I wanted to work on getting ripped and building mega size strength this winter. I was going to use a lean mass gains and gain strength lifting programs.
But I don't know which rep type program to use with that program.
Which One Has Worked Best For You: Drop Sets, Super Sets, or negative sets for building strength and getting ripped?
|
-
11-24-2012, 10:53 AM #1
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 1,243
- Rep Power: 0
Drop Sets, Super Sets, or Negative sets for building strength and getting ripped?
Keep stackin on the plates, my muscles are hungry for more!
-
11-24-2012, 11:50 AM #2
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Location: Omaha, Nebraska, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 1,384
- Rep Power: 504
For strength gains I would use none of the above!
Look at most any proven strength routine and they all have the same thing in common: multiple sets with low reps and adiquite rest periods.
Super sets and drop sets are generally used as a method to increase volume/training density, with primary goal being hypertrophy. Negatives, I think you'll find more people against them then for them
-
11-24-2012, 01:15 PM #3
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 35
- Posts: 119
- Rep Power: 162
Agree with above. To get ripped, you'd need to lower body fat as well. I like a dropset of EZ bar curls at the end of chest and bicep workout, and superset db bench and flies when I'm pushed for time.
"The difference between impossible and possible, is the strength of ones determination"
"Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could only do a little"
-
11-24-2012, 01:36 PM #4
You're all over the place here. You need to define your goal, and then devise a plan to get there.
Which One Has Worked Best For You: Drop Sets, Super Sets, or negative sets for building strength and getting ripped?No brain, no gain.
"The fitness and nutrition world is a breeding ground for obsessive-compulsive behavior. The irony is that many of the things people worry about have no impact on results either way, and therefore aren't worth an ounce of concern."--Alan Aragon
Where the mind goes, the body follows.
Ironwill Gym:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=629719403&postcount=3388
Ironwill2008 Journal:
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=157459343&p=1145168733
-
-
11-24-2012, 05:55 PM #5
OP you're talking about two different things here.. getting big and getting shredded. Both can't be achieved very well at all at the same time. Choose one or the other. Bulk first then cut.
As far as all the different techniques you listed.. those are all just different ways of hitting the muscles and shocking them differently. If size is the goal, make sure you're in a caloric surplus and are progressing week after week either in reps or weight and it will equal profit. Bulk until you feel fat and cut.
-
12-21-2012, 01:31 PM #6
-
12-21-2012, 02:20 PM #7
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 1,243
- Rep Power: 0
-
12-21-2012, 06:51 PM #8
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: Hollywood, Florida, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 202
- Rep Power: 0
Drop sets, super sets, and negatives... are all more important for muscle size than for strength.
Dropsets and supersets are particularly useless for strength. Strengthwise it is most effective to fully recover between sets and go heavy as hell.
But like I said all 3 are useful for building size. And "getting ripped" falls under the category of gaining size bevause it is muscle size in comparison to "fat size" that is concealing it.
what I'm saying is your title is misleading.... Frequently the best thing for getting ripped and getting strong are 2 different things.
Bookmarks