Why don't we have separate locker room for homosexuals?

[NYbrah]

we can bro. but we should compromise (thats how it works in politics). i want lockers separated by race also, to account for crime levels (put the brutes with the brutes)

we already have lockers separated by sexuality. not having separate lockers for gays is discrimination.

[abopetrolsniff]

we already have lockers separated by sexuality. not having separate lockers for gays is discrimination.

discrimination is disadvantageous and done for arbitrary reasons. women and men are seperated due to biological sexual differences. what do you want to do with people who identify as bisexual, transsexual, pansexual, etc.?

its too costly and bureaucratic to run a program like this. but i suppose concepts like transaction costs are too difficult for you to understand

[xzp]

because unlike OP who is a *******, I'm pretty sure most homosexuals aren't some cock-fiending monsters who just love to see you undress in the Lockerroom.

Because, sex =\= sexual preference.

[proudmanlet]

Isn't it just pretty old fashioned that we even have locker "rooms" at all? I mean why do we need a separate room, why not just have lockers, showers, sinks, toilets, etc out on the gym floor and everybody-male, female, gay, straight, tranny, whatever-just all do their business out in the open. a gym without walls, I mean come on ppl it's the 21st century

[klapo]

completely agree with OP, never thought about it before, repped

[NYbrah]

discrimination is disadvantageous and done for arbitrary reasons. women and men are seperated due to biological sexual differences. what do you want to do with people who identify as bisexual, transsexual, pansexual, etc.?

its too costly and bureaucratic to run a program like this. but i suppose concepts like transaction costs are too difficult for you to understand

why cant we use this same logic in gay marriage

[xSlick1x]

OP is right roll bread or not.



We separate the sexes so you're not changing in front of anyone who is attracted to you and you're not receiving unwanted attention. I can't think of any more unwanted attention than a dude checking out my balls.




It will never happen though because we live in a ******* lib society where the many have to suffer to spare the few's feelings. If it would make the gay population (the minority) feel offended than it's completely unacceptable and hate filled but if it would make the straight population (vast majority) feel the same then it means we're just bigots or homophobes. Stupid fukking world...

[Cheesecanman]

if a straight guy lies and say he is gay then he wont be ever able to marry another female. if a a gay lies then he wont be able to marry same sex.

What about the people that change sexuality later in life? They won't be able to marry the new sexuality they are attracted to? Seems fair.

[ectofitness]

agreed with OP.

lol'd at everyone saying it will be too expensive.

Well, it's not too expensive to make 2 locker rooms, male and female right? We could just go total co-ed, and it would in fact be cheaper.

also lol at everyone ITT saying it's discrimination. How's it discrimination when gay men don't belong with other men? They're biologically attracted to other men. By that logic, I could go into a female locker room and say "it's okay for me to be here because I'm sexually attracted to you."

Just co-ed this ****, or make a 3rd locker.

[NYbrah]

What about the people that change sexuality later in life? They won't be able to marry the new sexuality they are attracted to? Seems fair.

common u cant change ur sexuality., just like u cant change your race, etc. atleast thats what gay supporters say

[Groundhog2109]

Interesting question OP but I think when you start making exceptions like separate gay bathrooms you open up the door to way too many inefficient options. For example, what about dudes that are Bi? Would they be allowed to go to both bathrooms or would you need to create one separate for them? And Bi-girls? Up to 6 bathrooms now...and transgender? 8 bathrooms. Transgender AND bi? Obviously this is a bit extreme but hopefully you get the point I'm making.

I actually think gender neutral restrooms with private stalls are the future of bathrooms. They already do this in a bunch metropolitan clubs/restaurants and foreign countries.

[Cheesecanman]

common u cant change ur sexuality., just like u cant change your race, etc. atleast thats what gay supporters say

I think when they say that you can't change sexuality they mean out of choice, but it can change naturally.

[nicolastafur]

OP is retarded. Bathrooms are separated by gender and not sexuality.

[abopetrolsniff]

Isn't it just pretty old fashioned that we even have locker "rooms" at all? I mean why do we need a separate room, why not just have lockers, showers, sinks, toilets, etc out on the gym floor and everybody-male, female, gay, straight, tranny, whatever-just all do their business out in the open. a gym without walls, I mean come on ppl it's the 21st century

public indecency. you some kind of naturist/hedonist?

why cant we use this same logic in gay marriage

why is marriage even a government thing at all. plus i dont care what 2 consenting adults choose to do so long as it doesnt harm anyone else (protip: your feelings getting hurt doesnt count)

OP is right roll bread or not.



We separate the sexes so you're not changing in front of anyone who is attracted to you and you're not receiving unwanted attention. I can't think of any more unwanted attention than a dude checking out my balls.




It will never happen though because we live in a ******* lib society where the many have to suffer to spare the few's feelings. If it would make the gay population (the minority) feel offended than it's completely unacceptable and hate filled but if it would make the straight population (vast majority) feel the same then it means we're just bigots or homophobes. Stupid fukking world...

right bro, i suppose you better avert your eyes from all women in public. dont stare at their cleavage or their asses covered only with tights. gotta remove that unwanted attention right?

[abopetrolsniff]

agreed with OP.

lol'd at everyone saying it will be too expensive.

Well, it's not too expensive to make 2 locker rooms, male and female right? We could just go total co-ed, and it would in fact be cheaper.

also lol at everyone ITT saying it's discrimination. How's it discrimination when gay men don't belong with other men? They're biologically attracted to other men. By that logic, I could go into a female locker room and say "it's okay for me to be here because I'm sexually attracted to you."

Just co-ed this ****, or make a 3rd locker.

yes you are right, coed seems to be the most efficient way to go about it

[FixFox]

lol interesting point. makes sense too. was trying to find a flaw with the sexuality on id, but can't find any apart from changing your sexuality, but then again being gay is genetic isnt it. (srs, no hate)

[polofreak]

who cares if some batty boy stares at your dick

This

[germanviking]

I always lol when the historically "oppressed" people, turn around and do the oppressing so easily. Nothing sweeter.

[BlackJack619]

Everyone is just talking about gym locker rooms you guys haven't even thought about talking about military living quarters.

[RealityKings]

ITT - OP makes a valid point.

Why should we have to share locker rooms with homosexuals?
I don't want people staring at my ass or penis. If that is cool, then let me share locker rooms with females. There is no difference.

[taj51]

You bring up a great point OP. However, until you hear of a gay rape occurring in a locker room/changing room (whether it be between men or women) nobody will ever do anything about it which is really unfortunate.

Such is life in 2012

[Enguin]

discrimination is disadvantageous and done for arbitrary reasons. women and men are seperated due to biological sexual differences. what do you want to do with people who identify as bisexual, transsexual, pansexual, etc.?

its too costly and bureaucratic to run a program like this. but i suppose concepts like transaction costs are too difficult for you to understand

Transsexuals break your biological reason.

[kazamman]

the gays use the female locker rooms and the manly lesbians use the mens locker room
/thread

[Comandante12]

Locker rooms are based only on different genders, not sexual preference. You keep saying sexuality, no, that's incorrect. Based on one's gender.


You would have a LOGICAL, legitimate argument for hermaphrodites or someone who wasn't male or female, etc.

You go into the locker room of your sex(again, not sexual preference).

[eac1005]

OP, if one extrapolates your logic, then we should also consider racial segregation, right?

[Jaccogo]

Interesting question OP but I think when you start making exceptions like separate gay bathrooms you open up the door to way too many inefficient options. For example, what about dudes that are Bi? Would they be allowed to go to both bathrooms or would you need to create one separate for them? And Bi-girls? Up to 6 bathrooms now...and transgender? 8 bathrooms. Transgender AND bi? Obviously this is a bit extreme but hopefully you get the point I'm making.

I actually think gender neutral restrooms with private stalls are the future of bathrooms. They already do this in a bunch metropolitan clubs/restaurants and foreign countries.

no, you aren't obligated to accommodate a group unless it is both recognized as legitimate and large enough to be considered as impactful

[Schism45]

Lolling hard at this thread. Not a single logical argument against OP was seen that day.

Although the real, consistent answer is one changing room for all, not segregating further.

[Jaccogo]

Locker rooms are based only on different genders, not sexual preference. You keep saying sexuality, no, that's incorrect. Based on one's gender.


You would have a LOGICAL, legitimate argument for hermaphrodites or someone who wasn't male or female, etc.

You go into the locker room of your sex(again, not sexual preference).

So the real question is why do we separate boys and girls? Is it not for public decency? Is it not because human girls don't like to be seen naked by human boys (potential mates), and vice versa? There's privacy involved, but the sexes aren't typically uncomfortable with each other because they aren't potential mates.

And that is where OPs' argument becomes valid.

You could argue there aren't enough homos to validate their own locker room, but you can't say that it's wrong to have a locker room based on being a homo

[Newmanzz]

gays with females
lesbians with the males








op would be with the retards

[NYbrah]

OP, if one extrapolates your logic, then we should also consider racial segregation, right?

logic not even once