I've always believed that lowering the bar behind your head increases the stretch of the triceps muscle, as well as increasing the ROM and making the exercise more difficult.
Obviously, because of this the shoulder joint does tend to bend a bit towards the head, which would increase lat involvement in the exercise.
I have always felt that this wasn't necessarily "cheating", because I would outweigh the weight I'm able to use on the exercise against keeping form completely strict and lowering the bar to my forehead. I feel you get very little power performing it this way.
Normally I am a stickler on form and never increase weight until I'm able to with perfect form, but I have always used this as a bit of an exception because I still feel my triceps doing most of the work.
Is this cheating, and should I stop lowering the bar behind my head?
|
Thread: "Cheating" on Skullcrushers
-
09-01-2013, 04:51 AM #1
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Age: 38
- Posts: 586
- Rep Power: 1734
"Cheating" on Skullcrushers
-
09-01-2013, 04:57 AM #2
-
09-01-2013, 05:01 AM #3
-
09-01-2013, 07:28 AM #4No brain, no gain.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Where the mind goes, the body follows.
Ironwill Gym:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388
Ironwill2008 Journal:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
-
-
09-01-2013, 02:54 PM #5
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Indiana, United States
- Age: 50
- Posts: 6,638
- Rep Power: 1666
Taking the movement to behind your head and then extending outwards will hit both heads of the tricep. Ripp can explain it much better than I can:
http://www.allthingsgym.com/back-to-...eps-extension/"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 8:38,39
"You've got more definition than a dictionary." -me
Current Ignore List (for consideration's sake :D ): Ancients, ImproperOne, A-GAME
-
09-01-2013, 02:58 PM #6
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Location: Lexington, Kentucky, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 85
- Rep Power: 1332
The Arnold Style (in his encyclopedia) say to lower behind the head. I like those a lot - but I also like the one where I lower the bar straight to the forehead. I can't do as much weight, but I feel they are both worthwhile. Treat them as 2 separate exercises. I feel the behind the head version higher on the triceps, and the straight to the forehead version more around the elbow/lower triceps.
-
09-01-2013, 03:18 PM #7
-
09-01-2013, 07:55 PM #8
-
-
09-01-2013, 07:59 PM #9
-
09-01-2013, 08:02 PM #10
It isn't "cheating" at all, so no worries, but everyone else is right... it is just simply a different exercise, or even a modified version of the skullcrusher... also by not bringing your arms below your head, your isolating the tricep, and not using lats or even chest to help the bar back in front of you head. Either way its a great exercise, so go with what you prefer.
Bookmarks