Do you think that American culture makes women poor wife material?

[ParasiteComplex]

I saw this really pretty islamic girl that was probably an 8/10 and she was with her husband, like a 4/10. And I realized that's why they have their arranged marriages. Such a pairing would not happen without the influence of religion, culture, or money.

America is just following the flow of any status based society that removes aesthetics largely from the procreation factor.

On a long enough timeline of "advanced" civilization, you have those unaesthetic rich dudes phukking hbbs and you eventually end up with a population of betas. Like British people, or Indians.

[jro9999]

all it takes is 5 minutes on any social networking site to see how easy women have it, and thus how entitled they have become

Brb girl with 2000+ friends on ******** makes status complaining about relationship
Brb instantly receives attention from ~50 different guys telling her how pretty she is and how awesome she is and how they'll always be there for her

one click of a mouse, one picture on instagram, one tweet, one status update, etc and they have dozens of men drooling over them

It's pathetic, and the worst part is that kids growing nowadays think its normal

[Kharvok]

I saw this really pretty islamic girl that was probably an 8/10 and she was with her husband, like a 4/10. And I realized that's why they have their arranged marriages. Such a pairing would not happen without the influence of religion, culture, or money.

America is just following the flow of any status based society that removes aesthetics largely from the procreation factor.

On a long enough timeline of "advanced" civilization, you have those unaesthetic rich dudes phukking hbbs and you eventually end up with a population of betas. Like British people, or Indians.

Lol reppes

[fat2fit21]

all it takes is 5 minutes on any social networking site to see how easy women have it, and thus how entitled they have become

Brb girl with 2000+ friends on ******** makes status complaining about relationship
Brb instantly receives attention from ~50 different guys telling her how pretty she is and how awesome she is and how they'll always be there for her

one click of a mouse, one picture on instagram, one tweet, one status update, etc and they have dozens of men drooling over them

It's pathetic, and the worst part is that kids growing nowadays think its normal

So true

[sword_]

Does it produce self entitled stuck up women? yes.

[FsuNole7]

Does it produce self entitled stuck up women? yes.

strong bump.

this thread is a graveyard of banned miscers. First page had a bunch ITT.

[coals]

Lmao US women ( this applies to most western countries) are fk'd if they think they're on any semi-aware man's list of marriage material.


Would not ever date/ltr/marry a western women, only good for pump, dump, and flee. Since that is not my style I simply avoid them like the plague. I've yet to meet one that I would hang out with or talk to if there wasn't some sexual attraction. They tend to be vapid creatures incapable of a single coherent thought worth listening to.

[sword_]

strong bump.

this thread is a graveyard of banned miscers. First page had a bunch ITT.

OP is banned but he's still around.

[Croatbrah]

Don't need no introduction in this
I can grind in every ghetto, trying to stay hood rich

[conceptions]

Summary of necro-thread:

-All "western" women are entitled sloots.

-All men are fit this same definition of "entitled sloots" but somehow deserve 10/10s who will raise their children and do all menial domestic labor while also having a remunerative job.

-Women should be driven enough to have a career, smart enough to have an intelligent conversation, but have absolutely no problem with being demeaned into enacting outmoded gender modes.

-The misc thinks money buys love, and does not consider what a relationship might offer to a person of the opposite sex who is financially independent, although this is apparently ideal.

-Basically a paradox: the average miscer wants a woman who is fully independent--with a developed personality and life-- who will throw it all away to cater to his needs so that they're always dependent.

-The misc still has no idea what feminism is.

My input for the AM: the women worth having are individuals trying to do well in the world, just like you. They don't need or want your money. Being dependent on another person for support is just as abhorrent to them as it is to you. Why would they want to exchange a perfectly independent life for one with you? This seems like an especially obvious question considering the subservience most miscers seem to desire. A woman with those tendencies isn't going to become the woman you want to be with in the first place. All your frustration comes from expecting the traits of a driven, intelligent woman in a subservient package. The world does not work that way.

I think a relationship dynamic where partners serve each other out of real love and affection--and for no other reason-- is ideal. Like most miscers ITT, I have yet to find a partner that is worthy of that. Does that mean that I think all men are horrible? No, but I haven't found one yet who seems worth sacrificing any of my autonomy.

/rustled jimmies post that was longer than I intended and that no one will read

(fuark. let the misc get to me.)

[coals]

Summary of necro-thread:

-All "western" women are entitled sloots.

-All men are fit this same definition of "entitled sloots" but somehow deserve 10/10s who will raise their children and do all menial domestic labor while also having a remunerative job.

-Women should be driven enough to have a career, smart enough to have an intelligent conversation, but have absolutely no problem with being demeaned into enacting outmoded gender modes.

-The misc thinks money buys love, and does not consider what a relationship might offer to a person of the opposite sex who is financially independent, although this is apparently ideal.

-Basically a paradox: the average miscer wants a woman who is fully independent--with a developed personality and life-- who will throw it all away to cater to his needs so that they're always dependent.

-The misc still has no idea what feminism is.

My input for the AM: the women worth having are individuals trying to do well in the world, just like you. They don't need or want your money. Being dependent on another person for support is just as abhorrent to them as it is to you. Why would they want to exchange a perfectly independent life for one with you? This seems like an especially obvious question considering the subservience most miscers seem to desire. A woman with those tendencies isn't going to become the woman you want to be with in the first place. All your frustration comes from expecting the traits of a driven, intelligent woman in a subservient package. The world does not work that way.

I think a relationship dynamic where partners serve each other out of real love and affection--and for no other reason-- is ideal. Like most miscers ITT, I have yet to find a partner that is worthy of that. Does that mean that I think all men are horrible? No, but I haven't found one yet who seems worth sacrificing any of my autonomy.

/rustled jimmies post that was longer than I intended and that no one will read

(fuark. let the misc get to me.)

Summary:

I"m sloot and view the world through my own perspective, incapable as I am of looking at the BS men face nowadays with feminism. I live in my own fantasy land because acknowledging the truth that my sloothood has destroyed my value as a lady is too painful. I wish I could go back but since I cannot I must wholeheartedly support the movement to rationalize my own demise.

[DirtNastyBaby]

I wouldn't say it messed all of them up but it's definetly harder to find wife material in the USA than it is in another country. Women here don't expect to one day be committed to somebody.

[shawntoronto]

Summary:

I"m sloot and view the world through my own perspective, incapable as I am of looking at the BS men face nowadays with feminism. I live in my own fantasy land because acknowledging the truth that my sloothood has destroyed my value as a lady is too painful. I wish I could go back but since I cannot I must wholeheartedly support the movement to rationalize my own demise.

fuark strong reply, if i was said sloot id be crying

[icafe]

Getting married is too risky nowadays. women can wipe outhalf olf your financial portfolio and you can be forced to pay alimony for decades. you are also subject to jail time if you cannot pay. it is an incentive for women to divorce so why wouldn't they. its the stupid feminist laws that fk everything up. studies show that less than half of marriages are successful.
good luck with your marriage goals of 2013.

[Koukla88]

Both men and women are poor marriage material. It's disgusting to think my future husband could have had 100s of sexual partners. Both men and women need to get back to basics and this whole modern day sexual revolution/entitlement is gross for both sexes. Hardly anyone has respect or morals these days.

[Souh]

Summary:

I"m sloot and view the world through my own perspective, incapable as I am of looking at the BS men face nowadays with feminism. I live in my own fantasy land because acknowledging the truth that my sloothood has destroyed my value as a lady is too painful. I wish I could go back but since I cannot I must wholeheartedly support the movement to rationalize my own demise.

That poor poor sloot. I lost it when she said "outmoded gender roles" that made me chuckle. Yea it is outmoded to be a good wife, woman, and lady when you are nothing more than a worthless whore.

[krazy33]

I mean I hate feminazi's but not every girl is one. We've just become a culture reliant on self-satisfaction - regardless of whether or not it hurts someone and that encompasses both men and women.

[jro9999]

Summary of necro-thread:

-All "western" women are entitled sloots.

-All men are fit this same definition of "entitled sloots" but somehow deserve 10/10s who will raise their children and do all menial domestic labor while also having a remunerative job.

-Women should be driven enough to have a career, smart enough to have an intelligent conversation, but have absolutely no problem with being demeaned into enacting outmoded gender modes.

-The misc thinks money buys love, and does not consider what a relationship might offer to a person of the opposite sex who is financially independent, although this is apparently ideal.

-Basically a paradox: the average miscer wants a woman who is fully independent--with a developed personality and life-- who will throw it all away to cater to his needs so that they're always dependent.

-The misc still has no idea what feminism is.

My input for the AM: the women worth having are individuals trying to do well in the world, just like you. They don't need or want your money. Being dependent on another person for support is just as abhorrent to them as it is to you. Why would they want to exchange a perfectly independent life for one with you? This seems like an especially obvious question considering the subservience most miscers seem to desire. A woman with those tendencies isn't going to become the woman you want to be with in the first place. All your frustration comes from expecting the traits of a driven, intelligent woman in a subservient package. The world does not work that way.

I think a relationship dynamic where partners serve each other out of real love and affection--and for no other reason-- is ideal. Like most miscers ITT, I have yet to find a partner that is worthy of that. Does that mean that I think all men are horrible? No, but I haven't found one yet who seems worth sacrificing any of my autonomy.

/rustled jimmies post that was longer than I intended and that no one will read

(fuark. let the misc get to me.)

I love how you have to throw in "menial domestic labor" when describing men's jobs, that one line sets the tone quite well and sums up your hypocritical post

Menial - (of work) Not requiring much skill and lacking prestige: "menial factory jobs".

So let me get straight, you're criticizing men on the misc who want to typecast women as "useless sloots" and how we "demand" women to fit into feminine gender roles but its ok for you to typecast men as bumbling idiots?

Also what's demeaning about being a caring and loving wife? You bring up "outmoded gender roles" and how "demeaning" it is to be a genuine and caring person in a relationship. in your post you have no problem demeaning men into uneducated ATM machines working "menial" jobs while also stating elsewhere in your post that you basically haven't met a man whose worthy of being in a relationship with you (aka hypergamy where women marry up in status), but then you turn around and try to discredit the men in this thread by saying its wrong for men to demean women?? and somehow we're all clueless and inept retards who aren't smart enough to understand feminism?

Get over yourself

[TotalGymFreak]

I love how you have to throw in "menial domestic labor" when describing men's jobs, that one line sets the tone quite well and sums up your hypocritical post

Menial - (of work) Not requiring much skill and lacking prestige: "menial factory jobs".

So let me get straight, you're criticizing men on the misc who want to typecast women as "useless sloots" and how we "demand" women to fit into feminine gender roles but its ok for you to typecast men as bumbling idiots?

Also what's demeaning about being a caring and loving wife? You bring up "outmoded gender roles" and how "demeaning" it is to be a genuine and caring person in a relationship. in your post you have no problem demeaning men into uneducated ATM machines working "menial" jobs while also stating elsewhere in your post that you basically haven't met a man whose worthy of being in a relationship with you (aka hypergamy where women marry up in status), but then you turn around and try to discredit the men in this thread by saying its wrong for men to demean women?? and somehow we're all clueless and inept retards who aren't smart enough to understand feminism?

Get over yourself

[conceptions]

Summary:

I"m sloot and view the world through my own perspective, incapable as I am of looking at the BS men face nowadays with feminism. I live in my own fantasy land because acknowledging the truth that my sloothood has destroyed my value as a lady is too painful. I wish I could go back but since I cannot I must wholeheartedly support the movement to rationalize my own demise.

I love how you have to throw in "menial domestic labor" when describing men's jobs, that one line sets the tone quite well and sums up your hypocritical post

Menial - (of work) Not requiring much skill and lacking prestige: "menial factory jobs".

So let me get straight, you're criticizing men on the misc who want to typecast women as "useless sloots" and how we "demand" women to fit into feminine gender roles but its ok for you to typecast men as bumbling idiots?

Also what's demeaning about being a caring and loving wife? You bring up "outmoded gender roles" and how "demeaning" it is to be a genuine and caring person in a relationship. in your post you have no problem demeaning men into uneducated ATM machines working "menial" jobs while also stating elsewhere in your post that you basically haven't met a man whose worthy of being in a relationship with you (aka hypergamy where women marry up in status), but then you turn around and try to discredit the men in this thread by saying its wrong for men to demean women?? and somehow we're all clueless and inept retards who aren't smart enough to understand feminism?

Get over yourself

Strong reading comprehension.


not srs


God, you guys just prove my point.

[swoletoke]

When we gave these whores the right to vote thats when it started going down hill.
Especially with the rise of this pathetic, moronic idea called feminism.
These whores need to realize the man will always be above them.
Nothing they can or will ever do will change this Fact.

[Softworn]

Strong reading comprehension.


not srs


God, you guys just prove my point.

Keep rustlin', cuz.

[BRBposting]

Summary of necro-thread:

-All "western" women are entitled sloots.

-All men are fit this same definition of "entitled sloots" but somehow deserve 10/10s who will raise their children and do all menial domestic labor while also having a remunerative job.

-Women should be driven enough to have a career, smart enough to have an intelligent conversation, but have absolutely no problem with being demeaned into enacting outmoded gender modes.

-The misc thinks money buys love, and does not consider what a relationship might offer to a person of the opposite sex who is financially independent, although this is apparently ideal.

-Basically a paradox: the average miscer wants a woman who is fully independent--with a developed personality and life-- who will throw it all away to cater to his needs so that they're always dependent.

-The misc still has no idea what feminism is.

My input for the AM: the women worth having are individuals trying to do well in the world, just like you. They don't need or want your money. Being dependent on another person for support is just as abhorrent to them as it is to you. Why would they want to exchange a perfectly independent life for one with you? This seems like an especially obvious question considering the subservience most miscers seem to desire. A woman with those tendencies isn't going to become the woman you want to be with in the first place. All your frustration comes from expecting the traits of a driven, intelligent woman in a subservient package. The world does not work that way.

I think a relationship dynamic where partners serve each other out of real love and affection--and for no other reason-- is ideal. Like most miscers ITT, I have yet to find a partner that is worthy of that. Does that mean that I think all men are horrible? No, but I haven't found one yet who seems worth sacrificing any of my autonomy.

/rustled jimmies post that was longer than I intended and that no one will read

(fuark. let the misc get to me.)

Account Age: 4 Months
Posts: 885
Rep Power: 5013
Gender: Female

[Starred]

Very broadly: yes

edit: but I wouldn't really place much of the blame on feminism in itself

[BigSteak87]

Western Culture in general.

[NotANun21]

All women are like American women inside, it's just that American women and Americans in general are very vocal about their opinions.

[TheCore84]

all it takes is 5 minutes on any social networking site to see how easy women have it, and thus how entitled they have become

Brb girl with 2000+ friends on ******** makes status complaining about relationship
Brb instantly receives attention from ~50 different guys telling her how pretty she is and how awesome she is and how they'll always be there for her

one click of a mouse, one picture on instagram, one tweet, one status update, etc and they have dozens of men drooling over them

It's pathetic, and the worst part is that kids growing nowadays think its normal

A lot of sense was made that day.

[BigBearBrah]

The best women are European women that live here. My GF is Russian and she's amazing.

[kel_varnsen]

just anecdotal, but having lived one year in the us, most of my life in scandinavia and visited several other countries, i'd say without a doubt american girls are the worst. ugly, fat, loud and a huge sense of entitlement. did i mention fat!

[socrates07]

what pisses me off the most is that women here believe they are entitled to men out of their league

heck if you are a 9, you deserve a handsome man but if you are a filthy 5, not a chance!

This

It has gotten to the point where I don't even try with chicks anymore. It's just not worth it, as sad as that sounds.. it's just the way it is.

These chicks need to come the fuk down to earth before I give a rats ass about them again. Until then fuk em', let them hit their 30s and bawl their eyes out about how things have turned out and see if I give a flying fuk

doin me