Just to hear some opinions about these terrible situations.
|
-
04-15-2013, 08:26 PM #1
-
04-15-2013, 08:30 PM #2
-
04-15-2013, 08:30 PM #3
-
04-15-2013, 08:31 PM #4
-
-
04-15-2013, 08:34 PM #5
-
04-15-2013, 08:36 PM #6
Wow wtf is this bullshyt read this article guys what a phucking ******* alex jones is.
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/alex..._a_false_flag/
-
04-15-2013, 08:40 PM #7
no, not even in the slightest.
What does the government have to gain by hiring a guy to act insane and shoot 20 children and 6 teachers in a random city in America? Seriously, answer that.
And for the boston bombings. Not even once.
The way the bombs were positioned, and certain points, and in places where it seemed to have been shunned away from the average passer by. It's an act of terrorism in my eyes. But not from the government.
It's so dumb that people create these false conspiracy theories that governement is behind everything.
and as for Alex Jones. Don't pay him any attention. He does what he does and says what he says because it gets him fame, viewers, more popularity, and above all, more money.
The absolute only reason why piers morgan brought alex jones onto his show was for money and ratings. Piers Morgan Tonight was slipping in the ratings, and was being threatened by cnn to be put on a later time date. SO they brough Alex Jones in, and wallah, instant ratings from a fiery crazy lunatic guy who thinks he has every piece of classified data in his extremist libertarian actually more like anarchist brain.cool
-
04-15-2013, 08:40 PM #8
-
-
04-15-2013, 08:42 PM #9
-
04-15-2013, 08:43 PM #10
-
04-15-2013, 08:50 PM #11
-
04-15-2013, 08:51 PM #12
-
-
04-15-2013, 08:56 PM #13
-
04-15-2013, 09:01 PM #14
-
04-15-2013, 09:03 PM #15
-
04-15-2013, 09:05 PM #16
What do they have to gain? I'm just curious, because Like I can't think of anything except maybe doing this so that Obama could push an agenda for stricter gun control laws so therefore he has something to be remembered by besides ObamaCare.
But surely he would know gun control would never pass through congress right? He has to know that. Too many blue dog democrats are afraid of losing their job during midterms if they vote for gun control.
but that's the only reason why I could think that it would be a gov job nom saying.cool
-
-
04-15-2013, 09:07 PM #17
-
04-15-2013, 09:08 PM #18
-
04-15-2013, 09:10 PM #19
right now what I'm hearing based off of some articles i'm reading online and just recently checked on cnn.
Alot of Liberals are saying it was right wing traditionalists who didn't want to pay taxes.
And someone even commented on a cnn article on the boston bombing saying , " Our country needs us, how many republicans and conservatives have you gotten rid of today?"
So Retarded -_-cool
-
04-15-2013, 09:13 PM #20
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Maryland Heights, Missouri, United States
- Age: 30
- Posts: 9,156
- Rep Power: 24877
Swole, on my phone so not going to quote.
During times of uncertainty and fear people are more likely to give up their civil liberties for an increase in perceived safety. This equates to an increase in governmental power.
I could go into many examples of this, but I don't have the time as I'm currently writing a paper due tomorrow.✄✄ MFC Arts and Crafts Director ✄✄
-
-
04-15-2013, 09:15 PM #21
-
04-15-2013, 09:16 PM #22
-
04-15-2013, 09:23 PM #23
-
04-15-2013, 09:24 PM #24
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 29
- Posts: 1,487
- Rep Power: 0
Probably us gov did it to initiate conflict with North Korea, to go to war. Like bush with 9/11. American government is fking shet, everyone is fake.
"If you're ABSENT during my struggle, don't expect to be PRESENT during my success."
Current stats:
Bench 195x3
Squat 305x1
Deadlift 405x1
*** Join my log and support me : http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=154287671 ***
-
-
04-15-2013, 09:27 PM #25
I doubt it with Gun Control.
That is a lost cause. Even democrats won't or are hesitant to vote in favor of it. They know they will lose their seat if they do, especially those blue dog democrats in the southern and bible states. Plus the conservative and NRA influence is strong, and Obama knows this could quickly backfire on him. That's why if you listen closely to his conferences and televised speeches on gun control, he never uses the word "control", instead he says "gun violence." because he knows by saying gun control that immidietaly he will create an uproar among many. Which is true.
So in terms of gun control, he has everything to lose and little to gain.
But I could understand the thoery of gov. adding of more checkpoints and a perceived notion of more protection under the government in exchange for some civil liberties. That would equate to more power yes. But isn't there also too many checks and balances the pres would have to go through to even get this approved?
like Benjamin Franklin said
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"cool
-
04-15-2013, 09:33 PM #26
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Maryland Heights, Missouri, United States
- Age: 30
- Posts: 9,156
- Rep Power: 24877
Ex. Patriot Act
I guess there aren't enough checks and balances huh
As far as gun control is concerned, read this:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson...rough-the-sena
This may or may not be true, but it shows a few of the many things that can be/have been gained.✄✄ MFC Arts and Crafts Director ✄✄
-
04-15-2013, 09:47 PM #27
-
04-15-2013, 09:50 PM #28
-
-
04-15-2013, 09:52 PM #29
-
04-15-2013, 09:55 PM #30
Of course the government has a reason, this can be a reason to really tighten gun laws and chemical laws which obstruct freedom. But i doubt they caused it, however they could use to media to really highlight it and make it viral, since these things aren't that rare, people are killed everyday, multiple people at one time even.
I rep back
Bookmarks