Zimmerman emerges from hiding to save someone from a car wreck

[lee__d]

Lol at people getting so worked up about something that doesn't affect them in any way whatsoever.

idk, i've been following suspicious looking black kids for a while now

[necon76]

Lol at people getting so worked up about something that doesn't affect them in any way whatsoever.

That's what the internet is for you dumb guy!

[midcoastking33]

Look at how kunty everyone is today

[MASSter]

Look at how kunty everyone is today

Welcome to the internet doucheburger.

[necon76]

doucheburger.

Sooo cheesy.

[midcoastking33]

Sooo cheesy.

some would say lang-esque

[necon76]

some would say lang-esque

I meant the burger, not the joke.

[desslok]

Breaking news:

White man kills defenseless African American child:



Hispanic Male rescues entire family from burning wreckage:



Noob goes on dreamer bulk:

[sawoobley]

The truck is black.

So he saved a white family from a black truck? Intredasting.

[ven33]

I was half heartedly joking..



Speaking of full retard,

[IMG]SavedIMG[/IMG]

You are a truly pathetic individual.


Also, you tend to come back to this fairly often. I'd like to hear your thoughts on why you think a second Civil War is impossible in the United States. Care to elaborate? Please keep in mind the definition of a "Civil War"...

civil war
noun
a war between political factions or regions within the same country.

[necon76]

You are a truly pathetic individual.

Do you have any idea of just how much of a miserable prick you come across as?

[ven33]

Do you have any idea of just how much of a miserable prick you come across as?

I could ask the same thing to you.

[psychodiver9]

Ok ven beat canes

[PhiSig2298]

You are a truly pathetic individual.


Also, you tend to come back to this fairly often. I'd like to hear your thoughts on why you think a second Civil War is impossible in the United States. Care to elaborate? Please keep in mind the definition of a "Civil War"...

civil war
noun
a war between political factions or regions within the same country.

Once hillary is elected in 16, the nutjobs will want to start a civil war but everyone is too lazy to actually do anything except bitch about it on ********.


Oh and I plan on posting that every time you post something stupid so get used to it

[Leprechauns1021]

Ugh. Trying to argue with Tyler? Good luck Ben. They don't require school past 3rd grade in Oklahoma

[PhiSig2298]

Ben

[miacanesfan25]

^pretty sure the majority of ppl in that thread (me included) predicted a not guilty verdict. also looking at (real life) polling numbers, the majority of people actually agree with the verdict. so not sure where you're getting this 99% from?

This is just from the first page of the Let's play Jury thread. I tried going back to find an older thread but no such luck and gave up after the first 5 pages.

Guilty, but will walk.

He's guilty, but he will walk..

Clicked guilty without seeing the content of the thread. Count my vote as meaning not innocent.
I don't understand your wackadoodle legal system.

guilty but will walk.

I can be an idiot, that's just fine by me, but I know my opinions and values never change. I don't need to resort to name calling and skirting my argument to accomodate my wanting to be right. I saw the evidence from day one showing that was not guilty and not racist.


I hate to be the bearer of bad news for some of you, but your views on Ven and I doesn't change just how incredibly wrong and ignorant most of you are.

[necon76]

This is just from the first page of the Let's play Jury thread. I tried going back to find an older thread but no such luck and gave up after the first 5 pages.

Ugh. Do you really not understand what we are saying here?

[miacanesfan25]

Ugh. Do you really not understand what we are saying here?

I understand very clearly.

[necon76]

I understand very clearly.

Then I guess we'll never see eye to eye.


And FWIW, I never called you any names, yet you called me ignorant. So yeah.

[miacanesfan25]

Then I guess we'll never see eye to eye.


And FWIW, I never called you any names, yet you called me ignorant. So yeah.

No I didn't. It was a general statement. Ignorance is rampant when it comes to the evidence of this case.

I'm anxiously awaiting a legitimate explanation of how "guilty" means something other than "guilty".

[MASSter]

Then I guess we'll never see eye to eye.


And FWIW, I never called you any names, yet you called me ignorant. So yeah.

Right Here, Right Meow. Buncha men with PMS ITT. Anyone need a hug?

[miacanesfan25]

Buncha men with PMS ITT.

You're old enough to know how synching periods work.

[MASSter]

You're old enough to know how synching periods work.

You're young enough to know how multiple divorces work. <3

[miacanesfan25]

You're young enough to know how multiple divorces work. <3

<3 <3 I like to reach for the stars.

[SumDumGoi]

This is just from the first page of the Let's play Jury thread. I tried going back to find an older thread but no such luck and gave up after the first 5 pages.


I can be an idiot, that's just fine by me, but I know my opinions and values never change. I don't need to resort to name calling and skirting my argument to accomodate my wanting to be right. I saw the evidence from day one showing that was not guilty and not racist.


I hate to be the bearer of bad news for some of you, but your views on Ven and I doesn't change just how incredibly wrong and ignorant most of you are.

Wasn't your argument before that people shouldn't pass judgments "before" all of the evidence has been presented. We seemed to have this same discussion when it came to Aaron Hernandez as well where you complained that people made a judgement prior to the evidence being presented and even went so far to say that not enough evidence was presented to make an arrest. It is kind of strange that you now seem to be beating your chest because you predicted Zimmerman would be found not guilty before prior the trial and before any evidence had been presented.

[miacanesfan25]

Wasn't your argument before that people shouldn't pass judgments "before" all of the evidence has been presented. We seemed to have this same discussion when it came to Aaron Hernandez as well where you complained that people made a judgement prior to the evidence being presented and even went so far to say that not enough evidence was presented to make an arrest. It is kind of strange that you now seem to be beating your chest because you predicted Zimmerman would be found not guilty before prior the trial and before any evidence had been presented.

I understand where you're coming from, but I think you miss the point a little bit. My issue lies with people cementing he is guilty when there's nothing showing he is, and plenty showing he isn't.

As far as Hernandez, there was nothing at the time. As more and more comes out I'm starting to see them grasping for straws to find more charges because as previously stated they have little. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion either way, the issue is arguing without keeping an open mind. If it does come tha Hernandez is guilty as charged I will gladly admit I was wrong. Most around here will not.

[SumDumGoi]

I understand where you're coming from, but I think you miss the point a little bit. My issue lies with people cementing he is guilty when there's nothing showing he is, and plenty showing he isn't.

As far as Hernandez, there was nothing at the time. As more and more comes out I'm starting to see them grasping for straws to find more charges because as previously stated they have little. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion either way, the issue is arguing without keeping an open mind. If it does come tha Hernandez is guilty as charged I will gladly admit I was wrong. Most around here will not.

The point is that you have a dead 17-year old kid and the guy who shot him acted as a complete dumbass. We have a system that enabled a man who was arrested on several occasions for assault to carry a firearm without even having the safety on. He followed an unarmed kid at night and provoked the kid into a fight, even after attempting to flee the situation. If you think that there is nothing wrong with the law given that Zimmerman was found not guilty there is something very wrong with you. It is Zimmerman's fault this kid is dead.

As for the Aaron Hernandez murder case, you have got to be kidding me! You are STILL suggesting that they don't have enough evidence on the guy? Wow, just wow. I am not going to pretend that I am above name calling. You are an idiot!

[deadpool9]

So opinions:

Did OJ really do it or not?

[miacanesfan25]

The point is that you have a dead 17-year old kid and the guy who shot him acted as a complete dumbass. We have a system that enabled a man who was arrested on several occasions for assault to carry a firearm without even having the safety on. He followed an unarmed kid at night and provoked the kid into a fight, even after attempting to flee the situation. If you think that there is nothing wrong with the law given that Zimmerman was found not guilty there is something very wrong with you. It is Zimmerman's fault this kid is dead.

As for the Aaron Hernandez murder case, you have got to be kidding me! You are STILL suggesting that they don't have enough evidence on the guy? Wow, just wow. I am not going to pretend that I am above name calling. You are an idiot!

I'm baffled as to where you get your information. I'm not sure which Zimmerman trial you watched (or more likely didn't watch based on your statements), but clearly it wasn't the same one the rest of the world watched.