|
-
11-30-2012, 06:50 AM #121
-
11-30-2012, 06:53 AM #122
-
11-30-2012, 06:57 AM #123
-
11-30-2012, 07:00 AM #124
-
-
11-30-2012, 07:00 AM #125
-
11-30-2012, 07:02 AM #126
-
11-30-2012, 07:05 AM #127
-
11-30-2012, 07:05 AM #128
-
-
11-30-2012, 07:08 AM #129
-
11-30-2012, 07:08 AM #130
-
11-30-2012, 07:09 AM #131
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Canada City, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 15,337
- Rep Power: 4541
I am pretty much amoral when it concerns war. I think of a nation as an entity. Now, what that nation does has to be in it's own best interest. However, I am not a hawk in that I think war is always the answer....often diplomacy and goodwill abroad is a strong way to get what you want. War is the natural state oof man, however...it does happen from time to time. I think that the committment of the lives of armed servicemen ought to be in pursuit of something worth it. It is also a disservice to use their lives inefficiently as well. Hence why I semi-support Afghanistan (just cause after 9/11...incompetant conduct of the war for a long time)....Iraq was a poor decision in that it was unnecessary, incompetent, and also terrible for the US' international reputation.
If you wish to get into a discussion of Vietnam I will, but generally I feel in the Cold War context (and ONLY the cold war context) it was a just cause in Realist terms to combat communism (although the justification that it was any sort of humanitarian mission was both disingenuous and laughable). However it was incompetantly managed and therefore was an embarressment. That war is so nuanced and complicated, however, and hardly anyone has a working knowledge of the intricacies so generally I get stuck arguing with moronic pacifists or just as moronic redneck hawks who think all the war needed was nukes or something stupid.Manifest Density
-
11-30-2012, 07:19 AM #132
- Join Date: Mar 2011
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 1,441
- Rep Power: 1115
-
-
11-30-2012, 07:19 AM #133
-
11-30-2012, 07:24 AM #134
-
11-30-2012, 07:27 AM #135
-
11-30-2012, 07:27 AM #136
-
-
11-30-2012, 07:28 AM #137
-
11-30-2012, 07:33 AM #138
-
11-30-2012, 07:41 AM #139
-
11-30-2012, 07:43 AM #140
-
-
11-30-2012, 07:48 AM #141
-
11-30-2012, 07:51 AM #142
*I think people have a right to live their lives as they please as long as they are not harming others.
*The constitution protects us as a nation and sets basic guidelines to keep government in check.
*The educational system and media in the US purposefully dumb people down to socially engineer brainwashed idiots.
-
11-30-2012, 07:53 AM #143
-
11-30-2012, 07:56 AM #144
-
-
11-30-2012, 07:56 AM #145
-
11-30-2012, 07:58 AM #146
-
11-30-2012, 07:58 AM #147
-
11-30-2012, 08:01 AM #148
Homosexuality is a mental illness.
Science and religion go hand in hand, not one disproving the other.
Majority of people that back science fail to adhere to a fundamental law of science: creativity and imagination without bias.
I.e failed scientists.Asian dude from Milwaukee
~Trinity&LBM appreciation crew~
-
-
11-30-2012, 08:02 AM #149
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Alexandria, Louisiana, United States
- Age: 31
- Posts: 3,625
- Rep Power: 2525
This is very interesting. I'll share mine
1. You should have to own land or be the head of a 3+ person(one being a child) household to vote.
2. There should be tests to take to determine whether you are fit to have a child, just as there are tests to take to determine whether you're fit to adopt.
3. Abortions should be encouraged and free for those that can not support the child.✰ OFFICIAL MISC RUNNING CREW ✰
-
11-30-2012, 08:04 AM #150
Bookmarks