What the **** is wrong with these people?!
|
-
04-02-2014, 05:08 PM #1
-
04-02-2014, 05:10 PM #2
-
04-02-2014, 05:12 PM #3
-
04-02-2014, 05:12 PM #4
-
-
04-02-2014, 05:12 PM #5
-
04-02-2014, 05:12 PM #6
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Posts: 8,089
- Rep Power: 22741
Im gonna be srs for a second. The reality you live in, is not the same reality shared by everyone you see/meet. In their mind/reality, that image is perfectly aceptable.
My Training Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=149612633
Crew Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157295413&p=1141543273#post1141543273
Da Utubez: http://www.youtube.com/user/Inspeckdadeck
-
04-02-2014, 05:13 PM #7
-
04-02-2014, 05:13 PM #8
-
-
04-02-2014, 05:13 PM #9
-
04-02-2014, 05:13 PM #10
-
04-02-2014, 05:15 PM #11
-
04-02-2014, 05:15 PM #12
-
-
04-02-2014, 05:15 PM #13
-
04-02-2014, 05:15 PM #14
Lol. If you raise your dog right, he will never be aggressive. It's called obedience training and thugs who usually own pitbulls don't do it.
Das it mane. Das it.
I'll tell you what, the media does a great job brainwashing people like OP into thinking pitbulls are some kind of rabid beasts, when in reality, it's because 99% of the people who own pitbulls are convicts who wouldn't be able to raise a kid if you told them exactly what to do, let alone a pitbull.
-
04-02-2014, 05:16 PM #15
-
04-02-2014, 05:17 PM #16
-
-
04-02-2014, 05:17 PM #17
-
04-02-2014, 05:18 PM #18
Indeed.
Three facts:
- Pit bulls aren't naturally more aggressive.
- The news stories of pit bulls mauling infants is all media propaganda backed by the Obama administration.
- It's perfectly safe and responsible to leave your infant child in the care of an animal.
If you disagree you're brainwashed.
-
04-02-2014, 05:18 PM #19
-
04-02-2014, 05:19 PM #20
http://jiv.sagepub.com/content/21/12/1616
"Owners of cited high-risk (“vicious”) dogs had significantly more criminal convictions than owners of licensed low-risk dogs. Findings suggest that the ownership of a high-risk (“vicious”) dog can be a significant marker for general deviance and should be an element considered when assessing risk for child endangerment."
Just look at who owns the dogs next time there's an attack. 99.999% of the time it's a ghetto urban youth trash family (no offense) or a white trailer trash family.
I don't know if we live in the same world, but here where I live, pitbulls are glorified by gangster/criminal/thug culture 24/7. Guess who ends up owning the majority of pitbulls and gives them a bad name?Last edited by deerdiary; 04-02-2014 at 05:22 PM.
-
-
04-02-2014, 05:19 PM #21
-
04-02-2014, 05:19 PM #22
-
04-02-2014, 05:19 PM #23
-
04-02-2014, 05:23 PM #24
-
-
04-02-2014, 05:24 PM #25
Heres my babydoll, shes a pure bred blacknose pitbull with champion fighting heritage (when it was legal) but more dog show winning heritage. Her lineage has been documented since 1908. Shes smart as ****, tough as ****, and sweet as ****. <3Former USAF Crew
Firearms Crew
Metalhead Crew
HTC Crew
Mod-Negged Crew
-
04-02-2014, 05:25 PM #26
-
04-02-2014, 05:25 PM #27
-
04-02-2014, 05:26 PM #28
-
-
04-02-2014, 05:27 PM #29
"People of Race A had significantly more criminal convictions than people of Race B. Findings suggest that being a person of Race A can be a significant marker for general deviance and should be an element considered when assessing risk for child endangerment."
Strong legal logic. The breed of dog you own determines whether or not you are a criminal and should have your children taken away from you.
-
04-02-2014, 05:27 PM #30
Similar Threads
-
The No Contact Thread
By UAGreg in forum Relationships and Relationship HelpReplies: 9879Last Post: 09-05-2014, 03:48 AM
Bookmarks