So I am getting ready to come off of a cut and was debating slowly increasing calories by 100-150 per week (for 4 weeks) until I reach maintenance or going straight to maintenance.... Does either approach make a difference?
I was thinking of going with the first approach as I still have 4 lbs to go and figured I could do double duty....slowly increase calories and still drop a little fat, just at a slower rate. So far I have been dropping between 1-1.5 lbs per week.
|
Thread: Switching From Cut to Bulk
-
10-21-2013, 09:36 AM #1
Switching From Cut to Bulk
-
10-21-2013, 10:36 AM #2
-
10-21-2013, 11:23 AM #3
-
10-21-2013, 12:08 PM #4
I say go more quickly to maintenance and shock the metabolism into burning more. I went up about 200- 400 cal every other day. If we noticed water retention I would stay at that level for a couple more days.
Last edited by girl81; 10-21-2013 at 12:16 PM.
------------------------
"Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" Jesus replied: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."
Matthew 22:36-40
-
-
10-21-2013, 01:34 PM #5
- Join Date: Dec 2009
- Location: Islamorada, Florida, United States
- Posts: 3,151
- Rep Power: 10289
It doesn't matter in the end. I tend to reverse diet because I absolutely love food, don't have a great history of maintaining, and have been known to do a 180 and inhale everything in sight, so increasing slowly keeps me structured/disciplined until my "brain" realizes food will be there tomorrow and the next day and the next day and so on.
-
10-21-2013, 01:41 PM #6
-
10-22-2013, 06:16 AM #7
I am a big fan of the reverse diet. Basically eat 100 calories more than you are right now for a week or so. Then add 100 more and hold for another bit. Then you slowly find current maintenance. At that point, you will continue to eat 100 more over maintenance, which should yield around a 1lb gain per month. If your gains aren't solid or you aren't gaining, up the calories again. It's a slow process, but many people like it.
Your other option is to go straight to assumed maintenance, then go up to whatever surplus you want. The only difference with that (besides instant caloric gratification) is a bit of a water gain from the increase in carbs/calories. No biggie.
So whatever you are comfortable.
Losing fat at 1-1.5 lbs per week is pretty fast actually. Between a 3500-5200 calorie deficit. How little are you eating and how much exercise are you doing?"Start where you are. It's never too late to change your life."
-
10-22-2013, 07:52 AM #8
I am at 1570 cals right now, but was also training for a half marathon (now over) and lifting 3 days per week. I am expecting the loss to slow now that I cut back on the running and am only doing 2 cardio sessions, 1 20 min HIIT and then an hour spin class.
My maintenance should be somewhere between 2000-2100. I am currently 134 lbs and wanted to get to 130 before switching over to my bulk. I think I will end up doing the slower reverse diet option.
-
-
10-24-2013, 05:43 AM #9
-
10-24-2013, 06:44 AM #10
Similar Threads
-
Switching from cut to bulk?
By Batifish in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 2Last Post: 06-22-2011, 07:29 PM -
What was your initial weight gain when switching from cut to bulk?
By jay24k in forum Losing FatReplies: 0Last Post: 07-06-2009, 01:11 PM -
Help with switching from cut to bulk
By T3ZZA in forum NutritionReplies: 2Last Post: 07-19-2008, 09:15 AM -
BF% before switching from Cut to Bulk?
By scrapiron7 in forum Losing FatReplies: 1Last Post: 01-22-2007, 07:08 AM -
Switching from cut to bulk soon...need help on my stack
By Dave P in forum SupplementsReplies: 2Last Post: 06-15-2006, 01:17 PM
Bookmarks