The End of Sex: How Hookup Culture is Leaving a Generation Unhappy

[SYRIANKID]

I think a promiscuous lifestyle or any other lifestyle that someone chooses may not be fulfilling to you, but you're not them.

According to this book, it's not fulfilling to the thousands of random people who were interviewed. They thought it would be, they pretended it was, but admitted privately that they regretted it and it left them feeling empty and unfulfilled. They said they did it out of peer-pressure.

People who bitch about others getting laid usually aren't getting laid themselves..thats why they're so bitchy.

People who want others to stop smoking just secretly wish they were addicted to smoking or that they could enjoy that smooth, smooth smoke down their lungs.

[Kurd4evah]

not always

For sure not always, but it is usually from those that have left that life style, People who only enjoy and look at there wives and and not every women that appears in front of them or pornography etc...

[tk217]

According to this book, it's not fulfilling to the thousands of random people who were interviewed. They thought it would be, they pretended it was, but admitted privately that they regretted it and it left them feeling empty and unfulfilled. They said they did it out of peer-pressure.



People who want others to stop smoking just secretly wish they were addicted to smoking or that they could enjoy that smooth, smooth smoke down their lungs.

lol

sk is being funny. ;D

[BenZowman]

People never make poor life choices. On top of that, everyone should learn from personal mistakes and not from the collective wisdom of people who have been burned.

Suggesting I am a poor life choice and a mistake

[SYRIANKID]

Suggesting I am a poor life choice and a mistake

No, brah, NO, don't do that to yourself. This is all about you. Think of all those lonely girls with self-esteem problems and no father figure in their lives, they need you. You're fornicating with them out of the goodness of your heart. And what do you get out of it, anyway? Why else would a guy like you want that stressful lifestyle with no strings attached? Don't let a bunch of jealous prudes stop you from your humanitarian work.

We only hope that one day, should your daughter or sister ever find themselves in need of emotional support, that a self-less guy like you will pump them full of therapy for a night. This generation is in great hands.

[Weightaholic]

point is it ruins marriages, long term.

Please, feel free to provide proof at any point you like.

[kel_varnsen]

casual sex and a random hook up culture is incompatible with stable, long term relationships. it is naive to think they can be combined ("i.e. go through a slutty period, then settle down...."). the result is the destruction of the nuclear family which has always been essential to any culture's stability and growth. once the nuclear family is destabilized, you end up with single moms, ostracized and frustrated beta males, bastard kids etc. all of which hurt society as a whole.

[lasher]

No, brah, NO, don't do that to yourself. This is all about you. Think of all those lonely girls with self-esteem problems and no father figure in their lives, they need you. You're fornicating with them out of the goodness of your heart. And what do you get out of it, anyway? Why else would a guy like you want that stressful lifestyle with no strings attached? Don't let a bunch of jealous prudes stop you from your humanitarian work.

We only hope that one day, should your daughter or sister ever find themselves in need of emotional support, that a self-less guy like you will pump them full of therapy for a night. This generation is in great hands.

[im..g]http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/images/GifGuide/clapping/358bgh5.jpg.gif[/img]

epic.

Pretty sure SK just owned everyone ITT, both in literal truth and witty humor (excluding myself, of course).

[tuved]

This is very strange. People who believe in a holy book arguing that it is wrong. Holy book says men can take sex slaves and some guys had 300 women in their harem. Some get sold to different men.
When modern men and women do it out of their desire, it becomes very wrong and will hurt their esteem etc.
What about the self esteem of those millions of women who were carried away to be sex slaves?
Those acts and religious laws are not condemned. Strange...

[lasher]

This is very strange. People who believe in a holy book arguing that it is wrong. Holy book says men can take sex slaves and some guys had 300 women in their harem. some get sold to different men.
When modern men and do it out of their desire, it becomes very wrong and will hurt their esteem etc.
What about the self esteem of those millions of men who were carried away to be sex slaves?
Those acts and religious laws are not condemned. Strange...

Yes, let's ignore the actual argument and words of the OP and focus on something he didn't bring up at all. Surely there is no logical fallacy in this form of argumentation.

[Spartan5364]

Please, feel free to provide proof at any point you like.

lmao theres plenty of proof of that, it's just common sense if you look at western society.

Here is a study saying the more sexual partners a woman had, the less likely she is to remain faithful in a monogamous relationship.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/...ty-part-2.html

Each additional sexual partner increased the odds of infidelity by 7% while increasing years of education seem to decrease the risk by 10%.

[tuved]

Yes, let's ignore the actual argument and words of the OP and focus on something he didn't bring up at all. Surely there is no logical fallacy in this form of argumentation.

We only hope that one day, should your daughter or sister ever find themselves in need of emotional support, that a self-less guy like you will pump them full of therapy for a night. This generation is in great hands.

Ok, sex slavery for all those sisters and daughters were/is right? Funny!!!!!

[flairon]

According to this book, it's not fulfilling to the thousands of random people who were interviewed. They thought it would be, they pretended it was, but admitted privately that they regretted it and it left them feeling empty and unfulfilled. They said they did it out of peer-pressure.



People who want others to stop smoking just secretly wish they were addicted to smoking or that they could enjoy that smooth, smooth smoke down their lungs.

Yeah, but there are thousands of random people who aren't happy or fullfilled with life in general. In today's environment everything is all about instant gratification. For some people that works fine, for some people not so much, but that probably has more to do with environmental/social influences when they are growing up than anything else.

People who want others to stop smoking really just want to be able to wield control over others.

It's nobody else's business what someone does with their body or how they live their life. Just because its not to your standards doesn't mean anything, you aren't them.

[Harbinger]

That's the first time I've had to look up a word in a while.

Did he edit something out, which word didn't you know?

[flairon]

For sure not always, but it is usually from those that have left that life style, People who only enjoy and look at there wives and and not every women that appears in front of them or pornography etc...

There is no man that really enjoys only looking at their wives and their wives only. There is a difference between looking and acting on it.

This sounds like muslim garbage...the same group that worships a man that marries little girls and is so scared that another man will end up invading the vagina they think is theirs that they beat and kill the women because they don't have the balls to step to the man.

[lasher]

Ok, sex slavery for all those sisters and daughters were/is right? Funny!!!!!

You're retarded, srs. He was making a satirical comment in response to BenZowman's satirical comment.

Did he edit something out, which word didn't you know?

insouciant

[tuved]

You're retarded, srs. He was making a satirical comment in response to BenZowman's satirical comment.

Well a guy wishes someone else's sisters and daughter be pumped with therapy all night because he thinks sleeping around is wrong but thinks it's perfectly ok for for all those millions of sisters, wives and daughters that were carrried away for sex slavery.

You are retarded to support him and applaud him as well...

[lasher]

Well a guy wishes someone else's sisters and daughter be pumped with therapy all night because he thinks sleeping around is wrong but thinks it's perfectly ok for for all those millions of sisters, wives and daughters that were carrried away for sex slavery.

You are retarded to support him and applaud him as well...

I suppose I should have learned by now not to dialogue with special needs posters with no reading comprehension skills.

Oh well, lesson learned again.

[tuved]

I suppose I should have learned by now not to dialogue with special needs posters with no reading comprehension skills.

Oh well, lesson learned again.

Ok..according to you insulting is the best way to respond...

[lasher]

Ok..according to you insulting is the best way to respond...

Just calling it like it is little buddy. It was clearly explained to you that his comment was satire in response to satire. You still want to be an idiot about it. So yes, insulting you at that point is the best way to respond.

[tuved]

Just calling it like it is little buddy. It was clearly explained to you that his comment was satire in response to satire. You still want to be an idiot about it. So yes, insulting you at that point is the best way to respond.

Haven't any real points to counter?
You started a non-argument and thought you were great. It turns out you are the idiot. And continue sucking up.
Yes, insults will get you insults...

[lasher]

Haven't any real points to counter?
Yu started a no-argument and thought you were great. It turns out you are the idiot. And continue sucking up.
Yes, insults will get you insults...

You didn't make any points to counter. You made a completely off topic remark that you thought was clever, but which actually had nothing at all to do with what SK posted, and you were called out for it. Then you confused a satirical post of SK's and made a fool of yourself. After that was pointed out to you, you continued to make a fool of yourself.

Keep hustlin' cuz.

[tuved]

You didn't make any points to counter. You made a completely off topic remark that you thought was clever, but which actually had nothing at all to do with what SK posted, and you were called out for it. Then you confused a satirical post of SK's and made a fool of yourself. After that was pointed out to you, you continued to make a fool of yourself.

Keep hustlin' cuz.

So the clever man that you are assumed I posted something that had nothing to do with what SK posted.
It turned out that you were a fool because you were sucking up, you got upset and then thought it best to continue arguing like a fool.

[lasher]

So the clever man that you are assumed I posted something that had nothing to do with what SK posted.

It had nothing to do with what he posted. It was a poor man's Tu quoque fallacy, nothing more. Grow up and learn to address peoples' actual arguments and you won't have this problem.

It turned out that you were a fool because you were sucking up, you got upset and then thought it best to continue arguing like a fool.

wut.

Dude, just stop.

[tuved]

It had nothing to do with what he posted. It was a poor man's Tu quoque fallacy, nothing more. Grow up and learn to address peoples' actual arguments and you won't have this problem.

There were more intelligent reviews on what Donna's book was about. Henry just used that book to continue bashing gays and jews.

I did perfectly right by exposing that Henry Makow is a gay basher and jew hater, in line with OP's thinking.

Next OP, who insists that God gave rights to his people to take away millions of wives, daughters and sisters into sexual slavery, finds promiscuity very wrong!!!

Very right in pointing out that too...

[SYRIANKID]

There were more intelligent reviews on what Donna's book was about. Henry just used that book to continue bashing gays and jews.

I did perfectly right by exposing that Henry Makow is a gay basher and jew hater, in line with OP's thinking.

Next OP, who insists that God gave rights to his people to take away millions of wives, daughters and sisters into sexual slavery, finds promiscuity very wrong!!!

Very right in pointing out that too...

Nobody cares about Makow, he's just the messenger. Talking about him is a logical fallacy called "poisoning the well". The topic is about promiscuity, its effects on society, and whether it is a neutral or harmful lifestyle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well

Either way, he's Jewish himself and he does bash homosexual promiscuity, because he considers the homosexual lifestyle to be inherently (and statistically) promiscuous whereas heterosexual relationships, even on a bad day, are traditionally less promiscuous. But they are both converging since you kids these days are watching too much MTV and lady gaga or whatever it is you do.

[tuved]

It had nothing to do with what he posted. It was a poor man's Tu quoque fallacy, nothing more. Grow up and learn to address peoples' actual arguments and you won't have this problem.

wut.

Dude, just stop.

The OP was being mistaken, by many who came to the thread, to have been written by Donna whereas they were all the gay and jew hating Henry Makow's words.

The reader was also being led to believe that Donna had written promiscuity was the reason for homosexuality in her book.

Edited out from the article were portions that revealed Henry Makow's jew hate too.

The thread was to make people think that a book, written by an erudite woman of the 21st Century, was in line with OP's religion and thinking - homosexuality and promiscuity are wrong. While many of what was in the book may be or may not be right, Henry Makow's article is not the one, an intelligent guy will refer to, to read a review of the book.

[sawoobley]

No, brah, NO, don't do that to yourself. This is all about you. Think of all those lonely girls with self-esteem problems and no father figure in their lives, they need you. You're fornicating with them out of the goodness of your heart. And what do you get out of it, anyway? Why else would a guy like you want that stressful lifestyle with no strings attached? Don't let a bunch of jealous prudes stop you from your humanitarian work.

We only hope that one day, should your daughter or sister ever find themselves in need of emotional support, that a self-less guy like you will pump them full of therapy for a night. This generation is in great hands.

lol

epic.

Pretty sure SK just owned everyone ITT, both in literal truth and witty humor (excluding myself, of course).

this

[SYRIANKID]

The OP was being mistaken, by many who came to the thread, to have been written by Donna whereas they were all the gay and jew hating Henry Makow's words.

Were you tricked even though the first thing you see in the OP is a url link to henry makow's website, which he has sneakily called "henry makow dot com"? No tricks here buddy, just treats.

[tuved]

Nobody cares about Makow, he's just the messenger. Talking about him is a logical fallacy called "poisoning the well". The topic is about promiscuity, its effects on society, and whether it is a neutral or harmful lifestyle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well

Either way, he's Jewish himself and he does bash homosexual promiscuity, because he considers the homosexual lifestyle to be inherently (and statistically) promiscuous whereas heterosexual relationships, even on a bad day, are traditionally less promiscuous. But they are both converging since you kids these days are watching too much MTV and lady gaga or whatever it is you do.

I'd appreciate your words if you also pointed out in the same manner, men having many wives and many sex slaves is also wrong, which is very much like promiscuity.
Doesn't God promise promiscuity for men in the form of many virgins in the afterlife?