So I've been doing IF for a while. First I did recomp at +20% workout days, and -20% on rest days. I did this for a few months and while I didn't lose much more than 4 pounds over 3 months, I increased my strength and changed the shape and body fat on my body. This past month I switched to -10% on workout days, and -30% on rest days. This is causing me to not lose strength, but stall on strength. I have lost a few pounds by using this cutting pattern, but I don't like the fact that my strength has stalled. I know most consider this an inevitable part of the cutting process, but hear me out.
I might be thinking of this completely the wrong way, but what if I were to eat at +20% on workout days? This would mean for me a maintenance of 2100. So I'd be eating about 2500 calories on my workout days. This is 3 days a week, so 500 calories above maintenance each day, giving me 1500 extra calories for the week if I were to eat maintenance the rest of the week.
Then on my rest days, I were to eat at -45% of my TDEE. This would be around 1100 calories. If I ate that the remainder of the week, so 4 days, I would be -4000 calories. This would leave me total at -2500 calories for the week. This would give me about 0.7 lbs of weight lost each week, which isn't too slow.
My question is by doing this would I be able to increase in strength at all if I'm getting the calories I need on my workout days, and yet on off days going so far below my TDEE?
I do not have a problem hitting 0.7 - 1 gram of protein every day, even with 1100 calories available to me.
Just let me know if I'm being an idiot and thinking about this the wrong way.
|
-
03-28-2013, 08:11 PM #1
IF +20% workout days, -45% rest days?!
-
03-28-2013, 08:45 PM #2
-
03-28-2013, 11:06 PM #3
Slow down there buddy. you have to appreciate this guys attentiveness to detail. bodybuilding is all about the small details repeated day after day. sometimes you have to be meticulous to meet your goals. all i have to say to you derrick is its sounds like your doing it right. keep these changes and see what happens, but its asking a lot to see gains in strength in size while cutting. i would be content with the plateau you have going
-
03-28-2013, 11:41 PM #4
-
-
03-29-2013, 12:31 AM #5
-
03-29-2013, 04:23 AM #6
-
03-29-2013, 04:25 AM #7
-
03-29-2013, 04:29 AM #8
-
-
03-29-2013, 04:42 AM #9
Another good point. Muscles and strength gains are not made in the gym.
Gym to work them.
Kitchen to feed them.
Rest to repair/grow them.
I understand you want to cut OP, but consuming such low amounts of calories is actually counterproductive. - 5%-20% of your TDEE for a cut. Start lower so you have room to reduce more. If you stall look into controlled refeeds.Platform Supplemets:
Controlled Labs Orange Triad & Oximega
Allmax Creapture Creatine
-
03-29-2013, 09:23 AM #10
seriously you negged me? you clearly dont understand IF. the point of it is to get your body to rely on its own bodyfat for energy you idiot. so a 45% calorie deficit may be extreme but for a 146lb individual 1100 isnt the most intense caloric limit for intermittent fasting. im not saying a 45% deficit is necessary but if he didnt lose any weight on a 20% deficit then he could decrease it more. you suck man
-
03-29-2013, 09:40 AM #11
-
03-29-2013, 09:43 AM #12
-
-
03-29-2013, 10:12 AM #13
-
03-29-2013, 10:37 AM #14
-
03-29-2013, 10:39 AM #15
-
03-29-2013, 10:52 AM #16
-
-
03-29-2013, 10:55 AM #17
-
03-29-2013, 11:24 AM #18
-
03-29-2013, 11:30 AM #19
-
03-29-2013, 12:20 PM #20
-
-
03-29-2013, 12:27 PM #21
-
03-29-2013, 12:32 PM #22
"This past month I switched to -10% on workout days, and -30% on rest days. This is causing me to not lose strength, but stall on strength. I have lost a few pounds by using this cutting pattern"
Read the OP before you comment next time. I was losing weight. I was not on a -20% deficit. Everything in this post is wrong.
-
03-29-2013, 01:05 PM #23
-
03-29-2013, 01:52 PM #24
Your body doesn't work one day at a time. You don't enter starvation mode after one day. If you need 2000 calories a day, and you fast for one day, and eat 4000 calories the next, then you are getting the necessary calories for your body.
Please. Please. Please. Please read and comprehend what people say. I said I do not intend to do it, because I DID listen to your advice. I am disputing the fact that you believe that our body needs constant fueling. It doesn't need to be constantly fueled even to build muscle. Muscle doesn't begin to deteriorate that rapidly. I'm proof of that, considering I used to fast 20 hours a day, and eat for 4 hours. Training fasted, and I gained muscle.
-
-
03-29-2013, 02:34 PM #25
-
03-29-2013, 02:50 PM #26
this whole thread is fail...
I did skim through something recently about eat, stop, eat. had something to do with fasting for up to 24 hours. OP, there may be something to your PROPOSED method. I am sorry that I don't know enough to answer that. But I would like to point out such methods do exist and I don't think anyone in this thread has really helped point you in a good direction, thus far.
-
03-29-2013, 03:11 PM #27
-
03-29-2013, 04:52 PM #28
-
-
03-29-2013, 05:16 PM #29
-
03-29-2013, 05:36 PM #30
Bookmarks