Are you circumcised?

[Lolip0p]

Not circumsized here. For any of the FA here, women don't like skinned cocks. Mostly because the dick moves inside the foreskin which doesn't move. So while your thrusting, your whole penis is not

[NYSackExchange]

strong poll race going on ITT

[cuminmeson]

Not circumsized here. For any of the FA here, women don't like skinned cocks. Mostly because the dick moves inside the foreskin which doesn't move. So while your thrusting, your whole penis is not

Yeah that's called phimosis.

[*Fr8 TrAiN*]

I'm cut and I wish I wasn't.

[spcscr]

cut but my kids wont be.

[ClaudeGiroux]

im sorry for you brahs. im surprised at how many people said yes.

why the **** do parents do this? is there any medical benefit?

[NYSackExchange]

Not circumsized here. For any of the FA here, women don't like skinned cocks. Mostly because the dick moves inside the foreskin which doesn't move. So while your thrusting, your whole penis is not

u wot? If you're thrusting the length of your dick, you're thrusting the length of your dick. Even considering phimosis your post makes zero sense.

[G-Profit]

im sorry for you brahs. im surprised at how many people said yes.

why the **** do parents do this? is there any medical benefit?

Well I can't speak for other cut brahs but I still really enjoy sex/bjs even though I know I've lost sensitivity.. It's tough to accept but there is restoration which is apparently legit. Considering trying it but like I said sex is still great and haven't been motivated to start as it seems weird as fuk to us who have been cut since birth.

No excuse for this and I'm angry it happened to me but I know my parents had good intentions.. Circumcision has been the norm in America for a long time and back before internet it's easy to see how there was so much ignorance on the subject. If I have a son he won't be getting cut unless medically necessary.

[bonerise]

i'm not a *******, so no

[jd29]

Not cut

Used to be embarrassed as hell about it as a kid

Hated the fact that my mom didn't have me circumcised, now im really grateful that she didn't

Love my mom

[FeelTheFear]

what the fuk are you talking about reasons I don't fully understand. It is more hygienic excluding any religious connotations.

how on earth is amputating a body part more "hygenic"? Like do you even think about what you post? does it make sense to remove part of a womans labia becaue it's more "hygenic"? Do you advocate removing any other parts of the body because it's more "hygenic"? let alone the most sensitive part of a childs penis

seriously lol @ you

[A0wner21]

The only people in the world that circumcise are jews,muslims, and those born in the U.S. but its usually a decision made by the parents. Before the 1900s circumcisions was not a widely used practice in the U.S., but in order to stop kids from masturbating too much( as the story goes, and that its safer/healthier than uncut) the practice began to spring up in the U.s. Hence why many people born from the early 1900s to the 90s are circumcised, recently with more immigrants coming to the U.S. there are less Americans being circumcised. The only reason some people still circumcised their children is to ensure the son looks like the father and doesn't ask why he looks different.

[copiusGains]

Team Anteater, we winnin

[FeelTheFear]

The only people in the world that circumcise are jews,muslims, and those born in the U.S. but its usually a decision made by the parents. Before the 1900s circumcisions was not a widely used practice in the U.S., but in order to stop kids from masturbating too much( as the story goes, and that its safer/healthier than uncut) the practice began to spring up in the U.s. Hence why many people born from the early 1900s to the 90s are circumcised, recently with more immigrants coming to the U.S. there are less Americans being circumcised. The only reason some people still circumcised their children is to ensure the son looks like the father and doesn't ask why he looks different.

Well actually, the only reason kids are still circumcised is because parents who are circumcised don't want to admit that what was done to them was a terrible crime - so in an act of profound cognitive dissonance they proceed to mutilate their own child because it MUST BE THE CORRECT THING IF MY PARENTS DID IT TO ME

[wheelerx50]

how on earth is amputating a body part more "hygenic"? Like do you even think about what you post? does it make sense to remove part of a womans labia becaue it's more "hygenic"? Do you advocate removing any other parts of the body because it's more "hygenic"? let alone the most sensitive part of a childs penis

seriously lol @ you

Look at all the fuks I give about what you think

Meantime, a recent study projected that declining U.S. circumcision rates could add more than $4 billion in health care costs in coming years because of increased illness and infections.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-styl...#ixzz2kUOimJjp

Well actually, the only reason kids are still circumcised is because parents who are circumcised don't want to admit that what was done to them was a terrible crime - so in an act of profound cognitive dissonance they proceed to mutilate their own child because it MUST BE THE CORRECT THING IF MY PARENTS DID IT TO ME

Yep
Source : FeelTheFear , worldwide expert on everything and anyone who disagrees must be a sheep following what their parents did.

[djwolford]

what the fuk are you talking about reasons I don't fully understand. It is more hygienic excluding any religious connotations.

Yes because it's so hard to wash your dick if it's intact as opposed to when it's mutilated.

My dick is intact, as is my son's dick.

Cut is gross bro.

[lolgreg]

Not circumcised, but that ****'s always pulled back anyway to avoid ant eater status. Some sloot actually tried convincing me I was circumcised because sloot logic.

e: wow surprised to see "no" winning

[jmcdizzle44]

what the fuk are you talking about reasons I don't fully understand. It is more hygienic excluding any religious connotations.

LMAO at this mutilated clown.

[Liftzone08]

Look at all the fuks I give about what you think


Yep
Source : FeelTheFear , worldwide expert on everything and anyone who disagrees must be a sheep following what their parents did.

Dude don't wreck your child's dick. Why cut it? How is that more hygenic? Brb washing head vs brb spending 1 sec more to pull foreskin back and wash head.

just no op, not more hygenic lmao. if anything, head is exposed to more dust and chit through the air when cut.

[Groce]

it's stupid as fuk

[SquatTillSenile]

Dude don't wreck your child's dick. Why cut it? How is that more hygenic? Brb washing head vs brb spending 1 sec more to pull foreskin back and wash head.

just no op, not more hygenic lmao. if anything, head is exposed to more dust and chit through the air when cut.

You might as well be talking to a wall.. Just let this ******* do his thing and be thankful you don't have an ignorant dumbass sadist as a father like his child is destined to have.

[Batjoke100]

I'm pretty sure it's only prevalent in the U.S. and Islamic countries. Personally, i'm cut, I don't see any reason for it, but I don't feel like it really matters if you are or aren't.

[FeelTheFear]

Look at all the fuks I give about what you think


Yep
Source : FeelTheFear , worldwide expert on everything and anyone who disagrees must be a sheep following what their parents did.

lol those stats are completely bogus. Circumcision has never been proven to have even a single health benefit - it has no protective effect for HIV or any STDs and this has been proven through actual science and not just what the american propaganda machine spews out. The only infection that might be affected at all by circumcisoin status are urinary tract infections, but they are somewhat rare and easily treated by a course of antibiotics - a far cry form the prophylactic amputation of erogenous tissue that many Americans think is acceptable. Women are also at a 10x higher risk for UTIs than males, but they are just given antibiotics, no-one thinks it's a good idea to remove their labia.

Since circumcision has no proven health benefit, it literally makes 0 sense to attempt to say that circumcision at all saves money in health care. While circumcision has not been proven to have any health benefits, it DOES cost money - over 300$ per surgery, and over a million surgeries are done per year. In total, the circumcision industry generates over 2 billion dollars of revenue. It's much more likely that THAT is the reason why the practice continues, despite being a complete medical scam.

circ and HIV: http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/vanhowe4/

Based on the studies published to date, recommending routine circumcision as a prophylactic measure to prevent HIV infection in Africa, or elsewhere, is scientifically unfounded.

circ and STI: http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/STD/vanhowe6/

What began as speculation has resulted a century later in 60-75% of American boys being circumcised with no clearly confirmed medical benefit. In the interim, no solid epidemiological evidence has been found to support the theory that circumcision prevents STDs or to justify a policy of involuntary mass circumcision as a public health measure. While the number of confounding factors and the inability to perform a random, double-blind, propective trial make assessing the role of circumcision in STD acquisition difficult, there is no clear evidence that circumcision prevents STDs. The only consistent trend is that uncircumcised males may be more susceptible to GUD, while circumcised men are more prone to urethritis. Currently, in developed nations, urethritis is more common than GUD [34]. In summary, the medical literature does not support the theory that circumcision prevents STDs.

[FeelTheFear]

Not circumcised, but that ****'s always pulled back anyway to avoid ant eater status. Some sloot actually tried convincing me I was circumcised because sloot logic.

e: wow surprised to see "no" winning

the only reason it's even close right now is because the misc is mostly american, and it's peak time right now for america. soon, more aussies will get on and it will fall much more in favor of "no"

Remember, 80% of males in the world are intact. The only countries that circumcise the majority are muslim countries, certain african countries, Israel, philippines, south korea and the united states.

[Come at me bro]

lol those stats are completely bogus. Circumcision has never been proven to have even a single health benefit - it has no protective effect for HIV or any STDs and this has been proven through actual science and not just what the american propaganda machine spews out. The only infection that might be affected at all by circumcisoin status are urinary tract infections, but they are somewhat rare and easily treated by a course of antibiotics - a far cry form the prophylactic amputation of erogenous tissue that many Americans think is acceptable. Women are also at a 10x higher risk for UTIs than males, but they are just given antibiotics, no-one thinks it's a good idea to remove their labia.

Since circumcision has no proven health benefit, it literally makes 0 sense to attempt to say that circumcision at all saves money in health care. While circumcision has not been proven to have any health benefits, it DOES cost money - over 300$ per surgery, and over a million surgeries are done per year. In total, the circumcision industry generates over 2 billion dollars of revenue. It's much more likely that THAT is the reason why the practice continues, despite being a complete medical scam.

circ and HIV: http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/vanhowe4/



circ and STI: http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/STD/vanhowe6/

Never understood the HIV logic

If your banging or jerking like a animal enough to split skin then chill out for a day

However if you have a 6 inch erection but only have enought skin to support 5 1/2 cuz your cut well your gonna have a rough painful skin spitting erection every time

[KBBaron]

all natty

[LookWhoitis]

Cut down to size

[AestheticArab]

I am cut but don't really care. If I ever have kids I won't make them, they can decide if they want to be or not when they're older.

[johnnymalkavius]

My parents couldn't decide so they half circumcised me. I got so many infections they had to finally circumcise the rest at 9 years old. Woest experience of my life.peed blood....

[JonnyB1106]

what the fuk are you talking about reasons I don't fully understand. It is more hygienic excluding any religious connotations.

Brb won't clean my dink because I have foreskin

*******