Ive been looking into doing some time under tension workouts for a little muscle confusion but i havent looked much into it.. For those who dont know its basically times sets and reps are more slow and gradual
Does anyone have any experiences with Time under Tension??
|
Thread: Time under tension??
-
03-25-2013, 05:39 AM #1
-
03-25-2013, 05:42 AM #2
-
03-25-2013, 05:48 AM #3
-
03-25-2013, 06:17 AM #4
-
-
03-25-2013, 06:18 AM #5
I know BPak likes sets that consist of 8 reps with 4 second negatives, so your muscles are under tension for around 40 seconds each set, while still pushing a pretty big amount of weight since you only need 8 reps. I've tried doing stuff like that for compound movements, and I find it works great, strength went up, better development.
-
03-25-2013, 08:50 AM #6
-
03-25-2013, 09:24 AM #7"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!"
� Hunter S. Thompson
Live fast, die young, and leave a jacked and tan corpse.
Best lifts
Squat- 500
Bench-390
Deadlift-635
-
03-25-2013, 09:30 AM #8
-
-
03-25-2013, 11:16 AM #9"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!"
� Hunter S. Thompson
Live fast, die young, and leave a jacked and tan corpse.
Best lifts
Squat- 500
Bench-390
Deadlift-635
-
03-25-2013, 12:21 PM #10
-
03-25-2013, 12:29 PM #11
-
03-25-2013, 12:29 PM #12
-
-
03-25-2013, 12:32 PM #13
Time under tension is a useful tool because it focuses on the eccentric portion of the lift. And muscle confusion is bull****.
What I would do on lifts like the bench press, squat, OHP, pullups, dips, and many more is do 1.5-2 second negatives. Although you should probably already be doing them on the squats (this is the prime reason why people get so lowerbody-heavy on SS).
But don't focus on the negative on things like the deadlift. There really isn't a negative for deads.
-
03-25-2013, 12:56 PM #14
-
03-25-2013, 02:33 PM #15
-
03-25-2013, 06:24 PM #16
-
-
03-25-2013, 08:33 PM #17
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: New Zealand
- Age: 30
- Posts: 15,278
- Rep Power: 54801
From someone who's tried super slow reps, it sucks ass. Honestly, don't do it IMO. Waste of time.
It's not common knowledge. At least not on here. If you think it is IRL then I'm afraid the people around you don't seem to quite know what they're doing. You don't need to frequently change routines. When you adapt to being able to do a lift for x reps, change things up by adding weight and trying to get as many reps, or keep the weight the same and try to get more reps. The only changes people should make to their routines are
1) when they feel they're no longer in novice/intermediate/whatever stage of their training, and want an appropriate routine, eg you wouldn't recommend Konstantine do Starting Strength
2) when you make small adjustments to your training in volume/exercise selection/rep range/rest/form/tempo/frequency/etc as you seek to slowly but surely get closer and closer to what works best for you.
3) as a response to injury.
Muscle confusion is a myth.'People are gonna remember me as a god forever... Like-like-like Troy, like Chiles heel, I'm a god forever I'll be remembered for thousands of years to come' - Jason Genova
Texas Method Mod: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=171537443&p=1444534723&viewfull=1#post1444534723
-
03-25-2013, 08:39 PM #18
-
03-25-2013, 08:56 PM #19
So by you saying there's no such thing as muscle confusion. Does that mean someone could stay on the same routine for 1 year and get the same results as changing your routine every 3 months for a year? Or does that fall into a different category?
It's all about tricking the body after all, isn't it? Introducing new techniques and exercises for your muscles to adapt to, then change it up again?
(not starting an arguing, just asking a few questions)
-
03-25-2013, 09:16 PM #20
-
-
03-26-2013, 08:58 AM #21
-
03-27-2013, 07:48 AM #22
You half agreed with what I just said.
Also, I think it depends it depends on the person's goals if they need to move up in weight, or change routines. So maybe not a myth, just something not highly looked upon. Alright, and I agree that maybe the knowledge of it is not so common knowledge, but it would be better if it was. My opinion.Last edited by Kev1029; 03-27-2013 at 07:54 AM.
Stats:
Deadlift: 520 1RM
Squat: 455 1RM
Bench: 2801RM
Overhead Press: 200 1RM
Similar Threads
-
Time Under Tension
By FJ and G in forum Over Age 35Replies: 28Last Post: 08-15-2013, 12:22 PM -
The Effects of Time Under Tension Exercises
By rlittle621 in forum ExercisesReplies: 14Last Post: 01-25-2013, 05:29 PM -
A question about time under tension?
By B3yondBrawn in forum ExercisesReplies: 5Last Post: 11-16-2005, 01:46 AM -
time under tension and rep ranges
By unclejeff in forum ExercisesReplies: 43Last Post: 07-04-2005, 05:48 PM -
Reps vs time under tension - their interplay?
By nickk23 in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 24Last Post: 12-16-2003, 01:29 AM
Bookmarks