5'10" 160 pounds ripped is by far the most aesthetic weight to be

[Astrobro]

Zyzz was 6'1 175-180 in that picture you fuking idiot.

hahaha no he wasn't

zyzz prime was a solid 200 lbs

[guyver79]

I'd rather chit in my hands and clap than weigh less than 160lbs.

You know this is bodyBUILDING.com not puny*******s.com?

[apocab]

More like 18-20%. Miscers don't have a clue about bf%, legit think they are 5% lower than they actually are.

[IMG]http://i40.tinypic.com/23sgkfo.jpg[IMG]

Me at 15% bf minus the BBC genetics.

This. Everyone here seems to think they're lower BF than they actually are. You really have to lose a TON of weight to get down to where ya wanna be. I had to drop 25 lbs. Here is before and after from 190 - 167 (lighter now at 160)

[NeverGiveUp87]

This. Everyone here seems to think they're lower BF than they actually are. You really have to lose a TON of weight to get down to where ya wanna be. I had to drop 25 lbs. Here is before and after from 190 - 167 (lighter now at 160)

Damn, mirin cut. I get to 13-15% and feel hungry as **** on 2300 kcals and sabotage diet when I start starving late at night 25 lbs is more like it (someone said he will get to 9-10% bf from 17% by dropping 16 lbs earlier ITT, just no...).

[kenyanbrahhh]

It's not wrong brah...srs. Mirin BBC mass though.

This chart is quite accurate imo.



16% is far from a fatass, mayne

Calipers tell a much more different story than charts...Given the right lighting those percentages can be skewed.

Classic case of thinking you look better than you do brah.

Not trying to say that i look better than i do, i'm simply stating the fact that he is wrong about me being at 18%-20%, especially since i already know what my BF is...which isn't 18-20%

[kanis999]

AVI is 5'8" 155 lbs. Without great lighting and decent posing looked small and flat as phuck. Almost like a non lifter when I wasn't flexing. Would definitely want at least 15 lbs more LBM to reach peak aesthetics while not flexing.

[xMetalocalypse]

Feelsgoodman. Need to cut so I can finally be aesthetic for once.

[NeverGiveUp87]

Calipers tell a much more different story than charts...Given the right lighting those percentages can be skewed.

I know they do, but they underestimate bf%. They're great for tracking relative progress though. That chart is one of if not the most accurate one I can find online (srs)

Not trying to say that i look better than i do, i'm simply stating the fact that he is wrong about me being at 18%-20%, especially since i already know what my BF is...which isn't 18-20%

Haha, you look good man, a lot of mass. Drop 25-30 lbs and you'll look sick. When is it my turn for 190 lbs lean? Peace.

[sothrowedmex]

i think you forgot the part that said YOUR physique. and no. he would not be 160 at 5'10'' *******

how many chicks do you all think Zyzz slayed?











not as many as me in my prime ha

[WIDGE_uk]

5'10 160lbs ripped checking in, its far to small.

[Athos1]

so true though,

Been 150lb to about 16% 210lb..


Now 175-180lb by far most bitches










Still wanna bulk to lean 210

[LamarWeaver]

5'11 165 is skinny as fck

[Manc33]

I am 5'10" and 170lb but I am a fat kunt, I admit that. 27% body fat last time I checked the scales, so to get down to 10% I gotta lose a fuking shytload of fat, I can't even work that out. 17% of 170? 29lb of fat ergo 2 stone! TWO FUKING STONE OF EXCESS FAT ON ME. What would I weigh if my BF was 10% and my muscle mass stayed the same? 170 - 29 = 140lb. This gives you some idea about how little muscle mass I have. Most girls are stronger than me, srs. Why do you think I am always on the Misc. When someone lifts for say 6 months like I have, you'd think they would look like they lift, but I simply went from "really really weak" to just "really weak". Its going to take ten years I know it is. I can't even lift without going to sleep in the daytime every single day. Maybe I am overtraining but this is me overtraining, I am overtraining just walking up a flight of stairs. I think I better just do cardio for 6 months then see if I am fit enough to start lifting properly because it isn't working. The sad part is I do gain strength at a normal level, its just a killer.

[Jorge0886]

fuk this thread, i'm getting depressed. I'm 5'10 about 196lbs right now sitting around 15% or so. Just starting my cut this week. I should be around 180lbs about 10% or so, I'm cutting real slow. I'm going to prove that every fuking person is different....natty or not.

[cajone5]

5'10 170 8% is what I'd consider aesthetic

That's basically my goal.

[Pigeu]

Hi op





Too bad I'm a Manlet

[midcoastking33]

OP was banned. Justice prevails

[bottle_cap]

I hope you realize that a ripped 5'10 160lbs looks twice as big as you do in your avi.

lmao you're delusional

5'10 160 is tiny mode

[trueshredder]

5'10 = 170
5'11 = 185
6'0 = 200
6'1 = 215
6'2 = 230
6'3 = 245
6'4 = 260
6'5 = 275

[stevenjamesvick]

"Guaranteed by me"

show me your credentials *******

[Devils]

It's all about the bodyfat, yeah if you are very low and above 160 lbs at 5'10" you will look great, if you're only like 10% then you'll have to drop more weight to get leaner, and then probably look too small.

[smeaglemei]

lmao pwned

[PattyB15]

Relatively speaking (adjusting for height), Zyzz would be about the same weight ripped (in his prime) (he might have weighed like 5 lbs more or something, but that's negligible).

Assuming Zyzz was roughly his stated height and weight in that photograph (6'1", 205 lbs), his BMI would be 27.0. At 5 foot 10, the weight for that BMI would be 188 lbs, not 160. Please stop.

[frankenstein78]

OP if you're 10% bodyfat or more, you need another 10-15 lbs to be more aesthetic. If you think women flirting with you is all about your physique, you're very wrong. BRB, a lot more women flirting and throwing themselves at me at 14-15% bodyfat than when I was 5-6%. Why? More relaxed, chill and confident. Don't believe the hype that muscles by themselves will get you more women. All it can help is get your foot in the door a little easier.

[nzgs]

It's not wrong brah...srs. Mirin BBC mass though.

This chart is quite accurate imo.



16% is far from a fatass, mayne

That chart is garbage and no one should take it seriously. The first two are pretty much the same bodyfat, just diuretics difference and gym pump/vascularity from certain drugs. The 10-12% is actually 6-8% with a film of water. The 15% is 10-12%. 20% is still under 15%.

This black dude who claims 220lbs is nowhere near 18%, he would hold much more chest fat at 18%. More like 12%, but he's frauding his weight cos he's nowhere near 220lbs unless he has Tom Platz legs under there or a 20 inch cock.

[smeaglemei]

That chart is garbage and no one should take it seriously. The first two are pretty much the same bodyfat, just diuretics difference and gym pump/vascularity from certain drugs. The 10-12% is actually 6-8% with a film of water. The 15% is 10-12%. 20% is still under 15%.

This black dude who claims 220lbs is nowhere near 18%, he would hold much more chest fat at 18%. More like 12%, but he's frauding his weight cos he's nowhere near 220lbs unless he has Tom Platz legs under there or a 20 inch cock.

everything you said no...just no

except for the 220lber frauding weight

[biceppeak]

5'10 = 170
5'11 = 185
6'0 = 200
6'1 = 215
6'2 = 230
6'3 = 245
6'4 = 260
6'5 = 275

no....

[xacimo]

U mirin stats brahs?

[hardgainersrs]

yah no.

[SapphireFlamez]

Goofy tree
Nvm read 6'10