10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax

[-Lucifer]

they left a reflector on the moon that you can SEE with amateur telescopes today, how do you explain that away?

Scientists still use this mirror to give them laser accurate measurements of the moons distance from earth

/thread

[PieceAMind]

what are those 2 lights on the left of picture 9 ? Camera reflection?

[TommyTuffGuy]

You just have to approach it like this: Had this been hoaxed, Russia would have been up our collective asses for the past 40 years letting the world know this had transpired.

[DiaMedic]

seriously.... watch mythbusters on this one... they totally rock all of the theories that point towards us making up the lunar landing.

no stars? can you see stars outside when it's daylight? no? well its the same on the moon too...

big blast crater? the moon is mostly made out of rock.. it has massive craters now because there's no atmosphere to slow down any meteorites that strike the surface, so they get a full blow at the moon, not like on earth where the majority of them burn up before even getting miles to the surface of us.

[iPhoneSRQ]

there's no fuking way we went to the moon...besides all of those things in op's post

my iphone has more technology than was available in the 1960's

other countries laugh at the US cause they know it was a hoax

we didn't go
/thread

[basement iron]

10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax - ThatHustle.com

All of that junk has been refuted a million times...ad nauseum.

And also, a layman's understanding of physics alone is enough to discredit 4 of them. Just stop parroting this junk. YOU are the one being hoodwinked, not the public.

Science illiteracy at its finest.

[Kabanstva]

My take on it is....

So many decades have passed since they claimed they landed on the moon. Technology has advanced so much since then. Why the phuck have there not been more attempts at going to the moon?

Surely if they had the technology back in the 60's, they should be make daily trips there now.

I just call BS on it all the way around. Wtf is stopping them from doing it again today?

[thedoggod]

I used to think this was all conspiracy tinfoil hat sheit.


But then my dad bought some pictures of the moon landing(reprints) and I asked the same thing, the waving flag, and the different light angles. Looking into it.. I don't know what I think anymore.. srs.

[Kabanstva]

there's no fuking way we went to the moon...besides all of those things in op's post

my iphone has more technology than was available in the 1960's

other countries laugh at the US cause they know it was a hoax

we didn't go
/thread

Exactly my phucking point. An iphone has more technology than all the technology that was available in the 60's COMBINED.
If we have advanced so much, going to the moon right now should be a walk in the park. Yet, nobody is going there today. Why? Because it never phucking happened.

[blkbelt42]

My take on it is....

So many decades have passed since they claimed they landed on the moon. Technology has advanced so much since then. Why the phuck have there not been more attempts at going to the moon?

Surely if they had the technology back in the 60's, they should be make daily trips there now.

I just call BS on it all the way around. Wtf is stopping them from doing it again today?

for what purpose would we go now?

[PieceAMind]

My take on it is....

So many decades have passed since they claimed they landed on the moon. Technology has advanced so much since then. Why the phuck have there not been more attempts at going to the moon?

Surely if they had the technology back in the 60's, they should be make daily trips there now.

I just call BS on it all the way around. Wtf is stopping them from doing it again today?

Cost and reason to

[whatisbro]

im pretty sure goku left that mirror on the moon
damn sheep

[basement iron]

my iphone has more technology than was available in the 1960's
/thread

If/then fallacy.

If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's then we never went to the moon.
If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's then cars from the 60's can't drive across country.
If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's than no ship in the 60's can sail across the ocean.

Brilliant logic.

[Kabanstva]

for what purpose would we go now?

To phucking prove that it's possible? There's a start.

Cost and reason to

Lol, that's a BS excuse that is often used by people with no common sense. We waste billions of dollars on the dumbest ****, yet you say cost is the reason we're not doing it right now. That's hilarious.

[bezarker]

[basement iron]

Why the phuck have there not been more attempts at going to the moon?

Geopolitical.

[Djfranktank]

not this again

[wheelz_of_steel]

Listen to this whole thing, and Teller humiliates Joe Rogan over this issue, who continues to grasp at straws. Don't be a moron.

[whatisbro]

If/then fallacy.

If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's then we never went to the moon.
If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's then cars from the 60's can't drive across country.
If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's than no ship in the 60's can sail across the ocean.

Brilliant logic.

but ifonez dont yooze enjins

[Kabanstva]

Geopolitical.

So you're saying you don't have a clue?

[trankwil]

both sides have been disproven, we neither went nor didn't go

[iPhoneSRQ]

If/then fallacy.

If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's then we never went to the moon.
If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's then cars from the 60's can't drive across country.
If your phone has more technology than was available in the 1960's than no ship in the 60's can sail across the ocean.

Brilliant logic.

you dumb fuk

cause driving and sailing require nearly the same technology as flying a fuking space shuttle to the moon
gtfo *******

[doughnutking]

Buzz Aldrin would disagree with you op, and then knock you the fuc out.



Don't ever disrespect the Buzz again *******.

[1800_Cool_Guy]

Isn't China planning a trip to the moon on 2017? I think I read they want to go to the moon and will also examine if there was an actual moon landing before while they are there.

[Bobalobski]

[ButchDeadlifter]

NASA sent astronauts to the moon, the astronauts were just ****ty photographers and they needed to create some better shots for the media/history books

[acr70]

Why did I read all of that.

[KReyn]

I watched a documentary on this a few years back, it was pretty good. I think it was called The Greatest Lie Ever Told or something along those lines.

[Cronoh]

its pretty simple why we haven't returned to the moon, there is nothing there worth the money right now, it was a costly expedition that was nothing more than a pissing contest. It was a great tool for media and inspirational reasons. You really think we have the mars rover, hundred of satellites orbiting earth, manned space station, satellites orbiting other planets, and we "CANT" land on the moon?

[PatTheBaker]

To phucking prove that it's possible? There's a start.



Lol, that's a BS excuse that is often used by people with no common sense. We waste billions of dollars on the dumbest ****, yet you say cost is the reason we're not doing it right now. That's hilarious.

We did that. In 1969.