yea inb4 repost off reddit, but i was interested to see Misc's thoughts on the subject.
|
-
11-19-2013, 08:01 PM #1
-
11-19-2013, 08:02 PM #2
-
11-19-2013, 08:02 PM #3
-
11-19-2013, 08:02 PM #4
-
-
11-19-2013, 08:03 PM #5
-
11-19-2013, 08:04 PM #6
-
11-19-2013, 08:04 PM #7
-
11-19-2013, 08:05 PM #8
-
-
11-19-2013, 08:05 PM #9
Apparently peoples lives are worth catering to "equality"
My best m8 is a prison guard in arizona. One of the females in his academy could not properly wield a shotgun in training. You want these people as your backup against murderers?With every breath you take youre dying , with every step we take we're falling apart
-
11-19-2013, 08:06 PM #10
-
11-19-2013, 08:06 PM #11
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 13,029
- Rep Power: 40532
No they haven't. These weren't admision standards just to get in, this was the training. They had to do the same length ruck march etc. Honestly, good for them. So long as women are not given any special treatment, and have to go through the exact same training etc, then good for them.
Before people say "well you cant test what actual combat is like blah blah blah" that means that the US military is incapable of adequately training and screening its personnel. In which case, there is no way to know how any of them men who passed training will react either.
-
11-19-2013, 08:06 PM #12
-
-
11-19-2013, 08:08 PM #13
-
11-19-2013, 08:08 PM #14
America good luck with your beta ******* goals of 2013
A young bull and an old bull were standing atop a hill looking at a bunch of heifers in a field below.
The young bull says "Let's run down this hill and fuk one of those heifers."
The old bull replies "No. Let's walk down there, and fuk them all."
-
11-19-2013, 08:08 PM #15
-
11-19-2013, 08:10 PM #16
-
-
11-19-2013, 08:10 PM #17
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Age: 30
- Posts: 12,881
- Rep Power: 16045
-
11-19-2013, 08:11 PM #18
-
11-19-2013, 08:11 PM #19
-
11-19-2013, 08:13 PM #20
-
-
11-19-2013, 08:13 PM #21
-
11-19-2013, 08:14 PM #22
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 1,371
- Rep Power: 6415
When I was a private I got stuck on a sh!tty working party out in the desert, it was me, this other guy, and this girl.. We were in the Mojave desert and we had to make sure there were no vehicles driving down this dirt road in the middle of no where, because they were having a week of live fire exercises. We were dropped off with a radio, 3 boxes of MRE's, a tent, and a few jugs of water, and told we had to check in every hour (all through the night too), and we'd be picked up in 5 days. Well after 2 days, she radio'd in and told them she was having "time of the month issues", so they picked her up and brought someone else out. I have nothing against females in the military but there are just some jobs that restrict them. Had this been in the middle of a real situation, she wouldn't have been able to radio in and get taken out... She may have bled to death... Ok I'm done
USMC '04-'08
"I've known kings to be beggars and beggars to be kings, all because they believed it so"
-
11-19-2013, 08:20 PM #23
if they pass they pass. oh well
Think you of the fact that a deaf person cannot hear. Then what deafness may we not all possess? ~ Dune
We need a new ideology with the core values of reason, honesty, science and secular progress over the older traditions of religion, superstition and dogmatic faith that have long defined humanity. We will never be free to progress and advance until the last stone from the last church is cast down onto the last priest. And every equivalent.
-
11-19-2013, 08:22 PM #24
-
-
11-19-2013, 08:24 PM #25
-
11-19-2013, 08:26 PM #26
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 13,029
- Rep Power: 40532
IF, (emphasis on if) women are able to demonstrate that they are capable of leading troops into combat (this already occurs in other countries such as Canada) than I fail to see the problem. You cannot deny them the ability to do so simply BECAUSE they are women.
Now, if only 1 out of every 10 000, or 100 000 women is able to complete the required training that is fine. Then they are being denied because of an inability to complete the training. But there is no principled reason to deny them the opportunity to do so if they are able to complete all the required training.
Again, I know there is a difference between training and actual combat. But if through training you cannot determine who will be able to handle the stress of combat and who will not be able to, then there is a huge problem for the US military and that would still not be a basis for denying women the ability to serve in combat - since ultimately all you can say is "I dont know"
-
11-19-2013, 08:30 PM #27
-
11-19-2013, 08:32 PM #28
-
-
11-19-2013, 08:34 PM #29
-
11-19-2013, 08:35 PM #30
Bookmarks