he would look like gunter witha smaller wiast and bigger arms traps and back. Arnold is the ultimate alpha he would do what ever it would take to beat the other guys, luckily he was blessed with sick genetics.
|
-
02-03-2013, 11:51 PM #151
-
02-04-2013, 12:49 AM #152
-
-
02-04-2013, 03:24 AM #153
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Age: 40
- Posts: 2,272
- Rep Power: 0
i have no idea what u on abt. Is that pic from Olympia 92 and you implying with your pic that he looks great in it, and that at Olympia 93, his structure couldnt possibly change in 1 year from 92 to 93?
Yes, his structure couldnt change in that period, but did you watch the 93 olympia. He looked dreadful, and you trying to prove a point by posting a pic like that is moronic.
-
02-04-2013, 03:30 AM #154
-
02-04-2013, 04:03 AM #155
-
02-04-2013, 04:12 AM #156
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Age: 40
- Posts: 2,272
- Rep Power: 0
well , you havent seen the vid, so really just keep quiet. if you think that physique was worthy of 10th place then you my friend are a pure moron. And you Raz, pointing out the fact that drugs have advanced. Has anyone disputed that point? Why did you type that, you trying to get someone to call you names? You dangerously close to that point,
-
-
02-04-2013, 04:42 AM #157
-
02-04-2013, 04:55 AM #158
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Age: 40
- Posts: 2,272
- Rep Power: 0
Marsh, Mcneil, Marrazzo(who placed 6th at the AC that year), ....you phuckin moron...trust me on this. Also, im pretty sure Labrada got told to retire, as Weider had his next crop of Weider superstars contracted. Its so obvious, but you an idiot, so you will probably point out that its all just conspiracy bullchit on my part.
-
02-04-2013, 05:04 AM #159
-
02-04-2013, 05:11 AM #160
-
-
02-04-2013, 05:17 AM #161
I'm thinking an almost gunter like physique too, maybe even slightly rhul like in chest and torso.
In 74' Arnold was beastly so add to that certain protocols that became popular in the 90's you could add maybe another 30lb's or so could be looking at a 260lb+ Arnold?
Then add to that certain methods that would bring up his shoulders and tri's.
-
02-04-2013, 05:34 AM #162
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Age: 40
- Posts: 2,272
- Rep Power: 0
So you went to go have a look, thats a start. Maybe you American and hold Lou dear to your heart. Anyone else outside of AMerica dont really hold him in high regard. he was in the Hulk and that was it. there is no way that his imbalanced physique should have placed better than those mentioned. there are other names aswell i didnt care to mention. @ Raz, ofcourse its nonsense to you, it doesnt make sense to you because you dumb.
-
02-04-2013, 05:51 AM #163
-
02-04-2013, 05:57 AM #164
-
-
02-04-2013, 06:01 AM #165
-
02-04-2013, 06:13 AM #166
-
02-04-2013, 06:17 AM #167
-
02-04-2013, 06:30 AM #168
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Location: Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- Age: 40
- Posts: 2,272
- Rep Power: 0
You think Arnolds genetics(bodytype) is comparable to Levrone who at age 26, was already a NPC champion( mixed race mutant Black/italian), comparable to Yates who took jsut 4 years to become a UK champion and Olympia Champion at 28, Ray, at 19/20 already a NPC champ, Dillet at 19 already 21inch arms, 21 inch calves, 30 inch things, , Flex....nuff said....yes, they are mutants. Elite elite genetics. If you think Arnie whos slumpy shoudlers, long legs, average waist, can compare then you really are an idiot of the highest order. OH WAIT, you do think this.Guess you are one. STop posting, and remove yourself from this thread. Mind you, they faced serious competition, not getting into it again at how many more bodybuilders there were after the 70s.
-
-
02-04-2013, 06:32 AM #169
-
02-04-2013, 06:37 AM #170
-
02-04-2013, 06:57 AM #171
Well, Lou had a seriously crappy midsection in 1993, but he was indeed bigger than everybody else on stage. I don't get why you guys are so obsessed with '93 though, why doesn't 1992 count as an example of how Lou "would have looked like in the 90s"? Point is, in the end, that he was considerably bigger and a top class competitor with today's advantages when compared to the 70's. Why shouldn't that be the case with someone who was already better than Lou in the 70s?
Sports Therapy- & Prevention Major - University of Potsdam
Exercise Biology Major - University of California, Davis
Certified Strength and Conditioning Coach
Nutritional Consultant
-
02-04-2013, 07:45 AM #172
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 50
- Posts: 78
- Rep Power: 207
I am going to throw it out that had not Lou retired after 75 to pursue TV and Movies, he would have likely been the contender to replace Arnold to win 76-79 and onward. Take his definition from 74 and mass from 75, add some dedicated training (I don't count the hurry up he did for 75 and pumping iron) and it is my opinion that Lou would have won the Olympia. I mean seriously, who was left in the tall class?
Arnold and Lou retiring was the best thing ever for Frank Zane.
Ken Waller? Winner of tall class, lost to Franco? 76 Franco looked great, but a equal tall man beats an equal short man
Mike Katz? Awesome guy, but too many weaknesses.
Serge Nubret? Another contender but he kinda dropped off the scene
Robby Robinson? Uncrowned Mr. Olympia
Bill Grant? No calves
Denis Tinerino? Kinda showing his age, been battling with Arnold since the late 60s.
-
-
02-04-2013, 07:56 AM #173
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 50
- Posts: 78
- Rep Power: 207
Just face the simple fact that Arnold had probably the best balance and symmetry of any bodybuilder that ever competed in the 60s through the 80s. So let's add 10-20 pounds to his frame. Arnold would add it proportionately all over his body and he would not of ballooned up his stomach with GH and insulin and whatever else became fashionable in the late 80s onward. At some point he would have stopped adding mass because he was all about sym and proportions.
-
02-04-2013, 08:46 AM #174
-
02-04-2013, 09:00 AM #175
No, he was not all about symmetry and proportions. Actually, what made him stand out against his competition was his size. He did not have better proportions than many from that time, namely zane. Symmetry was a given in those days, most were very symmetric...arnold definetly didn't stood out in that department.
Arnold was a winner above all. If he wanted to win in say colemans prime era, he would have to add a lot of size. With significant size at that point comes significant waist growth. His waist was not good to begin with, and it would only get worst.
-
02-04-2013, 09:05 AM #176
Question, with people like Coleman and Cutler, and their respective success on the stage, why do people give that many damns about waist size?
What i'm trying to say is Arnold's bad from the knee up to the hips only. With added mass in that area the dude would rock, regardless of waist.People these days have more reps than brain cells
-
-
02-04-2013, 09:23 AM #177
I was just saying that his waist would get worst with added size, and if arnold wanted to be competitive, considering how is waist size was not genetically good (like with coleman for example) it would "ballon up" like with everybody that we have seen that tried to reach the kind of thickness that coleman presented in 03 forward. Im not saying that would be a major problem (it could), im just saying it would happen
-
02-04-2013, 09:30 AM #178
-
02-04-2013, 09:32 AM #179
I see. Well i think he'd do better than most with a big gut, seeing how well he controlled his already not-so-modest waist.
Oh lawd you're such a ****tard mate. Quit bitching about the certain top 10 and realize they weren't the only ones bodybuilding.People these days have more reps than brain cells
-
02-04-2013, 09:36 AM #180
Similar Threads
-
Arnold Bulked?????????
By Steinman in forum Professional BodybuildingReplies: 18Last Post: 02-19-2004, 08:12 AM
Bookmarks