Reply
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Registered User Alvingreen's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2013
    Age: 27
    Posts: 29
    Rep Power: 0
    Alvingreen has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    Alvingreen is offline

    heavy on free weights or heavy on smith?

    Like what people said, if you wanna get big you gonna lift big, If im lifting heavy, must i go for free weights or smith machine? For example, bench press. I know free weights is good as in it trains your stabilising muscles, whereas smith machine targets on certain specific muscle parts. If Im lifting heav, on free weights, i wouldnt be balancing and doesnt it like gets your muscle out of symmetry? But smith machine will get the targeted muscles work, but it doesnt train your stabilising muscles, right? I need some opinion, free weights or smith for chest, why? Thanks
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    ‎ ‎ ‎ Brozef's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2013
    Location: Maine, United States
    Posts: 12,726
    Rep Power: 201220
    Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Brozef has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Brozef is offline
    Originally Posted by Alvingreen View Post
    Like what people said, if you wanna get big you gonna lift big, If im lifting heavy, must i go for free weights or smith machine? For example, bench press. I know free weights is good as in it trains your stabilising muscles, whereas smith machine targets on certain specific muscle parts. If Im lifting heav, on free weights, i wouldnt be balancing and doesnt it like gets your muscle out of symmetry? But smith machine will get the targeted muscles work, but it doesnt train your stabilising muscles, right? I need some opinion, free weights or smith for chest, why? Thanks
    Free weights > Machines

    Certain machines have their place (especially cable stations) but free weights are best. Range of motion, unhindered motion, need to stabilize etc.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    I'm hungry again Nosepull's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Location: United States
    Posts: 1,749
    Rep Power: 370
    Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50) Nosepull will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Nosepull is offline
    Free weight if possible. The Smith machine is unnatural and even potentially dangerous for many lifts.
    My running and ICF 5x5 log - http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=153761921
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Banned napa1m's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: Austria
    Posts: 2,804
    Rep Power: 0
    napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500) napa1m is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    napa1m is offline
    Heavy on both

    Although freeweight is usually better

    Smith is perfectly fine too though
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Bootless Errand ironwill2008's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Location: United States
    Posts: 85,695
    Rep Power: 1682162
    ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz ironwill2008 has the mod powerz
    ironwill2008 is offline
    Originally Posted by Alvingreen View Post
    Like what people said, if you wanna get big you gonna lift big, If im lifting heavy, must i go for free weights or smith machine? For example, bench press. I know free weights is good as in it trains your stabilising muscles, whereas smith machine targets on certain specific muscle parts. If Im lifting heav, on free weights, i wouldnt be balancing and doesnt it like gets your muscle out of symmetry? But smith machine will get the targeted muscles work, but it doesnt train your stabilising muscles, right? I need some opinion, free weights or smith for chest, why? Thanks
    If you have to ask the question, just stick with free weights for now.
    No brain, no gain.

    "The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon

    Where the mind goes, the body follows.

    Ironwill Gym:
    https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388


    Ironwill2008 Journal:
    https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User Alvingreen's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2013
    Age: 27
    Posts: 29
    Rep Power: 0
    Alvingreen has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    Alvingreen is offline
    Originally Posted by ironwill2008 View Post
    If you have to ask the question, just stick with free weights for now.
    But if i go heavy on free weights i wouldnt be able to balance well, and if i keep this up i might be sticking on the same weight
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Tea Bag oldballs's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Location: Snap City, Canada
    Posts: 3,009
    Rep Power: 7407
    oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000) oldballs is a name known to all. (+5000)
    oldballs is offline
    Search for the 10 berzillion threads on this already.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User GeneralSerpant's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: United States
    Posts: 18,335
    Rep Power: 72391
    GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) GeneralSerpant has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    GeneralSerpant is offline
    The conditions you're talking about aren't laws of resistance training.
    -------
    Heavy free-weights doesn't mean inherent lack of balance.

    Marginal losses of weight or stability isn't a thin red line between winners and losers.

    ...Most important, bodybuilding doesn't entail making a commitment to either of these principals. It takes personal dedication and time to figure out which exercises you should be doing, and you don't decide beforehand that all or even majority of your exercises will be generally intensive, or constrictively tense.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Registered User Gitt66's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Age: 33
    Posts: 376
    Rep Power: 191
    Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50) Gitt66 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Gitt66 is offline


    "You can't re-rack life half-way though"

    "Breathe into your balls and follow your heart."

    Current Total : 1050
    Bench: 240, Squat: 355, Deadlift: 455
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Registered User Alvingreen's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2013
    Age: 27
    Posts: 29
    Rep Power: 0
    Alvingreen has a little shameless behaviour in the past. (-10)
    Alvingreen is offline
    Originally Posted by GeneralSerpant View Post
    The conditions you're talking about aren't laws of resistance training.
    -------
    Heavy free-weights doesn't mean inherent lack of balance.

    Marginal losses of weight or stability isn't a thin red line between winners and losers.

    ...Most important, bodybuilding doesn't entail making a commitment to either of these principals. It takes personal dedication and time to figure out which exercises you should be doing, and you don't decide beforehand that all or even majority of your exercises will be generally intensive, or constrictively tense.
    FOr example, chest press and incline chest press, what if I do both smith and free weights? And besides my workout program is one day one body part, so on a particular day I'll be hitting only chest.
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Registered User JOoa0ky's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Age: 35
    Posts: 554
    Rep Power: 3977
    JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JOoa0ky is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    JOoa0ky is offline
    IMO, high incline press and BTN press in smyth is phenomenal for shoulder development.

    Also, if you've never tried somersaults in the smyth for quad sweep then you are by far missing out (:


    Just saying that its not a waste of space as most are taught during their BB 're-education'.
    Always keep an open mind to exercises.
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 237
    Last Post: 03-16-2012, 04:22 PM
  2. Free weights or Machines..?
    By Gerent in forum Workout Programs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-10-2010, 04:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts