Reply
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Registered User schnauzers's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Ontario, Canada
    Posts: 2,586
    Rep Power: 2803
    schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    schnauzers is offline

    Bulking: necessary to 'eat back' calories?

    I've read that when people ask about eating back calories they burn doing activity (ie cardio) during a cut they are told NOT to eat back the calories that they supposedly burn. This is because the activity factor in the calculation takes care of the extra calories burned during activity. Also because they may over estimate how much they burn and will end up eating back too many calories so that they won't be in a deficit any more.

    Does the same rule apply during a bulk? Should I not eat back calories that I may burn doing activity on top of my weight training? I don't do cardio 'on purpose' but I play squash. When I decided to start bulking I dropped all HIIT and limited the amount of squash that I play. However, I find that I need to play more than one game a week of squash in order to practice and improve my skills. If I add more squash games during the week should I: eat back some calories on days that I play--how many extra? OR should I just recalculate the calories I need to eat using a higher activity factor even though I may not play extra games consistently?

    Thanks.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Stingin' Belle KCBiggs's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2008
    Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Posts: 868
    Rep Power: 6623
    KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000) KCBiggs is a name known to all. (+5000)
    KCBiggs is offline
    I think it would be simpler to just aim for weekly weight gain (say for example 0.5-1lb) and increase calories if you're not hitting this target. Compensating for lost calories can be confusing and inaccurate as you might be burning less/more than you think.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User acrawlingchaos's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2011
    Location: New Hampshire, United States
    Age: 47
    Posts: 16,398
    Rep Power: 150402
    acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) acrawlingchaos has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    acrawlingchaos is offline
    I don't understand why anyone bothers with activity modifiers. You over-complicate a simple process.



    Use a static intake (~), if you are trying to bulk and not adding weight, add calories. If you are trying to lose weight, decrease current intake.

    It really is that simple.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User Botika's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Australia
    Posts: 14,512
    Rep Power: 359276
    Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Botika has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Botika is offline
    Pick a calorie level and eat the same amount each day, for a couple weeks. Track your weight over this some and if you are:
    A) still losing increase your calories,
    B) maintaining increase your calories,
    C) gaining moderately keep your calories the same, or
    D) gaining excessively reduce your calories.

    I reverse dieted up until I was gaining each week.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User schnauzers's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Ontario, Canada
    Posts: 2,586
    Rep Power: 2803
    schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) schnauzers is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    schnauzers is offline
    Alright, that clears it up....just eat even MORE!

    Truthfully, I don't rely on the calculators all that much as it put my maintenance around 2550 (IIRC) and I'm eating 3000+ and haven't gained weight for a few weeks now. I do realize that the calcs are just an estimate and that there's a huge YMMV element to this. Just want to make sure that I'm not screwing myself over by sweating it up on the squash court a few days a week. Solution = eat more, I like that Thanks.
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Bulking Question
    By adnan5224 in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-27-2012, 12:01 PM
  2. Do I need to eat just before bed during bulk?
    By leviterande in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-21-2012, 12:35 PM
  3. Bulking info
    By importguyr34 in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-14-2011, 12:10 PM
  4. Bulking v Cutting v Maintenance
    By 00gie_b00gie in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-26-2009, 03:44 PM
  5. Bulking: An Excuse to Eat Crap & Get Fat?
    By NaturalMsO in forum Nutrition
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 08-14-2007, 05:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts