Reply
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Registered User kmoff77's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 46
    Posts: 264
    Rep Power: 234
    kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    kmoff77 is offline

    Any good articles arguing that clean eating is better then IIFYM?

    Can anyone recommend any articles that argue clean eating is better then DCA?

    I need this for a paper I am writing in school and having a tough time finding anything good.
    Last edited by kmoff77; 03-02-2014 at 04:25 PM. Reason: edited to get rid of dirty term IIFYM
    My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323

    April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
    Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
    May 6 2014- 159.2
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Chasing cats since 1967 WonderPug's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Location: New York, New York, United States
    Posts: 52,345
    Rep Power: 323440
    WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) WonderPug has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    WonderPug is offline
    You are looking for citations to articles that suggest using the silly, ill-defined metaphor "clean eating" is superior to using the often misunderstood acronym IFFYM, which is just a different name for the long-established concept in nutrition better known as DCA?
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User ZMan45's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: United States
    Age: 33
    Posts: 3,817
    Rep Power: 11496
    ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    ZMan45 is offline
    Good luck on that paper. Must be pretty tough considering you clearly have no understanding of either term.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User rand18m's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 61
    Posts: 4,703
    Rep Power: 4634
    rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    rand18m is offline
    Op what makes you think that IIFYM's isn't "clean eating"?
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Come at me, bro! foodandfitness's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Location: Lewisville, Texas, United States
    Posts: 2,522
    Rep Power: 12584
    foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) foodandfitness is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    foodandfitness is offline
    Originally Posted by kmoff77 View Post
    Can anyone recommend any articles that argue clean eating is better then IIFYM?

    I need this for a paper I am writing in school and having a tough time finding anything good.
    It's hard to find something that doesn't exist.

    Now if you were to take the angle of examining at-risk behaviors and populations for nutrient deficiencies, you'll have a plethora of research at your fingertips. There's plenty of research that looks into links between inadequate nutrient consumption and excessive energy consumption with morbidity and mortality.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User kmoff77's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 46
    Posts: 264
    Rep Power: 234
    kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    kmoff77 is offline
    Originally Posted by WonderPug View Post
    You are looking for citations to articles that suggest using the silly, ill-defined metaphor "clean eating" is superior to using the often misunderstood acronym IFFYM, which is just a different name for the long-established concept in nutrition better known as DCA?
    Yes I am. It is an argumentative research paper. I'm not saying that I believe either stance or even agree with the term IIFYM. I am just looking for research on both ends of the debate.
    My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323

    April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
    Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
    May 6 2014- 159.2
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User kmoff77's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 46
    Posts: 264
    Rep Power: 234
    kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    kmoff77 is offline
    Originally Posted by ZMan45 View Post
    Good luck on that paper. Must be pretty tough considering you clearly have no understanding of either term.
    Thanks man. Curious what makes you say that?

    I just needed a paper that I could BS 15 pages to get through this class. English is definitely not my major.
    My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323

    April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
    Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
    May 6 2014- 159.2
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User kmoff77's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 46
    Posts: 264
    Rep Power: 234
    kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    kmoff77 is offline
    Originally Posted by rand18m View Post
    Op what makes you think that IIFYM's isn't "clean eating"?
    I really do understand that when cutting and doing "IIFYM", most of the foods you eat will be "clean" type foods.

    My mistake for using the dreaded IIFYM term. Is flexible dieting more appropriate? Or just stick with DCA?
    My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323

    April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
    Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
    May 6 2014- 159.2
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Registered User rand18m's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 61
    Posts: 4,703
    Rep Power: 4634
    rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    rand18m is offline
    Originally Posted by kmoff77 View Post
    I really do understand that when cutting and doing "IIFYM", most of the foods you eat will be "clean" type foods.

    My mistake for using the dreaded IIFYM term. Is flexible dieting more appropriate? Or just stick with DCA?
    Did you pick this subject or was it directed?
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Registered User kmoff77's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 46
    Posts: 264
    Rep Power: 234
    kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    kmoff77 is offline
    Originally Posted by rand18m View Post
    Did you pick this subject or was it directed?
    i picked it. My claim is that "flexible dieting" is more sustainable and effective then fad diets. I just wanted to throw something argumentative in there regarding the people who think that "clean" eating is superior.

    I know it probably wasn't the best choice for a paper, but this is something I am doing right now and I figured I would be able to put 15 + pages out there and get a B.
    My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323

    April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
    Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
    May 6 2014- 159.2
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Registered User ZMan45's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: United States
    Age: 33
    Posts: 3,817
    Rep Power: 11496
    ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) ZMan45 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    ZMan45 is offline
    Originally Posted by kmoff77 View Post
    Thanks man. Curious what makes you say that?

    I just needed a paper that I could BS 15 pages to get through this class. English is definitely not my major.
    You make the assumption about IIFYM that it is inherently the opposite of "clean". Tracking macros does not automatically mean "dirty".
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Cancer Nurse Brah DatMurse's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2013
    Location: San Diego, California, United States
    Posts: 3,642
    Rep Power: 10495
    DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    DatMurse is offline
    Originally Posted by kmoff77 View Post
    i picked it. My claim is that "flexible dieting" is more sustainable and effective then fad diets. I just wanted to throw something argumentative in there regarding the people who think that "clean" eating is superior.

    I know it probably wasn't the best choice for a paper, but this is something I am doing right now and I figured I would be able to put 15 + pages out there and get a B.
    the claim would be more psychological than anything else with sustainability, fad diets, and bandwagon. Your topic you picked is too in depth for any of us to discuss with you on how to implement it into a paper.
    Last edited by DatMurse; 03-02-2014 at 05:38 PM.
    From Houston, now I am in San Diego

    Registered Nurse? Or work in the healthcare? Come join
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=147557373
    -=Degenerative Disc Disease Crew=-
    -=Torn Pec Crew=-
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Registered User kmoff77's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: Pennsylvania, United States
    Age: 46
    Posts: 264
    Rep Power: 234
    kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50) kmoff77 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    kmoff77 is offline
    Originally Posted by ZMan45 View Post
    You make the assumption about IIFYM that it is inherently the opposite of "clean". Tracking macros does not automatically mean "dirty".
    No i never said that. But i know there are a lot of articles out there of "Clean eating vs IIFYM". I just was looking for something to use as a debating point.
    My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323

    April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
    Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
    May 6 2014- 159.2
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    Registered User rand18m's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Texas, United States
    Age: 61
    Posts: 4,703
    Rep Power: 4634
    rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) rand18m is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    rand18m is offline
    Originally Posted by kmoff77 View Post
    i picked it. My claim is that "flexible dieting" is more sustainable and effective then fad diets. I just wanted to throw something argumentative in there regarding the people who think that "clean" eating is superior.

    I know it probably wasn't the best choice for a paper, but this is something I am doing right now and I figured I would be able to put 15 + pages out there and get a B.
    The problem you have is that unlike the idea of DCA, or IIFYM, clean eating can't fully be described because it means something different to virtually everyone who believes in the term. Mostly it reduces the discussion to good and bad food in isolation and is really not a dietary composition at all. In other words pseudo dietary dogma if you will. You could focus on the variability of the definition of clean eating and how that compares to scientifically accepted dietary compositions for otherwise healthy people. GL
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    Cancer Nurse Brah DatMurse's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2013
    Location: San Diego, California, United States
    Posts: 3,642
    Rep Power: 10495
    DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) DatMurse is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    DatMurse is offline
    Originally Posted by kmoff77 View Post
    No i never said that. But i know there are a lot of articles out there of "Clean eating vs IIFYM". I just was looking for something to use as a debating point.
    articles are not a legitimate source to get information for college level papers.
    From Houston, now I am in San Diego

    Registered Nurse? Or work in the healthcare? Come join
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=147557373
    -=Degenerative Disc Disease Crew=-
    -=Torn Pec Crew=-
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts