Think about how you pick up a pen. There's some electrical activity in your brain. Your neurons fire. They send a signal down into your nervous system. It passes along down into your muscle fibers. They twitch. You might, say, reach out your arm. It looks like it's a free action on your part, but every one of those - every part of that process is actually governed by physical law, chemical laws, electrical laws, and so on.
So now it just looks like the big bang set up the initial conditions, and the whole rest of human history, and even before, is really just the playing out of subatomic particles according to these basic fundamental physical laws. We think we're special. We think we have some kind of special dignity, but that now comes under threat
|
-
02-09-2014, 10:48 AM #1
lol@ free will and people who think they have free will
-
02-09-2014, 10:51 AM #2
-
02-09-2014, 10:51 AM #3
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Bristol, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 2,135
- Rep Power: 6489
Determinism right?
I've always felt like determinism is probably right, seeing as if the big bang was exactly reproduced, everything would turn out the same just as if an explosion was exactly reproduced. Pretty depressing when you think about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism
Also, if you think about it, only two things govern who you are as a person - Your genetics, and every single experience in your life. From day one, you have absolutely no control over either.
-
02-09-2014, 10:53 AM #4
-
-
02-09-2014, 10:53 AM #5
-
02-09-2014, 10:54 AM #6
-
02-09-2014, 10:57 AM #7
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Arlington, Texas, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 5,752
- Rep Power: 10351
We are just moving around in flesh vehicles, it's not really "us".
NPC Amateur.
Central Texas Showdown 2012: No placing
Independence Day Classic 2014: 3rd Place - Novice Heavyweight
Mind + Body + Nature + Universe
"Life doesn't exist anywhere but Earth? That's like taking a cup of ocean water and saying there aren't any whales in the ocean." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Think abstract, ask questions.
-
02-09-2014, 10:59 AM #8
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Bristol, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 2,135
- Rep Power: 6489
Well this is how i interpret it, it would be wrong:
So imagine an explosion. Particles move outwards all over the place. Let's say you could recreate the explosion exactly down to every last parameter, in theory you could predict exactly where every particle involved is going to end up.
If you take the big bang, first of all there is "nothing", no time no space just an extremely dense mass of something, which at some point suddenly expands outwards creating the universe as we know it. Everything contained in the universe was in that original mass.
So everything following the big bang, was predetermined by the original conditions / everything contained in that dense mass - so if you had a computer powerful enough, and you knew all the original conditions, it would be just like recreating an explosion and predicting where every particle would end up.
I could be way off tbh, but this is what i got from it.
-
-
02-09-2014, 10:59 AM #9
-
02-09-2014, 11:00 AM #10
-
02-09-2014, 11:01 AM #11
-
02-09-2014, 11:02 AM #12
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Colorado, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 417
- Rep Power: 277
Determinism based on genetics and the environment is what I've always believed in. Choice is just an illusion. You'd always make the exact same choices in that given moment based upon your cumulative environment/experiences up to that point in your life combined with your genetics. Technically, if you knew everything there ever was to know, including, for example, every movement of every grain of sand in the Sahara Desert, you'd be able to predict the future. It's complicated but I believe it to be true 100%.
-
-
02-09-2014, 11:02 AM #13
I know enough contemporary physical theory to know it's not really like that. It's really a probabilistic theory. There's room. It's loose. It's not deterministic." And that's going to enable us to understand free will. But if you look at the details, it's not really going to help because what happens is you have some very small quantum particles, and their behavior is apparently a bit random. They swerve. Their behavior is absurd in the sense that its unpredictable and we can't understand it based on anything that came before. It just does something out of the blue, according to a probabilistic framework. But is that going to help with freedom? I mean, should our freedom be just a matter of probabilities, just some random swerving in a chaotic system? That starts to seem like it's worse. I'd rather be a gear in a big deterministic physical machine than just some random swerving.
So we can't just ignore the problem. We have to find room in our contemporary world view for persons with all that that entails; not just bodies, but persons. And that means trying to solve the problem of freedom, finding room for choice and responsibility, and trying to understand individuality.
-
02-09-2014, 11:04 AM #14
This. Half of your threads are like they are created by someone using HEAVY drugs and the other half look like too obvious trolling attempts. Just to contribute to the thread, we are not 100% sure if the world is deterministic or not. Go read some quantum theory, it hints that there is a possibility that the universe is not deterministic, in simple terms: if you knew the initial conditions of big bang you could not predict the outcome because "luck" comes into play.
-
02-09-2014, 11:04 AM #15
-
02-09-2014, 11:04 AM #16
-
-
02-09-2014, 11:07 AM #17
-
02-09-2014, 11:09 AM #18
-
02-09-2014, 11:10 AM #19
-
02-09-2014, 11:12 AM #20
I've thought of this too, and I've always wondered (not accounting for quantum randomness) if the 'big crunch' will occur eventually, resulting in another big bang, and everything that has ever happened will occur exactly as it did before, ad infinitum. Also, check this out:
Your brain makes up its mind up to ten seconds before you realize it, according to researchers. By looking at brain activity while making a decision, the researchers could predict what choice people would make before they themselves were even aware of having made a decision.
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/0804....2008.751.html
-
-
02-09-2014, 11:13 AM #21
-
02-09-2014, 11:15 AM #22
-
02-09-2014, 11:15 AM #23
-
02-09-2014, 11:16 AM #24
-
-
02-09-2014, 11:17 AM #25
-
02-09-2014, 11:22 AM #26
-
02-09-2014, 11:22 AM #27
You ran straight into the cartesian "mind-matter" debate with a physicalist argument .Try again OP,your statement doesn't disprove free will.Free will refers the ability for humans to control the variables that are available,laws are constant not variable.In all situations under the same circumstances physical/chemical/biological laws will prevail.
I'm here to make friends and listen to other peoples problems,send me a PM if you want to talk.I misc at odd hours.
-
02-09-2014, 11:22 AM #28
-
-
02-09-2014, 11:23 AM #29
-
02-09-2014, 11:25 AM #30
Similar Threads
-
Nutrion Help please please help me!! (beggin here lol)
By joeturner in forum NutritionReplies: 9Last Post: 02-09-2014, 12:59 AM
Bookmarks