Bodybuilding.com Information Motivation Supplementation
in:

    The World’s #1 Bodybuilding And Fitness Forum - Save Up To 50% Off Retail Prices In Our Bodybuilding.com Store!

Reply
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Ho ho_124's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2005
    Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Age: 24
    Stats: 179 lbs
    Posts: 8,283
    BodyPoints: 3124
    Rep Power: 3927
    ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) ho_124 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit ho_124's BodySpace
    ho_124 is offline

    Parallel to ATG squats

    For the longest time I've been doing parallel squats. Always thought ATG was bad for your knees etc. But I looked into it and it seems that they are fine to do. I notice that when I do parallel squats I don't feel it in the upper quads that much, mostly in my lower quads. Also don't really feel the hamstrings working that much. I've heard that with ATG you recruit your hamstrings much more? Anyone had an experience when switching to ATG squats? How were results.

    Tomorrow is leg day, thinking of just dropping the ego, going with lower weight and going ATG for reps.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Encyclochuzzle chazzy1864's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Lakeland, Florida, United States
    Age: 29
    Stats: 5'11", 190 lbs
    Posts: 51,610
    BodyPoints: 310
    Rep Power: 115671
    chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) chazzy1864 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit chazzy1864's BodySpace
    chazzy1864 is offline
    I'm trying to figure out why if you were actually hitting parallel, that it would be somehow exponentially safer on the knees than ATG, considering the range of motion isn't that much farther.
    -
    Alchemist of Alcohol
    -
    Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=126418493
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User TitanBaby's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2012
    Stats: 6'0", 190 lbs
    Posts: 113
    Rep Power: 12
    TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) TitanBaby is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Visit TitanBaby's BodySpace
    TitanBaby is offline
    full depth phaggot
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Training For Chest Hair rdferguson's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Location: A house on a hill, Australia
    Stats: 5'7", 144 lbs
    Posts: 5,756
    Rep Power: 8142
    rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) rdferguson has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit rdferguson's BodySpace
    rdferguson is offline
    Most correctly performed ATG squats aren't very far below parallel. ATG squats generally aren't achieved by doing a normal "parallel" (by which I assume you mean something you'd expect to see from a powerlifter) squat and then going deeper, which tends to create a rather demented squat. Instead, they're achieved by having a more upright back and pushing the knees further forward, so that the arse has to be lower in order to break parallel. This results in greater knee flexion at the bottom of the squat, which simultaneously increases emphasis on the quads and takes tension out of the hamstrings. At the same time, the more upright back angle tends to reduce the amount of hip flexion at the bottom of the squat, which also takes tension off the hamstrings. Thus the ATG squat becomes very quad dominant, with some good glute involvement, but not as much hamstring work. This phenomonen is further exaggerated in the front squat, which is almost all quadriceps, some glutes, and almost negligeable hamstring involvement. Whoever said that deeper = more hamstrings doesn't properly understand how the hamstrings work, or has over-simplified things to the point of inaccuracy. Hamstrings concentrically perform hip extension and knee flexion, and eccentrically resist hip flexion and knee extension. So to maximise hamstring involvement in the squat, it's not a matter of going deeper, it's a matter bending at the hips as much as possible while minimising the ROM at the knees.
    Last edited by rdferguson; 11-08-2012 at 05:02 PM.
    SQ 2x150kg BP 95kg DL 190kg OHP 60kg @ 70kg

    You can work out without training, but you can't train without working out.

    The noob effect, as explained by Greg Everett: "You take someone who's totally sedentary and you can get 'em stronger by making them pick their nose vigorously for an hour a day."

    http://onemoreplate.blogspot.com.au/
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User avigotsky's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2011
    Location: West Nyack, New York, United States
    Age: 22
    Stats: 5'10", 190 lbs
    Posts: 143
    Rep Power: 118
    avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) avigotsky has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit avigotsky's BodySpace
    avigotsky is offline
    Thought this study was interesting and seems relevant.

    Effect of Squat Depth and Barbell Load on Relative Muscular Effort in Squatting
    Bryanton, Megan A.1; Kennedy, Michael D.2; Carey, Jason P.3; Chiu, Loren Z.F.1
    Abstract: Bryanton, MA, Kennedy, MD, Carey, JP, and Chiu, LZF. Effect of squat depth and barbell load on relative muscular effort in squatting. J Strength Cond Res 26(10): 2820–2828, 2012—Resistance training is used to develop muscular strength and hypertrophy. Large muscle forces, in relation to the muscle's maximum force–generating ability, are required to elicit these adaptations. Previous biomechanical analyses of multi-joint resistance exercises provide estimates of muscle force but not relative muscular effort (RME). The purpose of this investigation was to determine the RME during the squat exercise. Specifically, the effects of barbell load and squat depth on hip extensor, knee extensor, and ankle plantar flexor RME were examined. Ten strength-trained women performed squats (50–90% 1 repetition maximum) in a motion analysis laboratory to determine hip extensor, knee extensor, and ankle plantar flexor net joint moment (NJM). Maximum isometric strength in relation to joint angle for these muscle groups was also determined. Relative muscular effect was determined as the ratio of NJM to maximum voluntary torque matched for joint angle. Barbell load and squat depth had significant interaction effects on hip extensor, knee extensor, and ankle plantar flexor RME (p < 0.05). Knee extensor RME increased with greater squat depth but not barbell load, whereas the opposite was found for the ankle plantar flexors. Both greater squat depth and barbell load increased hip extensor RME. These data suggest that training for the knee extensors can be performed with low relative intensities but require a deep squat depth. Heavier barbell loads are required to train the hip extensors and ankle plantar flexors. In designing resistance training programs with multi-joint exercises, how external factors influence RME of different muscle groups should be considered to meet training objectives.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Sir Urq Quake215's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2012
    Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    Stats: 6'2", 207 lbs
    Posts: 213
    Rep Power: 8
    Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000) Quake215 is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Visit Quake215's BodySpace
    Quake215 is offline
    Originally Posted by ho_124 View Post
    For the longest time I've been doing parallel squats. Always thought ATG was bad for your knees etc. But I looked into it and it seems that they are fine to do. I notice that when I do parallel squats I don't feel it in the upper quads that much, mostly in my lower quads. Also don't really feel the hamstrings working that much. I've heard that with ATG you recruit your hamstrings much more? Anyone had an experience when switching to ATG squats? How were results.

    Tomorrow is leg day, thinking of just dropping the ego, going with lower weight and going ATG for reps.
    I feel that ATG is the only way to go. But I do notice tension on my hamstrings because of how deep I go. Personally I would say do those, I think going to the ground would be way more rewarding than squatting halfway down. just use a lighter weight going to the ground
    215.
    Army.
    Penn State.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User Engineer_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2010
    Age: 27
    Stats: 6'0", 190 lbs
    Posts: 9,409
    Rep Power: 13478
    Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) Engineer_Guy has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit Engineer_Guy's BodySpace
    Engineer_Guy is offline
    IMO the best way for the majority of people to squat is to keep the torso upright, bringing the hips between the legs and on the same plane on the ankle joints. The goal should be to have the hamstrings completely on the calves. This is the most balanced way to train the musculature of the legs and the best way to train for strength in the legs.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User tidnab's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2012
    Age: 32
    Posts: 2,416
    Rep Power: 3442
    tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) tidnab has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    tidnab is offline
    If you really want hamstring involvement with your squats, I would suggest low bar squats. High bar back squats will have relatively more hamstring involvement than front squats, but it is not particularly a hamstring dominant exercise. All squats, when done to full depth, will hit your glutes however. A parallel high bar squat OTOH will have limited glute involvement.
    Last edited by tidnab; 11-08-2012 at 11:51 AM. Reason: typo
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Registered User stealthmedia's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2012
    Location: Northridge, California, United States
    Age: 22
    Stats: 5'9", 160 lbs
    Posts: 952
    Rep Power: 138
    stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) stealthmedia has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Visit stealthmedia's BodySpace
    stealthmedia is offline
    Originally Posted by Quake215 View Post
    I feel that ATG is the only way to go. But I do notice tension on my hamstrings because of how deep I go. Personally I would say do those, I think going to the ground would be way more rewarding than squatting halfway down. just use a lighter weight going to the ground
    I think you are mistaking hams for glutes there a little bit.
    vvvvvvvv

    Originally Posted by tidnab View Post
    If you really want hamstring involvement with your squats, I would suggest low bar squats. High bar back squats will have more relatively hamstring involvement than front squats, but it is not particularly a hamstring dominant exercise. All squats, when done to full depth, will hit your glutes however. A parallel high bar squat OTOH will have limited glute involvement.
    SQ: 225x5 (High-bar ATG)
    DL: 295x5/315x1

    "Many basic or compound exercises (e.g. squat, bench press, etc.) have a bell shaped resistance curves or shift the resistance through multiple muscle groups throughout the exercise's range of motion allowing the muscles to momentarily relax between repetitions. This period of momentary relaxation between repetitions allows greater opportunity for momentary blood flow permitting the clearing of acid accumulation."
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Banned nosaj7's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Texas, United States
    Stats: 6'2", 235 lbs
    Posts: 6,315
    Rep Power: 0
    nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000) nosaj7 has reached the pinnacle! Best possible rank! (+1000000)
    Visit nosaj7's BodySpace
    nosaj7 is offline
    Box squats and no need to worry bout grass stains. Or shartin on yourself
    Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads

  1. Parallel vs ATG squats
    By Sugars420 in forum Exercises
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-01-2012, 02:19 PM
  2. I'm doing madcow but want to switch back to atg squats
    By discombobulat3d in forum Powerlifting/Strongman
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-08-2011, 02:44 AM
  3. going from parallel to atg squats
    By emerica1184 in forum Teen Bodybuilding
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-14-2010, 02:55 PM
  4. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-27-2009, 01:56 PM
  5. The move to ATG squats and Better Form
    By JonnyStead in forum Over Age 35
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 12-18-2008, 07:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Home Store Products Careers Help Contact Us Terms of Use Checkout