I think this stand to reason to answer your question as posted by einstein...
you are born with a certain number of muscle fibers. More fibers are never produced, the ones that are there just get stronger. Your fibers work efficiently as possible, they use as little fibers possible to lift a certain weight. I have no idea if what the algorithm is or if there even is one for the rate at which these fibers can progress. But it makes sense to think that someone who benches 225 for 12 reps is going to require more fibers than a someone who is doing say 135 for 12 reps. Therefore more fibers are being broken down per lift by someone stronger. Does this make sense to everyone?
Regardless of relative strength I would think that the body would recruit less fibers to bench 135 then it would have too to bench 225, therefore more fibers are being broken down, more fibers are being repaired...which you would think would make you bigger...
i just can see a situation where if 2 identical people were to follow everything the same (diet sleep etc) but their training styles....the one who could lift more weight for an equal amount of repetitions would not get bigger faster.....
|
Thread: Show noobs some love
-
03-08-2013, 09:05 AM #31Train for Strength, Eat For Size, Rest for Recovery, Repeat for Results
-
03-08-2013, 09:44 AM #32
-
-
03-08-2013, 12:09 PM #33
-
03-08-2013, 12:12 PM #34
-
03-08-2013, 12:15 PM #35
-
03-08-2013, 12:23 PM #36
good!
well, there was the %x% sticky (now gone) and the sticky that goes over basic routines - they both talk abot doing 5 sets. I will read them again just to make sure.
so a newbie simply does not need to work crazy volume to get results initially. OK. Even if they can ahndle a high volume better not to since it is simply not needed?
Are noobs more prome to over training?
-
-
03-08-2013, 12:28 PM #37Here's my question though (continuing with newbie A and B). Assuming they are both lifting for size (and if that's not the assumption, then this all goes out the window obviously), and both are doing 3x10 with x% of their 1RM. Does the one who is lifting more weight (Newb A) supposedly see more gains than Newb? I'm genuinely curious about this, relative to their strength levels aren't they both doing the same amount of "work" technically? Is there some factor I'm missing out on?
In much the same way, the beginner trainee's CNS is inefficient. It does not "know" how to recruit all the muscle fibers to do the work. I have no idea what % of fibers work in a beginner or an advanced powerlifter, but for the sake of argument say he starts at 30% of fibers recruited to do the work. One month later he has gained very little muscle mass, but his brain has learned to lift and learned to better use the resources (his body) to accomplish the task that has been done repetitively. Now 50% of muscle fibers are recruited and the athlete is much stronger, despite not gaining much size.
I can confidently say that I have more muscle mass than a 59kg powerlifter. Why can they lift way more weight than me? Their CNS can use more fibres more productively than mine can
so a newbie simply does not need to work crazy volume to get results initially. OK. Even if they can ahndle a high volume better not to since it is simply not needed?
Are noobs more prome to over training?
Similar Threads
-
How to lose fat for Noobs - Part II
By wave_length in forum Losing FatReplies: 4422Last Post: 12-12-2018, 10:05 AM -
To everyone with their dream bod, give the noobs some routine advice!!
By Jack3d26 in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 3Last Post: 08-19-2011, 06:29 PM -
How to lose fat for Noobs
By wave_length in forum Losing FatReplies: 10283Last Post: 11-19-2010, 02:02 AM
Bookmarks