they arent all bad bro..trust me
its just that alot of people simply settle for either the prettiest dumb bimbo or whatever they can get instead of really taking their time and being paitent with this ish and paying attention to the little things that mean a huge deal like someones values and beliefs
|
-
08-30-2012, 02:07 AM #61
-
08-30-2012, 02:08 AM #62
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
- Posts: 9,720
- Rep Power: 42719
If a girl ever breaks up with you, no matter how long you've been together- the only appropriate response is, "Ok."
No yelling. No begging. No caring. Just say it's cool and move on. A) This is the way you should be anyway B) Bitches be trippin when you give them zero reaction to anything
And remember: Don't let yourself get attached to anything you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you feel the heat around the corner.
Los Angeles Crew
Computer Science crew
BMW crew
-
08-30-2012, 02:19 AM #63
-
08-30-2012, 02:28 AM #64
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 10,813
- Rep Power: 2746
Ayone who has spent time around women should have observed this behaviour. Look at guys you know who got cheated on or girls you know who cheated on their boyfriends, you can be sure that the guy who got cheated on was someone who could be described as a *nice guy* and would probably make a good Dad. If a woman sees a man as being weak then it's in her nature to find a stronger male to sleep with, they're ****ing compelled to do it by nature.
It's not that all women cheat, but all women will cheat on a weak man in the right circumstances. I witnessed a girl I used to be good friends with cheat on her boyfriend, she's a decent girl and felt really bad about it but it wasn't really surprising because the guy was a joke, me and her used to take the piss out of him after the relationship, her respect for him was non-existant.
I disagree, you can do and be all those things but if you let your woman walk all over you, your relationship will ultimately fail.
Also you can be and do none of those things, but if you act like a boss and don't take any **** your girlfriend will always be head over heels in love with you.PC Master Race
Misc from work crew
245/330/445.5 (440DL@161BW) B/S/DL but do I even lift? No, I do not lift.
-
-
08-30-2012, 02:33 AM #65
-
08-30-2012, 02:37 AM #66
-
08-30-2012, 02:42 AM #67
-
08-30-2012, 02:42 AM #68
-
-
08-30-2012, 02:47 AM #69
-
08-30-2012, 02:47 AM #70
-
08-30-2012, 03:04 AM #71
-
08-30-2012, 03:04 AM #72
Well, the law of averages (again, not a real statistical law, but a bias) is about a persons BELIEVE that things even out / will eventually average. Which is not THAT wrong in very specific experiments, people usually think about the fair coin flip.
BUT even with the fair coin flip (as in: the coin is not "loaded", so it favors one side), the average only is established in a very long (or infinite) series of flips. Whats breaks this "law" is:
- most events are not as (artificially) fair as a coin flip, we usually have its slightly skewed in favor of one outcome ("normal distribution" is mostly scientific and not related to real events)
- most events are registered short-term, we don't give in a long-term / infinite series type of world or perception
This means you date 4 girls consecutively and all turn out to be sluts. The law of averages would then make you believe that the 5th girl SURELY would have to be a good girl, because "on average" the good and bad would even out, right? And thats basically where people fall into this trap/bias.
Keep in mind statistics uses VERY simple experiments for this (doesn't get much simpler than a coin flip, right?), and the social dynamics between people, especially in dating/mating is probably one of the most complex processes I can think of. So any attempt to break down this very complex process with simple tools like statistics or the crap that was posted in OP is bound to fail or to disregard multiple factors that play a vital role.
EPICBULGARIAN91 already brought up one factor: people stop doing what they did for themselves as singles, once they are in a partnership, so they THEMSELVES changes the rules of the game and wonder why the same person that fell in love with them may cheat on them or fall out of love with the new person they became once they stopped being single.
But its simple minds that look for simple answers, so ... I forgive OP.
-
-
08-30-2012, 03:32 AM #73
bs
Anyone can write blah blah around in circles using big words to sound smart and people automatically believe the bs.
Where does the author get his research/stats from? This is like saying men can not settle down because they need to "spread their seed"
Some women and men cheat, but not all. I think the ones that do lack morals and self esteem. You can't live your life paranoid of what might happen. Be yourself the best you can, fall in love and if you get stabbed in the back, oh well that's life.++ Positive Crew ++
***Canadian Crew***
-
08-30-2012, 03:35 AM #74
Nice article but some ideas seem a bit wishy washy e.g. why are the good dad genes still in existence? (maybe because they are still producing children but not at the same rate, or maybe it is not genetically derived but rather socially derived as a result of not getting short-term action i.e. their horniness makes them go to greater extents for the prospect of action after continual rejection). Also it seems that a women might be causing greater risk to a child's future by cheating on a husband and ruining a stable relationship than by marrying and phucking someone who is socially stable but with chit genetics.
Also I think its too simplistic to state that men only want to get their dicks wet, even on the misc we have guys wanting to phuck tall bishes to pass on alpha genes.
The good genes, good dad thing does make some sense though. An obstetrician was telling me of some study they conducted where something like 15% of dads were actually the genetic fathers of the children their partners were giving birth to (srs).
also I remembering hearing about a study where sloots who cheated were actually more satisfied with life. Apparently it enhances their self worth when they are able to deceive their partners.Last edited by drekkage; 08-30-2012 at 03:45 AM.
-
08-30-2012, 03:45 AM #75
-
08-30-2012, 04:26 AM #76
-
-
08-30-2012, 04:28 AM #77
-
08-30-2012, 04:48 AM #78
-
08-30-2012, 08:01 AM #79
-
08-30-2012, 08:10 AM #80
-
-
08-30-2012, 08:14 AM #81
Cliffs: Look good and be the "alpha male" Aka don't look like a slob, stay in shape and have the best genes, then have some money to back you up.
Confidence, money, good genes and looks = winSTEAM: rangetsu1 | SC: jonnyboiiir | IG: jonnyreyes12
misc #2 assman ω. keep hustlin' cuzz *Wrestling family crew*
-
08-30-2012, 08:37 AM #82
-
08-30-2012, 08:59 AM #83
This is why you black knight, then white knight
Repeat
???
Profit☆☆☆υк ¢яєω☆☆☆
60% of the time, I get you back every time
Your fear is simply because you are not living with life. You are living in your mind. Your fear is always about what's going to happen next. That means your fear is always about that which does not exist. If your fear is about the nonexistent, your fear is 100% imaginary. If you are suffering the non-existential, we call that insanity. If you are rooted in reality, there would be no fear.
-
08-30-2012, 11:20 AM #84
his argument seems to be rationalized from evolutionary perspective using knowledge of physiology to back up his claims. From an evolutionary perspective it is not completely explained i.e. how would potentially destroying a marriage by cheating help survival of an offspring? I guess the answer to this depends on how often women get caught cheating and whether they are forgiven.
However, how people act in social situations today may not reflect the way we would have acted thousands of years ago due to social differences. Trying to rationalize current human behavior by our genetics is therefore limited.
His physiological rationalizations of behavior seem extremely simplistic e.g. our purpose is to spread our seed as we have higher levels of testosterone. Brb ignoring the effects of testosterone on body composition and whether women are more sensitive to its effects behaviourally (I think they are).
That being said if you can't provide any evidence that his good dad vs good gene therapy is invalid then at least you should consider it or find a way to invalidate it. While he hasn't provided any real evidence to back his beliefs and doesn't connect all the dots that doesn't mean that you can't find evidence that negate his assertions. I guess you just have to find potential holes like the ones I identified above and find if the evidence conflicts with his assertions. I have read that women cheating within relationships is pretty common and that it provides women with emotional satisfaction. When I'm not busy maybe I'll try find the studies.Last edited by drekkage; 08-30-2012 at 11:29 AM.
-
-
08-30-2012, 01:03 PM #85
Contrary to misc belief not all women cheat. Either way if you are dating a cheater they will always have a reason to cheat on you. There will always be someone more aesthetic and more rich than you. A relationship is not lovey dovey all the time especially after a couple of years and when times get tough, that person will cheat on you for sure (grass is always greener on the other side).
++ Positive Crew ++
***Canadian Crew***
-
08-30-2012, 01:11 PM #86
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Massachusetts, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 9,326
- Rep Power: 4898
women and men cheat because we are not biologically meant to be faithful. This whole relationship **** is a societies creation. We were meant to walk around, rape a bitch, and leave.
“Foolish and wretched is the man who builds his happiness on the frail and unstable affection of a woman.”
"Wisdom is the daughter of experience" - Leonardo da Vinci
-
08-30-2012, 01:11 PM #87
-
08-30-2012, 01:18 PM #88
-
-
08-30-2012, 01:18 PM #89
-
08-30-2012, 01:24 PM #90
Bookmarks