Can anyone recommend any articles that argue clean eating is better then DCA?
I need this for a paper I am writing in school and having a tough time finding anything good.
|
-
03-02-2014, 03:15 PM #1
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 264
- Rep Power: 234
Any good articles arguing that clean eating is better then IIFYM?
Last edited by kmoff77; 03-02-2014 at 04:25 PM. Reason: edited to get rid of dirty term IIFYM
My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323
April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
May 6 2014- 159.2
-
03-02-2014, 03:18 PM #2
-
03-02-2014, 04:07 PM #3
-
03-02-2014, 04:09 PM #4
-
-
03-02-2014, 04:16 PM #5
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: Lewisville, Texas, United States
- Posts: 2,522
- Rep Power: 12584
It's hard to find something that doesn't exist.
Now if you were to take the angle of examining at-risk behaviors and populations for nutrient deficiencies, you'll have a plethora of research at your fingertips. There's plenty of research that looks into links between inadequate nutrient consumption and excessive energy consumption with morbidity and mortality.
-
03-02-2014, 04:17 PM #6
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 264
- Rep Power: 234
-
03-02-2014, 04:20 PM #7
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 264
- Rep Power: 234
-
03-02-2014, 04:22 PM #8
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 264
- Rep Power: 234
-
-
03-02-2014, 04:30 PM #9
-
03-02-2014, 04:49 PM #10
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 264
- Rep Power: 234
i picked it. My claim is that "flexible dieting" is more sustainable and effective then fad diets. I just wanted to throw something argumentative in there regarding the people who think that "clean" eating is superior.
I know it probably wasn't the best choice for a paper, but this is something I am doing right now and I figured I would be able to put 15 + pages out there and get a B.My one year weight loss thread with pics- http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161271323
April 1 2013- 215 (heaviest ever)
Oct 1- 195 (started tracking macros/cals. More lifting weights/less cardio)
May 6 2014- 159.2
-
03-02-2014, 04:52 PM #11
-
03-02-2014, 05:01 PM #12
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Posts: 3,642
- Rep Power: 10495
-
-
03-02-2014, 05:11 PM #13
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 264
- Rep Power: 234
-
03-02-2014, 05:23 PM #14
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 61
- Posts: 4,703
- Rep Power: 4634
The problem you have is that unlike the idea of DCA, or IIFYM, clean eating can't fully be described because it means something different to virtually everyone who believes in the term. Mostly it reduces the discussion to good and bad food in isolation and is really not a dietary composition at all. In other words pseudo dietary dogma if you will. You could focus on the variability of the definition of clean eating and how that compares to scientifically accepted dietary compositions for otherwise healthy people. GL
-
03-02-2014, 05:38 PM #15
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Posts: 3,642
- Rep Power: 10495
Bookmarks