Reply
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User jeremyjeremy91's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Posts: 12
    Rep Power: 0
    jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) jeremyjeremy91 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    jeremyjeremy91 is offline

    Question regarding raw vs cooked food weight

    When it comes to figuring out nutritional values of certain foods; mainly types that have a significant difference in weight when raw and when cooked, how does one know which the nutritional value refers to? Is it accurate to weigh when raw or when cooked. Chicken for example could weigh 5.5oz raw and after its cooked weigh roughly only 3oz. Bit of a difference when trying to figure out the macros in that breast when the nutrition says per 100g.
    Thanks in advance!
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User chameleonism's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2011
    Location: Virginia, United States
    Posts: 1,002
    Rep Power: 1728
    chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000) chameleonism is just really nice. (+1000)
    chameleonism is offline
    Originally Posted by jeremyjeremy91 View Post
    When it comes to figuring out nutritional values of certain foods; mainly types that have a significant difference in weight when raw and when cooked, how does one know which the nutritional value refers to? Is it accurate to weigh when raw or when cooked. Chicken for example could weigh 5.5oz raw and after its cooked weigh roughly only 3oz. Bit of a difference when trying to figure out the macros in that breast when the nutrition says per 100g.
    Thanks in advance!
    Just use the raw values. The cooked weight will vary.

    http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/...products/701/2
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Officially Resurrected pduke1's Avatar
    Join Date: Aug 2003
    Location: Virginia, United States
    Age: 41
    Posts: 447
    Rep Power: 252
    pduke1 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) pduke1 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) pduke1 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) pduke1 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) pduke1 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) pduke1 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) pduke1 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    pduke1 is offline
    Originally Posted by jeremyjeremy91 View Post
    When it comes to figuring out nutritional values of certain foods; mainly types that have a significant difference in weight when raw and when cooked, how does one know which the nutritional value refers to? Is it accurate to weigh when raw or when cooked. Chicken for example could weigh 5.5oz raw and after its cooked weigh roughly only 3oz. Bit of a difference when trying to figure out the macros in that breast when the nutrition says per 100g.
    Thanks in advance!
    Just throw it on the scale after its cooked. The weight change is typically due to evaporation of water.
    - Duke
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    #winning NDeeps27's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2011
    Location: United States
    Age: 30
    Posts: 1,110
    Rep Power: 1192
    NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000) NDeeps27 is just really nice. (+1000)
    NDeeps27 is offline
    Be consistent
    I try to weight raw when possible (more accurate) but 80% of the time have to weigh cooked
    Remember..Cooked calories PER OZ is more than raw calories PER OZ

    The macros don't change..its not different chicken..just differnt weight means adjusting cals/gram
    can't out train a bad diet

    can't out diet bad training
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User deschet13's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2011
    Age: 44
    Posts: 13
    Rep Power: 0
    deschet13 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) deschet13 has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    deschet13 is offline
    If you eat the whole pack of chicken, in say a week, then it doesn't really matter how much it weighs. What I mean is if you bought a 7lb pack of breasts and ate all of it over the next seven days then it doesn't really matter. You know you averaged 1lb a day. In the end it won't matter if you ate 1.25lbs one day and then only ate .75lbs the next day. Personally, I have found tracking what I eat by averaging it out over a week makes me feel a lot less psychotic about my foods.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User ASTRONOMICAL's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2012
    Posts: 299
    Rep Power: 298
    ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50) ASTRONOMICAL will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    ASTRONOMICAL is offline
    Originally Posted by deschet13 View Post
    If you eat the whole pack of chicken, in say a week, then it doesn't really matter how much it weighs. What I mean is if you bought a 7lb pack of breasts and ate all of it over the next seven days then it doesn't really matter. You know you averaged 1lb a day. In the end it won't matter if you ate 1.25lbs one day and then only ate .75lbs the next day. Personally, I have found tracking what I eat by averaging it out over a week makes me feel a lot less psychotic about my foods.
    Originally Posted by chameleonism View Post
    Just use the raw values. The cooked weight will vary.
    ^^^This.... The other responses clearly don't understand caloric density. Lets illustrate via some simple math. If a 5oz chicken breast has 50 grams of protein (hypothetical,) and after cooking it weighs 3oz, how much protein will each oz have? 10 grams? **** no! Each ounce now has 16.6 grams of protein. Make sense?
    if anything has surprised me so far in my work, it's the complete disassociation between IQ and "exercise intelligence"

    -Martin Berkhan
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts