|
-
04-26-2013, 08:11 PM #361
-
04-26-2013, 08:13 PM #362
-
04-26-2013, 08:14 PM #363
-
04-26-2013, 08:14 PM #364
-
-
04-26-2013, 08:17 PM #365
- Join Date: May 2008
- Location: Melbourne, Vic, Australia
- Age: 35
- Posts: 3,858
- Rep Power: 4398
With the amount of hypothetical you has to insert into your OP, what if this number but it was like this, or this really high number but it was like this blah blah. Really, that just shows that the situation is very case dependent. It matter more on the other details around the number itself. Did she use protection during those adventures? in what time frame did she has sex with those 10 guys, was it within 2 months or 2 years? Were they all with boyfriends or single night clubbing hook ups? The number itself is really irrelevant, unless it was something crazy like 30 or 40 for a girl aged under 25.
-
04-26-2013, 08:19 PM #366
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Posts: 20,904
- Rep Power: 89826
Of course your opinion of him won't change. Women are attracted to men who are preselected by other women. If anything, it helps when a man is known to enjoy the company of many women. It shows his value. This is why men lie to inflate their #.
On the other hand women get no such treatment. Men are naturally put off by women with slooty pasts. If a man wishes to enter into a relation ship, what value is a loose woman that willingly stacks up 20+ partners? Moreover, those men got to have you when you were younger tighter and hotter. This is why women lie to lower their #.
Why is this the case? It all boils down to value.
In order for a man to get laid multiple times it takes game, patience, cunning, humor, and money. All these attributes have real world value.
All a woman needs to get laid is merely a lack of self control. A woman with no self control has zero value.
Modern feminism has taught you that men and women are totally equal on all accounts. Hence the naive OP.***Alabama Crimson Tide***
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Vince Lombardi
-
04-26-2013, 08:21 PM #367
I think it's safe to say that if a girl has had 20 partners, she's unable to love one man. Good luck trying to settle down with a girl that has been run through like a finish line.
*Trading and investing crew*
*Snizzle77 crew*
*sniff hard as fukc when i see Redraider86 post so i can smell her perfume, crew*
*Redraider86 crew*
*Heart skips a beat when I see Redraider86 post crew*
*shrine dedicated to Redraider86 crew*
*saving myself for Redraider86 crew*
-
04-26-2013, 08:22 PM #368
-
-
04-26-2013, 08:23 PM #369
-
04-26-2013, 08:24 PM #370
-
04-26-2013, 08:29 PM #371
Naw I read what he said just fine, he said that the only thing women have going for them is the "purity" of their vaginas, and women who have been giving it away are sluts, but clearly he's an idiot and doesn't understand logic because this definition of a "slut" has very little actual correlation to anything other than the woman being sexually active (not necessarily a lot, she can have sex just 5 times every 2 years and be up to 20 by the time she's 26 if she started at 18.) And lol at calling me a WK... I'm not defending or preaching for girls to be sexually active, I'm simply accepting its premise without any added connotations that don't immediately follow from it, which makes sense given that the question in the OP clearly asked for that.
-
04-26-2013, 08:31 PM #372
-
-
04-26-2013, 08:34 PM #373
-
04-26-2013, 08:55 PM #374
-
04-26-2013, 08:57 PM #375
-
04-26-2013, 09:13 PM #376
Gonna break this down:
The number doesn't matter nearly as much as the detail. Unfortunately 20 relationships is unlikely.
I have only had sex in a relationship. Do I like sex? You're fukking kidding me by asking that. I seriously get boners in public and I am still going through puberty WHILE having excess testosterone in my system.... I wouldn't even consider my sex drive "high", it's beyond that. But just because I like it and I want it doesn't mean that I fuk every chick that I can or even every chick that I find attractive. I have beliefs and self-discipline.
Yes, all of those other qualities are trumped by her being a slut. No, not a number. The fact that she is a sex craving slut without discipline. If I somehow broke my leg and couldn't fuk her for months what's she gonna do? Don't get me wrong...I have no problem with a chick loving sex, but if she can't prove that she can control herself with her track record I am not interested. I believe in being faithful and I actually look for a life long partner-not some chick to date for a short while because I find her hot.
I would not date a chick who has:
1. Cheated. Even at the age of 15. I do not care what the reasoning behind it was or if the "relationship was dying", "he was cheating", etc. You cheat, you are no longer relationship material.
2. Had sex outside of a relationship. I do not care what the reasoning behind it was or if she was "craving it" or "friends with him for a while". If you fit the definition of a slut (look it up if you need to), you are no longer relationship material.
To me the past matters...a lot. I keep my past clean because I want to give my partner the same reassurance that I expect. I can only ask for what I can give... and I believe that is fair. If I had sex outside of a relationship and expected a chick to have not done so I would agree that I am being unrealistic, but since I have kept myself a certain way I believe that it is completely understandable to expect the same in return.
Yes, I understand that the chances are I will never find a girl who meets my standards.
-
-
04-26-2013, 09:19 PM #377
She's probably crying now and feeling the empty void.
I guarantee she will be in denial again and say it doesn't matter but will still lie to her partner about her number
even if she thinks it doesn't matter lol
Imagine how many people got to cum on that, how many times she swallowed, got choked, let someones cock inside her?
if you think that doesn't matter you're beyond any help
-
04-26-2013, 09:20 PM #378
-
04-26-2013, 09:20 PM #379
-
04-26-2013, 09:21 PM #380
-
-
04-26-2013, 09:34 PM #381
-
04-26-2013, 10:21 PM #382
-
04-26-2013, 10:55 PM #383
-
04-26-2013, 11:01 PM #384
-
-
04-26-2013, 11:11 PM #385
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Age: 30
- Posts: 146
- Rep Power: 304
Feminist propaganda of peace... Stop acting like 'its just sex'... Its probably the most private and intimate thing you can do with another human being and if you're slooting around with a multiple number of guys, that shows me you don't have any self respect and that you're a typical YOLO SWAG club sloot
-
04-26-2013, 11:23 PM #386
-
04-26-2013, 11:23 PM #387
I'd feel insecure if a girl I was dating had slept with 20+ guys lol. That's pretty much saying she liked to be treated like a piece of meat and can get sex whenever she wants which would not make her very trustworthy to me. Like some miscer mentioned earlier, if I got hurt or something and couldn't do much sexually for a month is she gonna be craving the cawk so hard that she cheats on me? I'd always be worried that she would leave me for another dude too since girls I've met like this are always "accidentally" flirty and lead every guy they talk to on. Just not worth it to date overall.
-
04-26-2013, 11:23 PM #388
I'm gonna address this since I agree with the idea that I wouldn't date a chick who has banged a black guy.
Think about pit bulls. Pit bulls in it of themselves aren't bad dogs, they're actually pretty nice. Owning a pit bull doesn't make a person a douche bag. But the type of person who specifically goes out looking to buy a pit bull for a specific reason (because pits are macho, bad ass, alpha dogs) is a douche bag. Douche bag pit owners outnumber non-douche bags so in the end I would say that generally pit bull owners are douche bags.
My point is that the idea of a white chick banging a black guy in it of itself doesn't bother me, but the type of white chick who specifically goes after black guys (because they sexual tyrannosaures) repulses me. Unfortunetaly mud-sharks (as they are called) outnumber women who are metaphorically color-blind so therefore I lump them all together as sloots.
no racist and no negs please
-
-
04-26-2013, 11:26 PM #389
-
04-26-2013, 11:29 PM #390
1. There is no dealbreaker number just for a girlfriend, it could be in the hundreds and I'm okay with dating her long term. Once marriage and more serious stuff is on the table things change. It's not perfectly linear, and as you alluded to context matters. If she's had 10 partners and they were all bfs and relatively decent guys I can overlook that. Yes, the character of the guys also matters. If she's shown taste in scumbags who are the types of fellas who would sleep with married women that's much worse than 10 doting betaboy WKs. If she has 10 impulsive one night stands that's worse still than 10 LTRs.
2. People have different levels of desire for variety, and I think women are even more rangey than men in this regard By having a lot of partners she demonstrates this and will have a greater temptation and propensity to stray. If she's just my gf, yes this hurts but ultimately there's no devastating life consequences like custody/assets.
3. Men cheat, women betray. Yes, of course its bad when men or women cheat, but when women do it its simply more damaging and says more about the quality of the relationship than when a man does it. When men stray, they tend to withdraw from their main partner much less, and they tend to do it in the romantic/emotional way. When women cheat, they withdraw a lot and they withdraw sexually as well as romantically. A man will still be giving it to his main girl even if he's got a mistress on the side. He might not be buying flowers or doing romantic dinners anymore, but he's still going to be giving it to her. When a woman strays, she usually loses interest in her "official" bf and is reluctant to address his sexual needs.
4. You can't ignore past behavior in assessing somebody's current behavioral propensities, that's just illogical.Last edited by disgorge89; 04-26-2013 at 11:40 PM.
Bookmarks