Ronnie Coleman 1999 VS Ronnie Coleman 2000

[auraldr]

[Iceman1981]

1999 is better to me.

[Daewoo_Lanos]

1999 ronnie is the best physique of all time

[Cobbaa]

Ronnie looks absolutely insane in these videos. So much muscle. I'm starting to think he was actually from another planet.

hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggggggggggggggggggggggg g

[Tb0282]

1999 was his best imo

[rgabrielle1986]

His muscularity is mind blowing.. Glutes and chest are the best. However.. In video it's impossible not to notice how just completely blow out and bloated is midsection truly is. He looks like he has a big bloated beer belly but at 4percent body fat.. So weird and unfortunate

[nonamewut]

insane muscularity

[Jaixs]

His muscularity is mind blowing.. Glutes and chest are the best. However.. In video it's impossible not to notice how just completely blow out and bloated is midsection truly is. He looks like he has a big bloated beer belly but at 4percent body fat.. So weird and unfortunate

Wow, you really have no clue... Dont worry son, you'll get there!

[RoroCwalker]

99

[Esthetique]

1998 GP is my fav

[rgabrielle1986]

Wow, you really have no clue... Dont worry son, you'll get there!

You disagree with my opinion so I have no clue. Whatever bro. The buys stomach is huge and he is unable to hide it in the video. In pictures he can control it an minimize the problem.. But in video you can see his big belly hanging out there

[Jaixs]

You disagree with my opinion so I have no clue. Whatever bro. The buys stomach is huge and he is unable to hide it in the video. In pictures he can control it an minimize the problem.. But in video you can see his big belly hanging out there

Nah, I meant in general. His chest is not his best, his mid section does not look like a "beer belly", and he is lower beyond 4% bf.

[stan_dias]

He absolutely destroyed any challengers In his prime! That fullness and shape!!!

[FAN0FdaSport]

99 is my fav, but he also looked insane in every sense of the word at the 2000 british grand prix

[flangmasterj]

Do you guys think he may have been a little too muscular at some of those shows?

[handyman89]

Do you guys think he may have been a little too muscular at some of those shows?

whats crazy is how damn muscular he was but his symetry was damn near perfect!

[mikieson]

guess im the only person that doesnt see that much difference in 99 and 2000?

[purdey]

Do you guys think he may have been a little too muscular at some of those shows?

I wouldn't say too "muscular" but i would say he sacrificed aesthetics (its a legit BBing term not matter how much people hate it) and proportions to take his mass to another level

[purdey]

guess im the only person that doesnt see that much difference in 99 and 2000?

probably because the videos are stretched, Its hard to see much difference

[Jag15]

mind is blown at 1999 video how is that even possible

[purdey]

1998 GP is my fav

Yeah, this to me is where he had the right combo of mass and proportions

[BartPimpson]

I maybe like 1999 more but really it's too close.

[trulyhuge1]

All of his years were rediculous. I personally have loved his 2000 look. To me, he really started showing his dominance and the fact that unless he is injured he will win and win for a long time. Some of the poses at the 200 Mr. O were rediculous. His back just blew everyone away. Again, 1999 was awesome and I see why some like that, but I prefer 2000. 2003 was the most dominant physique we have seen and will see for years to come.

[Merauder]

shiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeetttttttt

[Ghetto Boy]

arnold classic 2001 for me

[flangmasterj]

I wouldn't say too "muscular" but i would say he sacrificed aesthetics (its a legit BBing term not matter how much people hate it) and proportions to take his mass to another level

Dammit too subtle again.

[planes12]

he seemed to pop more in 99 but 00 was insane as well.

[Esthetique]

Yeah, this to me is where he had the right combo of mass and proportions

Yeah, even his midsection was tight as phuck. Look at those arms. Looks like 25 legit inches

[purdey]

Dammit too subtle again.

Waaaaay to subtle bro haha

[ks12]

Nah, I meant in general. His chest is not his best, his mid section does not look like a "beer belly", and he is lower beyond 4% bf.

Do you mean he is under 4% bodyfat?? Because if so, you cant get much under 4% before you... well... die. I believe male visceral fat is 3% so that is the lowest you can go.