Oh lawd
Edit- layne was discussing HIT vs high volume with some random and Dorian jumped in. No specific study was noted.
|
-
02-11-2013, 03:54 PM #1
-
02-11-2013, 03:57 PM #2
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,892
- Rep Power: 1551
Dorian Yates can say what the fuk he wants, if he told me that the best diet consisted entirely of lightbulbs and the dead batteries from used electric toothbrushes I'd probably at least try it for a month
“No citizen has a right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training…what a disgrace it is for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.” - Socrates
-
02-11-2013, 03:58 PM #3
-
02-11-2013, 03:58 PM #4
-
-
02-11-2013, 03:59 PM #5
Lol what a douche. its so hypocritical, the bbers use "science" when its what they want to hear or it goes along with what theyve been taught, but say no to science when its contradictory.
ie- science by hany rambod or kais trainer whatever his name is = science and its ok
science by layne = nope you are wrong dont careInstagram: hyruliangoat_
BEST LOOKING MISCER
CUTEST POSTER OF ALL TIME
PEOPLE ASK FOR MY AUTOGRAPH AND PICTURE EVERYDAY CREW
-
02-11-2013, 03:59 PM #6
-
02-11-2013, 03:59 PM #7
-
02-11-2013, 04:00 PM #8
-
-
02-11-2013, 04:00 PM #9
-
02-11-2013, 04:01 PM #10
-
02-11-2013, 04:01 PM #11
-
02-11-2013, 04:01 PM #12
-
-
02-11-2013, 04:02 PM #13
-
02-11-2013, 04:02 PM #14
-
02-11-2013, 04:02 PM #15
-
02-11-2013, 04:03 PM #16
-
-
02-11-2013, 04:04 PM #17
-
02-11-2013, 04:05 PM #18
-
02-11-2013, 04:05 PM #19
-
02-11-2013, 04:06 PM #20
-
-
02-11-2013, 04:06 PM #21
-
02-11-2013, 04:07 PM #22
-
02-11-2013, 04:07 PM #23
-
02-11-2013, 04:07 PM #24
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,892
- Rep Power: 1551
-
-
02-11-2013, 04:08 PM #25
i love guys who take copious amounts of AAS and GH and slin and then think they can preach diet and physiology and whatever else. And their only reply is: my physique and competition accolades are my basis.
idiots.Psych & handcuffs
Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
House, Techno, and 4Runners
-
02-11-2013, 04:08 PM #26
-
02-11-2013, 04:09 PM #27
-
02-11-2013, 04:09 PM #28
So, if you know this, then you can tell us exactly what the study is and what is wrong with it. Please do so.
experience and studies - they can trump each other in different ways. you need skin in the game, and real experience, and science has to play catchup to a lot of methods discovered by trial and error. but experience builds up a great amount of superstition too - this is a stone cold fact. people confuse causation, they have no way of determining good rules of thumb from bad in a lot of cases - inescapable fact.
If we went back in time with the scientific method to some ancient people, a study showing that goat sacrifices don't work before battle doesn't mean that the experienced warriors are right about it and the academics are wrong. (and of course, the academics can get confused too on different issues and their causations - lecturing birds how to fly comes to mind)
"experience >>> studies" is a decent rule of thumb... it just ain't strictly true.Feathered Nether Regions
-
-
02-11-2013, 04:10 PM #29
-
02-11-2013, 04:11 PM #30
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,030
- Rep Power: 3071
Awful argument
The difference is bodybuilding isn't the front line of war
Lets make the question more pertinent, after all bodybuilding is fundamentally science.
You want to evaluate current evidence in muscle growth, you have somebody who has lifted weights for ten years, is genetically gifted, and uses performing enhancing drugs, or you have a natural pro bodybuilder/power lifter who has a PhD is nutritionbut who was lift
Bookmarks