I am currently 178 lbs. I have heard that less is more with this ingredient so I was thinking of dosing just one a day to start with and then assessing from there. Does that sound good? and if so, would it be more optimal to take it at morning or evening, and empty stomach or with food? Thanks.
|
Thread: Questions on dosing SNS Bulbine
-
02-11-2013, 12:35 PM #1
Questions on dosing SNS Bulbine
-
02-11-2013, 12:39 PM #2
-
02-11-2013, 12:46 PM #3
-
02-11-2013, 12:55 PM #4
-
-
02-11-2013, 01:00 PM #5
-
02-11-2013, 01:05 PM #6
Less is in fact more when it comes to Bulbine dosing, the 100mg/kg dose which showed the decline in T was double the most effective dose (50mg/kg). Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that there is a slope down from the 50mg/kg (inverse-U), so exceeding the dose will likely not result in lowered T until you exceed your recommended dose substantially.
Dosing one day isn't going to give you any response to the efficacy of bulbine, that would be pointless.
For someone your bodyweight, i'd recommend 1 cap per day making the bottle last 60 days. Pretty good eh?Psych & handcuffs
Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
House, Techno, and 4Runners
-
02-11-2013, 01:14 PM #7
-
02-11-2013, 01:15 PM #8
-
-
02-11-2013, 01:18 PM #9
wowowow what a completely predictible response. Sure let's just throw out a novel ingredient because of rat studies.
If you think i'm going to get in to it with you over Bulbine of all things... think again. If you don't like it, fine.
Edit: Last i checked this is the only human study on prolensis:
http://www.jissn.com/content/9/S1/P33Last edited by rhadam; 02-11-2013 at 01:24 PM.
Psych & handcuffs
Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
House, Techno, and 4Runners
-
02-11-2013, 01:20 PM #10
Thanks for the response. I didn't actually mean that I would try a dose and then see if anything happens, I just meant that I would start at 1 cap a day and then ramp up to 2 a day from there if need be. But per your suggestion I will keep it at 1 cap a day. Do you have any recommendation on whether to take it with food or not, and as to what time of day would be optimal?
-
02-11-2013, 01:37 PM #11
You're the one selling the novel ingredient.
You're the one who should be demonstrating that it works.
Not saying 'pay us and then figure out if it works for yourself, and if it doesn't, it's just not for you thanks for the money'
Your owner can post a $1m bond but not spend what, a couple hundred bucks each on a few dozen testers to even get a rudimentary idea of whether the product works or is dosed anywhere near correctly?
How can you say less is more authoritatively, when nobody even knows if the ingredient works at all in humans, or what the ideal dose should be, since virtually no test boosting ingredients scale properly with normal HED conventions?
-
02-11-2013, 02:09 PM #12
Depends on your definition of the word "selling." I'm here to answer questions (to the best of my ability) and to give advice when necessary. I'm not here to shill and pimp stuff that is bunk (see: synephrine, arginine, CEE, HMB blah blah blah the list goes on).
I cannot demonstrate it works outside of the rat model. Otherwise we have a plethora of human anecdotal reports firmly backing the efficacy of Natalensis. There are also companies that have done in-house testing to back up the dosage methods and effects, but that data will not be released.
Saying no one even knows if the ingredient works in humans is so far from the truth it's laughable. There may not be a concretized dosing scale for Natalensis in humans, but with the research done we have a pretty good view of it's effects when dosing per the bell curve.Psych & handcuffs
Current reading: Vonnegut, Theodor Adorno
House, Techno, and 4Runners
-
-
02-11-2013, 02:37 PM #13
-
02-11-2013, 02:59 PM #14
Bookmarks