-
5x5 errday
Originally Posted by germaine07
You're comparing alcohol to guns when you should really be comparing the car to guns. The car is the tool which was used to kill in the incident just like the gun is the weapon to kill. The difference is, cars were designed for transportation and guns were designed to kill. Also, drunk drivers don't intentionally kill people, whereas when people shoot other people, the intention is to kill as that is what the weapon was designed for.
It takes a person with morals to operate both a firearm and car in a safe manner, guns do not shoot themselves as car do not run people over.I'm not bashing drinking, and I love to spend the night getting tanked,which is why I walk to and from the bar. Getting behind the wheel drunk and driving,then killing someone is basically negligent murder,whatever your intentions were.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." – Thomas Jefferson
Ron Paul 16' R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution
NY Rangers-Jets-Mets
***Viking Crew***
-
Registered User
Originally Posted by zakatak333
the gun itself has no intention. it can be used as a weapon, much like anything else
The gun, was designed as a weapon of war, with the purpose of killing people. yes it's function is the fire a projectile, but it was designed to do so with the intention to cause death. It is in no way comparable to a car, which was designed as a form of transportation.
Originally Posted by VlKlNG
It takes a person with morals to operate both a firearm and car in a safe manner, guns do not shoot themselves as car do not run people over.I'm not bashing drinking, and I love to spend the night getting tanked,which is why I walk to and from the bar. Getting behind the wheel drunk and driving,then killing someone is basically negligent murder,whatever your intentions were.
Again, the car is the comparison to the gun, not alcohol. A tool designed for transportation vs a tool designed to kill people.
And how do you operate a firearm in a safe manner? By not using it at all.... (with exception of perhaps hunting or shooting ranges)
Germaine's Training/Nutrition Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=147952853
You don't always get what you wish for,
You get what you work for.
Bite off more than you can chew,
Then Chew it!
-
Not actually named untz.
Originally Posted by likeawashboard
Can you explain what you mean by this? Isn't society the exact opposite - most people don't think for themselves and are hardly considered 'individualised'. Perhaps we need a more individualised society, but I think you're talking about the "everybody for themselves" mindset?
Yes, the "everybody for themselves" mindset.
Man tries to make for himself in the fashion that suits him best a simplified picture of the world; he then tries to substitute this cosmos of his for the world of experience, thus to overcome it. This is what the painter, the poet, the philosopher, and the scientist do, each in his own fashion. Each makes this cosmos and its construction the pivot of his emotional life, in order to find in this way the peace and security which he cannot find in the narrow whirlpool of personal experience.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
Bookmarks