I asked my professor today during our Antro Lecture why Gays are allowed and accepted these days around the world but brother/sister incest is not. Gays come up with 'we can't choose we are'.. Well I don't think that a older brother suddenly said one day 'I want to sleep with my little sister'........... He was born that way and it's the exact same situation as homosexuals. You can't choose who you love.... and who loves you.
I understand the biological issues when it comes to giving birth when the father is also the brother, but what if all sibling couples never have kids? Why can't they adopt like the homosexuals? Not to mention I don't really believe that there are biological issues to begin with.In Game of Thrones Cersei Lannister had 3 kids with Jaime Lannister.(her brother) and the two clearly love each other. None of the 3 children displayed any signs of retardation or deformity. In fact.. Tyrion is the one with the deformities and he came from a non-incestuous couple. The Targaryens are famous for marrying the sisters to the brothers and most of their children turned out fine.
Everyone on this forum who have feelings for a sibling and is too scared to go for it? I just want to say that you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Don't live in regret. We can't choose who we love. We can only hope the love is returned.
|
-
06-11-2013, 02:39 AM #1
Why is homosexuality now accepted, but not
-
06-11-2013, 02:40 AM #2
-
06-11-2013, 02:42 AM #3
-
06-11-2013, 02:42 AM #4
-
-
06-11-2013, 02:43 AM #5
-
06-11-2013, 02:44 AM #6
-
06-11-2013, 02:44 AM #7
Because accidents happen in straight couples all the time.
-Crohn's Disease crew
-Strict limited diet crew
-Gluten Free Crew
Starting weight 114.
My journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=140012233
Oil cleanse your face: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=156983633&pagenumber=
-
06-11-2013, 02:44 AM #8
-
-
06-11-2013, 02:47 AM #9
-
06-11-2013, 02:48 AM #10
accidents happen all the time for everything. That doesnt mean that that thing should be disallowed. furthermore people with genetic defects ARE allowed to have children. Why shouldnt two siblings be allowed to have them when the chances of a defect are FAR lower than say someone who knows that they have some genetic condition.
I'm all for incest being legal, srs.
no incestThink you of the fact that a deaf person cannot hear. Then what deafness may we not all possess? ~ Dune
We need a new ideology with the core values of reason, honesty, science and secular progress over the older traditions of religion, superstition and dogmatic faith that have long defined humanity. We will never be free to progress and advance until the last stone from the last church is cast down onto the last priest. And every equivalent.
-
06-11-2013, 02:48 AM #11
-
06-11-2013, 02:48 AM #12
Gay sex doesn't lead to inbreds. Here's a picture of op's family tree;
Makes eye contact with the webcam when jacking it, just in case
Free Col. Nathan R. Jessup
Furious that the car in Gran Torino wasn't a talking car
Self-diagnosed hypochondriac
Crews handed down by God during a Flintstones Vitamins induced vision
-
-
06-11-2013, 02:48 AM #13
-
06-11-2013, 02:50 AM #14
LOL WHAT. UM yes they are retard. I can't believe you are serious right now.
Most retarded people though are infertile though... but let's say you have some heart defect and you have children. how is that ok and not incest?
incest as i already stated does not always lead to messed up children. it only occurs if you each have a recessive trait that is then expressed. It's not even guaranteed to happenThink you of the fact that a deaf person cannot hear. Then what deafness may we not all possess? ~ Dune
We need a new ideology with the core values of reason, honesty, science and secular progress over the older traditions of religion, superstition and dogmatic faith that have long defined humanity. We will never be free to progress and advance until the last stone from the last church is cast down onto the last priest. And every equivalent.
-
06-11-2013, 02:50 AM #15
-
06-11-2013, 02:51 AM #16
-
-
06-11-2013, 02:52 AM #17
-
06-11-2013, 02:52 AM #18
-
06-11-2013, 02:53 AM #19
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: British Columbia, Canada
- Age: 30
- Posts: 1,002
- Rep Power: 398
Playing devils advocate, but technically speaking, if the incest couple takes precautions (condom/birth control) then the possibility of a pregnancy would drastically reduced. It's also been recorded in history where the CEO10k/day 1000 years ago (for example) used incest to literally "keep it in the family".
***Sunnyvale Trailer Park Crew***
-
06-11-2013, 02:53 AM #20
-
-
06-11-2013, 02:55 AM #21
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: Fenton, Missouri, United States
- Posts: 576
- Rep Power: 845
....................Well I'm speechless
Starting Weight: 310lbs, 41.8% BF 11/2008
First Goal weight: 230, 7/2011, 24% BF
100lbs Down: 210, 2/2012, 17% BF
120lbs Down: 189.6, 7/2012 9.7% BF
Long term Goal: 225, 8-10% BF
No Agony, No Bragony
Would die without sweet potatoes or PB
S2 Faction Crew
Krav Maga Crew
Guitarist Crew
-
06-11-2013, 02:55 AM #22
-
06-11-2013, 02:56 AM #23
That is terrible logic.
The ONLY way a deformed baby will result from brother-sister is if they deliberately have a baby. And if two men phuck and pass on the AIDS virus (most commonly passed by gay sex), then it actually is society's business.
The real answer is that the definition of "right" and "wrong" changes all the time and it's hardly ever based on any logical reasoning. If you can gather up a big enough special interest group, you can make anything acceptable in modern western societies.
-
06-11-2013, 02:57 AM #24
-
-
06-11-2013, 03:01 AM #25
-
06-11-2013, 03:03 AM #26Think you of the fact that a deaf person cannot hear. Then what deafness may we not all possess? ~ Dune
We need a new ideology with the core values of reason, honesty, science and secular progress over the older traditions of religion, superstition and dogmatic faith that have long defined humanity. We will never be free to progress and advance until the last stone from the last church is cast down onto the last priest. And every equivalent.
-
06-11-2013, 03:03 AM #27
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: New Zealand
- Age: 30
- Posts: 15,278
- Rep Power: 54801
-
06-11-2013, 03:05 AM #28
-
-
06-11-2013, 03:06 AM #29
Not fair on the child?
You realise if not for the incest that child would never exist?
I think you'll find that in the vast majority of cases, even people with minor disabilities or deformities would rather be alive than never having been born. And that's assuming the child would be differently ables which is only slightly more likely than with a child with 2 unrealted parents
-
06-11-2013, 03:12 AM #30
The logical reasoning is that if it doesnt hurt anyone else there's no reason for it not to exist. When incestual couples stop being a dumb enough group of people to still produce lots of deformed kids it'll be more accepted but tbh it could just as easily phase out completely since it's more of a byproduct of lonely people who cant help but value reproduction above almost all else not having any choice but to lower their standards beyond what is normally acceptable, and in doing so creates offspring which would be very very unlikely to reproduce themselves.
Evolution baby.
Bookmarks