|
-
12-26-2012, 01:11 AM #1
-
12-26-2012, 01:17 AM #2
-
12-26-2012, 01:37 AM #3
-
12-26-2012, 01:45 AM #4
-
-
12-26-2012, 01:53 AM #5
-
12-26-2012, 01:54 AM #6
-
12-26-2012, 02:03 AM #7
-
12-26-2012, 02:05 AM #8
-
-
12-26-2012, 02:51 AM #9
-
12-26-2012, 06:23 AM #10
I'm a huge fan of old school bodybuilding.
It was more unique IMO cause a lot of competitors had imbalances that made them stand out compared to other bodybuilders, while today, most people are perfectly symmetrical, which is a good thing, but it's less unique and the posing is less artistic.~Jesus Christ Is My Savior Crew~
The land at the end of our toes goes on and on,
The sand at the core of our bones continues on
Hey I just met you. And this is crazy. But today is chest day. So spot me maybe?
Art thou prone to such insurmountable force upon thou biceps?
-
12-26-2012, 06:25 AM #11
-
12-26-2012, 06:27 AM #12
-
-
12-26-2012, 06:40 AM #13
Pretty much when the v taper became a u taper, bbing died to me, although some people can make that work well
~Jesus Christ Is My Savior Crew~
The land at the end of our toes goes on and on,
The sand at the core of our bones continues on
Hey I just met you. And this is crazy. But today is chest day. So spot me maybe?
Art thou prone to such insurmountable force upon thou biceps?
-
12-26-2012, 12:16 PM #14
-
12-26-2012, 01:23 PM #15
I liked how physiques had an element of uniqueness before 2000.
Nowadays they all look pretty similar, of course with some accented areas from genetic potential but nothing that sets them apart like the old days.
Maybe it's a personality/charisma thing, or the physiques themselves... who knows.*Advanced 5/3/1 lifts, aiming for Elite*
-
12-26-2012, 02:25 PM #16
-
-
12-26-2012, 02:39 PM #17
-
12-26-2012, 02:43 PM #18
-
12-26-2012, 02:58 PM #19
Completely agree. I think its because bodybuilders were more asymmetrical back in the old school days. Like Arnold had no delts and an overdeveloped chest, Tom Platz and his huge legs etc..
I think 90's were the last good days of bbing. Once Ronnie took over, imo, it started to go downhill. Thats when the U tapor started to be seen more frequently on competitors
Arnold's Rear double bi sucked. He never was able to make his lats pop, same with Levrone. Not a fair comparison IMO
Pretty bad examples to compare imo, but I do agree, the front double bi looks ugly these days~Jesus Christ Is My Savior Crew~
The land at the end of our toes goes on and on,
The sand at the core of our bones continues on
Hey I just met you. And this is crazy. But today is chest day. So spot me maybe?
Art thou prone to such insurmountable force upon thou biceps?
-
12-27-2012, 07:47 PM #20
Bump for some old school love
~Jesus Christ Is My Savior Crew~
The land at the end of our toes goes on and on,
The sand at the core of our bones continues on
Hey I just met you. And this is crazy. But today is chest day. So spot me maybe?
Art thou prone to such insurmountable force upon thou biceps?
-
-
12-27-2012, 11:42 PM #21
-
12-28-2012, 12:02 AM #22
-
12-28-2012, 12:28 AM #23
For myself I like the look of fitness models more which are more attainable for myself -http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=139110343- lot of pics in their of what I mean
Yet that pic is a little unfair anyways plenty of pros have a tight waist.
Colemans waist was tight for most of his career anyways until later when he started to deteriorate. I think the pros now look sick and have improved though in terms of bodybuilding perspective all around. They are bigger and leaner in most cases plus they actually have legs.
-
12-28-2012, 01:55 AM #24
-
-
12-28-2012, 06:07 AM #25
-
12-28-2012, 06:14 AM #26
-
12-28-2012, 06:15 AM #27
-
12-28-2012, 08:41 AM #28
-
-
12-28-2012, 08:47 AM #29
-
12-28-2012, 08:56 AM #30
Similar Threads
-
@Big Fuzzy
By MZ990 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 155Last Post: 01-20-2008, 07:48 AM
Bookmarks