I know its not perfect but if you guys would rank it what would you put it at? I'm going for a runners build. I am starting a new thread as more as a rank one. I took a new pic and this ones probably better then my last topic because that I felt wasn't really all that great. It's my front side. I was 5'11 150 lbs and then I use to be 210 lbs at heaviest. I'm trying to build some muscle and have the stature of a runner. Am I almost there? Here's the pic.
|
|
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
02-06-2013, 01:57 PM #1
Rank my body from a scale of 1/10? A actual flex photo instead of a natural pic.
Last edited by Jw29pa; 02-06-2013 at 02:14 PM.
-
02-06-2013, 03:32 PM #2Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: State / Province, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 43
- Posts: 63
- Rep Power: 144
Im sure this is about the third thread you have started asking pretty much the same question. Starting a new thread is not going to make you get the answers you want to hear!!
Runners body = so varied! Olympic distance runners have low body fat but little muscle size. Some look anoerexic. Not a good look in my opinion. Only good if you are serious about your distance running. Where as a sprinter has alot more muscle and IMO look much better.
You need to add muscle, by eating and lifting heavy.
-
02-06-2013, 04:04 PM #3Squat til you Puke
- Join Date: Nov 2010
- Location: Warner Robins, Georgia, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 3,443
- Rep Power: 5676
you look terrible. it seems like you dont workout and spend your time on video games and the internet while chugging down mountain dew and cheesy poofs. spend a year in the gym and try again
-
02-06-2013, 04:10 PM #4Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 25
- Rep Power: 0
Not worried bout numbers I really could give a fuak, go shave and spend some time outside mowning the lawn. Then go to the gym
Bookmarks