|
-
10-13-2012, 06:29 AM #61
-
10-13-2012, 06:34 AM #62
-
10-13-2012, 06:47 AM #63
-
10-13-2012, 08:02 AM #64
-
-
10-13-2012, 08:03 AM #65
This is the way I personally see it.
Let's assume X is the variable representing how good someone's bodybuilding genetics are. 10X Being the highest and 5X being average.
The average black guy is gonna have a higher X value than the average white, asian, arab ( All other none-black) races. IN AVERAGE. However, people with the ratings of 10X are present in all race. Therefore, there are white, arab, etc guys that have the rating of 10X, which is essentially the equivalent of the rating a black guy with the best bodybuilding genetics would have. Though the average black guy is probably at 8X, while the average white guy is 6.5x
Strong bro science, but this is what I believe. Why? the average gym rat that I see juicing if hes black he looks way better than the white guy that is on gear. The average natty black guy that is dedicated looks better than the average white guy that is dedicated. At the same time, you have Olympia winners like Yates, Arnold, etc that were competing against the best and won, which means 10X bodybuilding genetics are present in white/other races, but just less common. Good example being top 10 Olympia line up being consistent of 7 blacks.Last edited by Wayacrucis; 10-13-2012 at 08:09 AM.
-
10-13-2012, 08:10 AM #66
Superior?
No.
I do think some races tend to have certain advantages/weaknesses in some areas but not all. There's always exceptions.
Takes calves for example- many folks from African descent have high insertion points, Asians tend to have lower insertion points, caucasians tend to be in the middle. But calves do not encompass winning a bb'ing show.
I think it all evens out in the end.
-
10-13-2012, 08:45 AM #67
-
10-13-2012, 08:49 AM #68
-
-
10-13-2012, 08:51 AM #69
-
10-13-2012, 09:29 AM #70
-
10-13-2012, 10:38 AM #71
I'm just making stuff up here, but there may be a shred of truth in it:
Rich white kids sit around on the couch playing Xbox eating Doritos all day long.
Poor minority kids go outside and run and climb all day long.
Kids who grow up with an active lifestyle are more likely to be better athletes than sedentary ones.
It might be that black athletes are proportionately over-represented at the Olympia simply because from a cultural perspective they are more likely to be joining hardcore gyms. The white population is more likely to jump on the latest DVD workout fad.
-
10-13-2012, 10:38 AM #72
-
-
10-13-2012, 10:40 AM #73
This reminds me of the short vs tall build debate. While it's true that most pros are 5'10" or shorter, Arnold, Gunter, Lou Ferrigno, Toney Freeman, and a number of other tall bodybuilders became champions. Similarly, Franco, Chris Dickerson, Lee Priest, Shawn Ray and many other short bodybuilders made it to the top as well.
-
10-13-2012, 10:58 AM #74
-
10-13-2012, 11:09 AM #75
-
10-13-2012, 11:21 AM #76
-
-
10-13-2012, 11:26 AM #77
You make some interesting points. First of all, my friend from South Africa wasn't discussing his country at all, but was commenting on the labeling practices of black people in North America. This whole "my ancestors come from there" theory is too complicated. You live somewhere now and were born there, as were your parents, grandparents and so forth......well you are JUST that. I am European originally, but my people came to Europe from Asia. I am not Asian European. Plus with it IS exactly this type of labeling which creates separation between people, or rather the focus on it. People care too much and place too much emphasis on their nationality, race, religion. We are all just people.
Also we tend to not be able to make generalizations about any sort of racial issue, even when they are true. There is a reason stereotypes are around. It is because there is a lot of time some truth behind it. Like the fact that Chinese ARE good at math. They are......I am not being racist, but look at the Math Olympics every year. THEY DOMINATE. Maybe the question should be why? Maybe it is not genetic but has more to do with the teaching system, which is what most people think, or maybe it is a little bit of both.
But I hate political correctness where you can not say anything generalizing. Of course as with any generalization there are going to be exceptions, but OVERALL you will be more right than wrong. Just like that, my point of black people being better genetically gifted to bodybuilding is OVERALL correct in my mind.
-
10-13-2012, 11:28 AM #78
Good post. There is such genetic diversity in Africa, it would blow people's minds. After all current science believes humanity itself comes from the African continent.
Here is more detail and I might repeat myself slightly.. read the bold parts specifically and how it may translate to bodybuilding itself. Think fatloss/muscle gain/ and ability to handle dehydration.
people from different parts of Africa, and even tribe to tribe varied greatly in genetics, so much so, that the differences can be greater than that of a caucasian and an asian.
(So people that share a skin color and features aren't necessarily genetically closely tied)
What was interesting is certain groups had unique genetic characteristics, such as, one tribe had genes that enabled them to utilize oxygen far better, for running and athletics.
Another tribe (bushmen) had a unique genetic expression where they had an extra taste bud sense.. they can taste test plants and leaves, and tell if one is poisonous over another based on that.
Fascinating stuff!
Examples:
The south African genomes will also make geneticists re-evaluate what they know about how our genes affect our health and risk of disease. Our current knowledge in this area is incredibly biased towards Western societies and the results of studies in such populations don't always translate to other continents. For example, one of the Bushmen had a SNP that is reputedly linked to Wolman's syndrome, a disease that prevents people from storing fat properly and kills at a young age. Try telling that to the eighty-something gentleman! Hayes says, "!Gubi is a very fit and healthy man and much better skipper on a skipping rope than I am
All of the Bushmen had a version of the vitamin D receptor that is associated with denser bones and three of them have a variant linked to better sprinting performance. Some of the SNPs grant the carrier the ability to taste bitter plant chemicals, and hunter-gatherers would certainly find it useful to avoid toxic plants. One of !Gubi's variants could allow him to break down foreign substances or resist parasites. Another might make his kidneys better at reaborsbing vital chloride ions and reduce the loss of salt and water, an important skill when you live in the scorching desert.
Other differences are perhaps more surprising - the five Africans all lack a genetic variant that is specific to Africa and that grants resistance against malaria. It's possible that the Bushmen may not need such resistance. But that could well change as their populations dwindle and they become forced into agricultural lifestyles, which carry higher risks of disease. Again, these newfound genetic markers could allow scientists to watch how they adapt to such challenges at a genetic level.
Last edited by weltweitefurcht; 10-13-2012 at 11:42 AM.
-
10-13-2012, 11:31 AM #79
Black men tend to have more fast-twitch muscle fibers which is good for sprinting, basketball, boxing, etc.
White men tend to have more slow-twitch muscle mass, just look at powerlifting and strong man competitions. Nearly all the world's strongest men are white. Consider the traditional builds of historically white groups like the Vikings, Spartans, Celts etc. Many consider them the world's fiercest warriors.
There is also an issue of shading. The color black or any dark color for that matter further excentuates the muscle tone of the body. That is why when white men are tan they tend to look leaner and more muscular.
Seeing as bodybuilding is a hybrid of sheer mass/strength and appearance, I think it is fair to say that both races are pretty much on the same level with whites, genetically speaking, having more slow twitch muscle fibres (strength/mass) and blacks having more fast twitch muscle fibres and dark skin (aesthetic/appearance).
-
10-13-2012, 11:36 AM #80
-
-
10-13-2012, 11:38 AM #81
-
10-13-2012, 11:40 AM #82
-
10-13-2012, 11:43 AM #83
Just completely false.
Both are fast twitch dominated.
Doing 1,000 bodyweight squats or Power Cleans would be slow twitch dominated. Anaerobic/maximal force/strength work is primarily fast twitch, aerobic/endurance work is primarily slow twitch. This is not hard to double check.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle
(Not linearly relevant, but sort of ish: Take a guy who deadlifts 1,000lbs. Halfway through the movement, the weight magically disappears. Think he'll still grind to the top slowly while exerting that pulling force?)Last edited by Penile_Dementia; 10-13-2012 at 11:49 AM.
Feathered Nether Regions
-
10-13-2012, 11:50 AM #84
You're right, I stand corrected.
http://163.178.103.176/Tema1G/Grupos...GATP20/c34.htm
Your athletes' fiber type proportion will playa major role in the amount of weight that they can lift, the number of repetitions that they can complete in a set or interval workout, and the desired outcome (increased muscular strength/power or endurance).
For example, an athlete with a greater proportion of fast- twitch fibers will not be able to complete as many repetitions at a given relative amount of weight as will an athlete with a greater proportion of slow-twitch fibers and therefore will never attain as high a level of muscular endurance as will the ST -fibered athlete.
Similarly, an athlete with a greater proportion of ST fibers will not be able to lift as heavy a weight or run intervals as fast as will an athlete with a greater proportion of FT fibers and therefore will never be as strong or powerful as will the FT - fibered athlete.
The deadlift being performed by 2009 IPF World Champion Dean Bowring
How many of these guys are black? Looking at the names and countries, I would lean toward saying, not many...Last edited by Canuck77; 10-13-2012 at 12:06 PM.
-
-
10-13-2012, 11:56 AM #85
-
10-13-2012, 12:04 PM #86
While strongman involves levels of strength endurance there is no question it is primarily a strength/anaerobic/fast twitch sport.
Between far greater training and practise prominence in particular cultures, and northern Europeans having a higher fast twitch count than you might assume. Not to mention body structure, bones, joints etc. There is no real mystery, except maybe the exact weighting of these variables.Feathered Nether Regions
-
10-13-2012, 12:07 PM #87
-
10-13-2012, 12:08 PM #88
-
-
10-13-2012, 12:11 PM #89
i think they have superior genetics...on average
Maybe they don't store as much as fat as Caucasians do cause of their genetics cause of the temperature-way of life black people have in africa.
So when they gain weight they gain more muscle than fat on average than Caucasians do.
Not sure...just a thought of mine
Also they tend to have narrow waist-hips.I had gone to a gym and a guy was going there x3 per week...not having a real routine and he was lifting weights for 2 years.
8-9% body fat of peace with super narrow waist and full-round muscles.Srsly if he wasn't taking roids already he should consider start competitive bodybuilding.
He was like that with no real routine or diet
@the guy above saying why there are almost no black people in powerlifting-strongman competitions who dominate them....
i think black people tend to have small and light bones+narrow hips (less strength)
-
10-13-2012, 12:16 PM #90
I thought it was pretty obvious black people have better bodybuilding genetics. Slavery definitely has something to do with it. I remember my teacher for a nutrition course was talking about the holocaust and there are a lot of fat jews (the one's who had ancestors in the holocaust) because theyre ancestors were starved and their bodies learned to hold on to fat. Lol not sure if this is true because she was dumb bitch when it came to many things. But an interesting point when thinking about slavery, and being forced to do labor for generations. It isn't a surprise if their body/genetics made them leaner or able to build/hold onto more muscle to help them do their work.
Not just looking at olympia winners, but the overall majority of successful bodybuilders are black. There's really no denying this. Look at the top guys today, it was already pointed out the top 10 was 70% black lol.
Similar Threads
-
Arnold is losing to Dorian!
By curt_james in forum Professional BodybuildingReplies: 96Last Post: 07-28-2009, 10:18 AM
Bookmarks