: 0
    Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500) Jnewman011 is not very helpful. (-500)
    Jnewman011 is offline
    I believe Lyle McDonald debunked this a while back. Basically, with adequate protein and heavy lifting, you can forget that number
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Bo Flecks' Training Lean and Power Density Experiment
    By Bo_Flecks in forum Over 35 Workout Journals
    Replies: 9408
    Last Post: 11-03-2015, 11:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts