Put world #3 Dennis Wolf's delts on Arnold and his chest would look much smaller, World #3 Dennis Wolf has a lot of mass in his bi's they just don't peak as well as Arnolds.
I will take ('Spud')that as a compliment, Dexter is the 'blade', Arnold was the 'Oak', Bertyl was 'Brutal', Heath is'the gift'. Thankyou FlangmasterJ.
|
-
02-05-2013, 12:29 AM #211TEAM WOLF + TEAM KAI +TEAM CEDRIC + TEAM ROMGLE - TEAM RAMY - TEAM FAIR JUDGING
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
20 Years of bodybuilding knowledge, it does n't come easy 'FullROM 2012'
Always train with a FullROM - Do not brag about how much weight you can lift if you do not use a FullROM - 'FullROM 2012'
TEAM LEVRONE
-
02-05-2013, 01:28 AM #212
-
-
02-05-2013, 02:00 AM #213
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 50
- Posts: 78
- Rep Power: 207
-
02-05-2013, 02:13 AM #214
-
02-05-2013, 02:22 AM #215
-
02-05-2013, 09:55 AM #216
-
-
02-05-2013, 10:42 AM #217
-
02-05-2013, 11:33 AM #218
-
02-05-2013, 11:36 AM #219
-
02-05-2013, 11:56 AM #220
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Age: 40
- Posts: 2,272
- Rep Power: 0
Arnolds physique would be better than Wolf? If WOlf had better calves this wouldnt even be a comparison. Wolf has a ridculous waist, is wide as the greatest of the width monsters., has very strong legs. HAs a very good x frame. Just lacks bicep peak. How would Arnold be better than Wolf. Are more ppl trolling. Whats going on in here??
-
-
02-05-2013, 12:03 PM #221
-
02-05-2013, 12:44 PM #222
Listen, you need to start articulating properly.
The greatest of the width monsters clearly doesn't count for much, seeing as it doesn't really give him a noticeable advantage on stage. He and Arnie are roughly the same height and he's got Arnold by 20-25lbs.
Arnold's weak points - quads, shoulders. Wolf's weak points - calves, BDB, biceps, hamstrings.
There's no way our good friend Wolf would walk over Arnold.People these days have more reps than brain cells
-
02-05-2013, 05:06 PM #223
Arnold weak points (by that era standards).......perhaps.
Let's be serious, his legs would not even be close to Wolf's (calves....yes, lol). Pose for pose Wolf is just a lot bigger, wider, more conditioned, etc. I think some of you are forgetting that even though it is "Arnold," his physique would not place today. You really cannot "guestimate" what it "would" look like but I highly doubt it would be what some of you are picturing.
-
02-05-2013, 05:21 PM #224
How would Arnold be better than Wolf? Hmmm, who's really trolling in here...
WOLF:
ARNOLD:
Now the debate is, what would Arnold look like with TODAY's advances. In all the different pictures I've seen of both Arnold and Wolf, the only reason Wolf would beat Arnold is size. BUT, given that Arnold's shape is much, much superior and the potential extra mass he could have added given today's tools and methods he would absolutely dominate Wolf. I know certain people are going to vehemently disagree, but the only thing Wolf might have on Arnold given these hypothetical circumstances is quad size/sweep (but, IMO Wolf's quads look horrible, but that's just a personal preference), waist size and shoulder width. All of which mean jack when you have flat looking arms, no calves, super high lats and a good but not epic chest and your standing next to a man who has some of the peakiest biceps ever, super low inserting lats, good calves and a massive barrel chest. Arnold is just put together better than Wolf, no doubt about it at all.Last edited by aussieryan; 02-05-2013 at 06:02 PM. Reason: spelling
-
-
02-05-2013, 05:26 PM #225
ARNOLD:
Now the debate is, what would Arnold look like with TODAY's advances. In all the different pictures I've seen of both Arnold and Wolf, the only reason Wolf would beat Arnold is size. BUT, given that Arnold's shape is much, much superior and the potential extra mass he could have added given today's tools and methods he would absolutely dominate Wold. I know certain people are going to vehemently disagree, but the only thing Wolf might have on Arnold given these hypothetical circumstances is quad size/sweep (but, IMO Wold's quads look horrible, but that's just a personal preference), waist size and shoulder width. All of which mean jack when you have flat looking arms, no calves, super high lats and a good but not epic chest and your standing next to a man who has some of the peakiest biceps ever, super low inserting lats, good calves and a massive barrel chest. Arnold is just put together better than Wolf, no doubt about it at all.[/QUOTE]
Sergio is winning this pose. The guy was unreal!
-
02-05-2013, 05:50 PM #226
-
02-05-2013, 06:01 PM #227
-
02-05-2013, 06:04 PM #228
-
-
02-05-2013, 06:10 PM #229
-
02-05-2013, 06:22 PM #230
You just proved the power of Illusion.
Sergios arms are actually equal to arnolds arms in this picture. Sergios calves, quads, chest and lats are also bigger in that pose. The biggest difference between the two? Height and Waist Size.
I will gladly photoshop this for you if you want but if you give Sergios waist size to arnold (and vise versa) the effects will be dramatic
P.S. WTF is going on with this thread and the posts people are making? We need to either do one of the following:
1. Stop being dumb by stating definitive facts
OR
2. Realize the best Ronnie Coleman would still beat the best Arnold on stageLast edited by KoncreteKyle; 02-05-2013 at 06:32 PM.
IFBB Pro Graphic Design Photoshop Ninja
Most people talk a lot, few are up for the moment.
-
02-05-2013, 06:24 PM #231
-
02-05-2013, 06:27 PM #232
-
-
02-05-2013, 06:30 PM #233
LOL damnit ... Okay, I'm waking up at 5am MST (9hours 30mins from now) to finish some graphics for a couple companies. To warm up, I will make this chop. You better be ready!
Yes, exactly my point .. wait,are we on the same page here? ... Did we just become friends? LOLIFBB Pro Graphic Design Photoshop Ninja
Most people talk a lot, few are up for the moment.
-
02-05-2013, 06:31 PM #234
-
02-05-2013, 06:31 PM #235
You have to keep in mind that Arnold became what he became because of what was what back then (duh..?), so if he was upcoming in this era, his training methods, philosophy, inspiration and all these other factors would have influenced his physique, he wouldn't even look like a bigger 70s Arnold. There's too much to count in.
Last edited by RoroCwalker; 02-05-2013 at 06:37 PM.
-
02-05-2013, 06:39 PM #236
This is very true. On page 2 (I think) I made some mathematical calculations that I felt accurately portrayed arnolds ascension into the current times. If I have time, I will create this photoshop rendition as well.
........ I should have just stayed out of this thread hahaIFBB Pro Graphic Design Photoshop Ninja
Most people talk a lot, few are up for the moment.
-
-
02-05-2013, 06:57 PM #237
I think we can all agree, bodybuilders today look considerably different compared to that of the 70s but are there people here on the forum who legitimately think that the genetic pool of even the most elite guys has changed so much for the 'larger' that on stage weights and appearances are that much different? A difference of 40 years making this much of a visual difference, genetically? Come on now...
**If any information in my posts helps you, take a moment to let me know somehow**
The above information is not medical advice nor intended to be used in place of it
Exercise Physiology BS/MS, CSCS, Injury Rehabilitation Specialist
Realistic before being realistic was the in thing.
◆◆MrCompulsiveX chases his dreams◆◆ A log of chasing the most valuable commodity
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=155576083&page=1
-
02-05-2013, 10:02 PM #238
-
02-06-2013, 01:02 AM #239
-
02-06-2013, 01:51 AM #240
Similar Threads
-
Arnold Bulked?????????
By Steinman in forum Professional BodybuildingReplies: 18Last Post: 02-19-2004, 08:12 AM
Bookmarks