I wanna get big fast, how many reps should I be doing to do that? I also kinda want to be strong too..And I consist of a push pull legs workout plan..(day 1 triceps shoulders chest, day 2 back and biceps, day 3 legs and abs)..
10-01-2012, 09:55 PM #1
10-01-2012, 10:02 PM #2
10-01-2012, 10:05 PM #3
But really, the jury's out - differences of opinion are everywhere. You have to find what works for you. Trial and error.
Luckily, no matter what rep range you're working in (within reason), you'll be getting both stronger and bigger anyway. It's a matter of degrees, not binary.
My own preference - what I've found works best *for me* - is a mix of rep ranges. Some sets in the 3-5 range, and some at anywhere from 8-20 or more. For a beginner's program, you could do some at around 5, and some at 8-10 or possibly 8-12, and get good results, I reckon.
edit: The classic arrangement is your big compounds (e.g., back squats, flat barbell bench, etc.) at a lower rep range, like 5 or so, followed by smaller lifts (e.g., hamstring curls, tricep extensions, etc.) at a higher rep range, like in the 8-12 area.
Last edited by MichaelCJ; 10-01-2012 at 10:11 PM.
10-01-2012, 11:29 PM #4
10-01-2012, 11:42 PM #5
10-02-2012, 10:03 PM #6
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 116
- Rep Power: 150
10-02-2012, 10:44 PM #7
I don't want to hijack the thread, but I believe my doubt is related to the OP question...
I am not sure how much effort is good enough for building muscle, I explain:
I tend to go not so hard on weights, do my movements slowly (mostly with a small aceleration on positive, and go slow on the negative movement - not sure if I'm expressing myself correctly in english...)
Everytime I go until failure, about 10 reps, four times(sets?) each exercise.
I keep observing some other guys in the gym, and they are lifting maybe 2-3 times more weight than me (and they are not a lot bigger than me) with extreme effort, and mostly with someone else helping them to complete the reps.
I prefer to workout alone, using the weights I can handle myself, and go 8 to 12 reps until failure. The next day, I can feel my sore muscles on the areas I worked out the day before, giving me the sensation that I'm exausting them correctly.
I take supplements, eat right, but can't see improvements in one or 2 months. I did I hit a plateau?
Should I see my muscles getting bigger on a weekly basis? Is that fast? I just can't notice my progress, and I tend to think that's normal, very slow achievements... How fast should I grow (in measurements) to understand I'm building muscle in the right pace? 5mm (on arm) in 1 month? 2 months? Is there any standard so I can monitor that?
I hope I can get myself clear. Sorry for the not so clever english.
10-02-2012, 10:55 PM #8
10-02-2012, 11:02 PM #9
Low reps = strength
High reps = size
I usually aim for failure between 6 - 10 reps
Change it up occasionaly to shock your body. EG, if you're benching 100 lbs for 10 reps, put 125 lbs one week and aim for 4 - 6 reps, then go back to your 100lbs and you should be able to do a lot more than 10! if you can, put it up to 110lbs and see how you go.
Good luck bro"When life gives you lemons, sell them and buy grapefruit" - Kai Greene 2012
10-03-2012, 07:03 AM #10
You don't need to split if you are a buck fifty beginner.
All Pro's is a great fullbody bodybuilding program that will get you more muscle, and a lot of strength and strength to go with it. And you won't have a lot of weak links. It is based on 8-12 rep sets, and "double progression", getting the reps from 8 to 12 over five weeks, then dropping back the reps and starting over with around 10% more weight.
But for it to really get you somewhere, run AP for at least a year(10 cycles).
Starting strength is not a balanced program like AP. It is a strength program heavily based on the squat. If you don't mind gaining a lot of fat by using GOMAD(gallon of milk a day!) in lieu of 'roids, is the most aggressive strength program for beginners.
You add 5lbs to your squat every session, 15lbs a week, 60lbs a month, and two plates(+180lbs!) to your squat in three months or so all going well. That should make your squatting muscles bigger, if you get the calories in. It is based on 5 rep sets, and "linear progression".
If you are afraid of a massive calorie surplus when doing SS, you probably won't get get anything like that progress(which might take about a year on All Pro's).
The old "squats and milk" programs are based on 20 rep sets for the squat, and linear progression, adding 5lbs to your squat every time you get under the bar. That should get your attention. You start light, say your 5RM, or even a lot less, GOMAD is recommended, or you get crushed.
As you can see, all rational rep ranges have a track record.
Push/pull/legs IS a great split.
What is your program?Beginners:
Beyond novice, 5 3 1 or see above:)
Unless it is obvious to anyone who isn't blind that you lift weights, you might still benefit from a little more attention to big basic barbell exercises for enough reps:).
10-03-2012, 09:02 AM #11
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: East Meadow, New York, United States
- Posts: 4,022
- Rep Power: 3739
By Locher26 in forum ExercisesReplies: 3Last Post: 12-19-2011, 04:51 PM
By Mcnasty1 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 12Last Post: 03-03-2011, 03:17 PM
By changetostay in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 11Last Post: 08-11-2010, 10:07 PM
By jsaputo in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 25Last Post: 04-22-2010, 06:51 AM
By znicks1 in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 1Last Post: 05-08-2009, 02:12 PM