Has anyone here experienced Windows 8 by upgrade or purchase? If so, what do you think?
My opinion, I think it may make business owners like me balk at buying it if they buy new computers, because of the learning curve.
Could Windows 8 ultimately be another Vista?
|
Thread: Windows 8
-
10-26-2012, 11:39 AM #1
-
10-26-2012, 12:04 PM #2
-
10-26-2012, 12:12 PM #3
-
10-26-2012, 12:18 PM #4
I think you can get it:
http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/...3ee2csi3Sar42s
Brings up a great point. Most new computers after this month will be pre-loaded with Windows 8. If so, can you uninstall and install Linux or Ubuntu or any other OS?
-
-
10-26-2012, 12:20 PM #5
-
10-26-2012, 12:49 PM #6
-
10-26-2012, 12:58 PM #7
I have it on 2 machines here at work for testing purposes. It is....um......something very different. I kind of understand where they are trying to go, but they should give the end user the option to turn off the new "live tile" screen and go back to the standard window's interface. It is designed more for a touch interface, than a mouse point and click interface. The underside is still very much windows 7, even some apps in the control panel are labeled windows 7. From a corporate business standpoint, we will be skipping windows 8 and will continue to use windows 7. There is no added benefit to this OS and agreed that the learning curve would be just too much for our end users to handle. I'm sure with enough backlash, they will offer an option to go back to the standard interface.
-
10-26-2012, 01:06 PM #8
-
-
10-26-2012, 01:07 PM #9
-
10-26-2012, 02:47 PM #10
-
10-26-2012, 02:51 PM #11
-
10-26-2012, 02:58 PM #12
-
-
10-26-2012, 03:02 PM #13
- Join Date: Dec 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 57
- Posts: 22,621
- Rep Power: 47700
Yeah, thats the downside, you cannot (easily) install it on any computer other then a Mac. On the other hand in my experience the Apple laptops I've owned have all been of significantly higher quality then any PC of any type that I've owned. I don't like where they are headed though, I can see in the not to distant future where they'll lock down the OS so that only software approved by, and sold through the app store is allowed. If that day should come I'll be moving on to Linux for sure.
I'm a sad little man
-
10-26-2012, 03:04 PM #14
-
10-26-2012, 03:09 PM #15
-
10-26-2012, 03:13 PM #16
To ask a really stupid question, what are the advantages of using Windows 8? Is it that much better than the '7' version? (Serious question from a computer halfwit).
"Don't call me Miss Kitty. Just...don't."--Catnip. Check out the Catnip Trilogy on Amazon.com
"Chivalry isn't dead. It just wears a skirt."--Twisted, the YA gender bender deal of the century!
Check out my links to Mr. Taxi, Star Maps, and other fine YA Action/Romance novels at http://www.amazon.com/J.S.-Frankel/e/B004XUUTB8/ref=dp_byline_cont_ebooks_1
-
-
10-26-2012, 03:13 PM #17
-
10-26-2012, 03:17 PM #18
-
10-26-2012, 03:24 PM #19
I hate the migration to the one-size-fits-all tablet-esque look that everyone is adopting be it Win8, OSX (yes, more tablet like by the version), or Ubuntu/Gnome 3. At least Win8 and Ubuntu preserve the same back end, which is handy for doing work and development unlike IOS v OSX. I'm really disappointed in the whole trend but I guess that's where the money is. I still use OSX (6.8) for daily work and I love it; quick, stable, and easy to maintain. I also like my Centos5 and 6 boxes as well. I'll take a fork in the eye before going back to Win, any version.
harumpf2 + 2 = 5 (for extremely large values of 2)
Try SCE to AUX
-
10-26-2012, 03:27 PM #20
I have experienced this with a few companies (insurance and others) who had questions about the suitability of 'significant upgrades'... this time being windows95... and will suggest to you what we did with them.
Firstly, YES... windows 8 has a 'standard' operating mode... and it is not difficult to select. That would make step 1 easier...
What we did was 1) Setup ONE machine to test for proper integration of new2old... (and by old Im talking Novell 4 network!) and documented the issues found, and if they were problems with actual software operations OR problems with interfacing to Novell... Most all of the issues WE were able to adjust Windows95 to correct.
and 2) THEN upgrade ALL machines (one at a time) to 95 and ensure that they all were configured EXACTLY as the first... (finding some hardware incompatabilities along the way... they werent ALL 'exactly alike' as we found out)...
For those wanting to work with RT (the ARM-based version), only a few things like (most of) Office have already been ported to the processor, but I doubt there will be much lag-time for most of the popular programs...
I would definately look into it....
-
-
10-26-2012, 03:33 PM #21
-
10-26-2012, 03:36 PM #22
- Join Date: Dec 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 57
- Posts: 22,621
- Rep Power: 47700
-
10-26-2012, 03:40 PM #23
-
10-26-2012, 03:40 PM #24
-
-
10-26-2012, 04:00 PM #25
-
10-26-2012, 04:29 PM #26
-
10-26-2012, 04:44 PM #27
Actually Im surprised that it's taken so long... Touch-screen capability has been around for a LONG TIME... even on CRT displays... but then they were 'mouse' interfaced and required no major paradigm-shift... the only true reason it was delayed was a lack of 'utility' in everyday working...
Then came the 'flat-face' phones... and now everybody thinks mice are for cats...
... but I still will not buy a 'computer' if it does not come with/work with a keyboard of some sort. I have 6 'tablets' now (in varying stages of operability ) and only recently found an onscreen kybd that I am willing to use consistently... but I'll still go for 'hardware' first.
I have had 8 running for a short time (no dual-boot) and look forward to seeing it on the Surface... might even buy one. I will even consider 'penquinizing' my W7 laptop at that point... but will have to 'wait & see'...
Moreover, Im glad Microsoft 'kicked the OEMs in the pants' and built the Surface... as far as Im concerned, the PC makers have been dragging their collective feet for TOO long, and have no right to whine that MS did what theyve been avoiding. HP got a start, (and if w8 had already been available, might have been THE 'It' machine already), but should have 'kicked MS in the pants' to get them doing exactly what they did with Windows 8/RT...
... and I do agree... they dont have to ALL look the same, simply because you have to touch them to use them.
Last edited by justboo2u; 10-26-2012 at 04:52 PM.
-
10-26-2012, 06:42 PM #28
Isn't the joke that Windows releases are like Star Trek movies? (every other one sucks)
I think the default interface for Windows 8 looks hideous.
That's quite a big leap there. The Gatekeeper they added to the latest version of OS X can easily be configured to allow an unsigned program to run or to disable Gatekeeper completely. I'd be very skeptical they would lock out 3rd party applications completely with no workaround.
Sweet! One less person in line in front of me to get the new shiny i-Things.There will come a day when I tire of listening to 80's music. That day is not today.
I Really Miss The Old BodySpace
-O35 5'8" Crew- -Karl_Hungus Crew-
-
-
10-26-2012, 06:57 PM #29
- Join Date: Dec 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 57
- Posts: 22,621
- Rep Power: 47700
-
10-26-2012, 09:03 PM #30
Bookmarks