3 sets leg press
3 sets leg curl
2 sets chest press
2 sets incline chest press
2 sets seated row
2 sets lateral pulldown
2 sets lateral raise
3 sets Calf raise
2 sets biceps curl
2 sets triceps pushdown
3x a week with 30 minutes cardio afterwards.
Do I need to change things or is this allright? I will be doing this for the next 6 months, than hop to a split-day scheme.
Cutting, Goal is to reach 180 Lbs.[295 atm].
Edit: I'm not trying to get "bigger" with this scheme, it's to keep the muscles for 6 months, since im going to cut I don't want them to break down.
|
-
08-20-2012, 11:20 AM #1
Is this a good full-body workout?
Last edited by Forzas; 08-20-2012 at 12:00 PM.
-
08-20-2012, 12:45 PM #2
-
08-20-2012, 12:52 PM #3
-
08-20-2012, 01:07 PM #4
I would do something more like this;
3 sets leg press
3 sets bench press
3 sets leg curl
3 sets leg extension
3 sets row
3 sets overhead press
2 sets Calf raise
3 sets biceps curl
Hyperextensions
Abs
You want to keep it simple at the beginner level; if you did barbell you could simplify even more - look at All Pro in the stickies.
-
-
08-20-2012, 01:09 PM #5
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 55
- Posts: 2,132
- Rep Power: 2584
Got to be perfectly honest: it sucks.
You should be looking at more compound movements rather than isolation work. Deadlifts, squats and OHP need to be included.
If you're a newb to lifting and carrying high BFP, there's also no reason why you won't necessarily add muscle rather than just "maintain" what you've got.
-
08-20-2012, 01:31 PM #6
-
08-20-2012, 01:36 PM #7
-
08-20-2012, 01:52 PM #8
I don't agree, there is nothing magical about barbell - yes they simplify things, but the mostly machine workout I posted would do the same thing. Its up to him if he wants to do calves and biceps now - I agree those are optional; but I see nothing wrong with getting started early though, even All Pro has bicep curls and calves - rows aint going to build biceps like curls.
Also barbell squatting at 300 lbs may not even be possible for him.
-
-
08-20-2012, 02:00 PM #9
-
08-20-2012, 02:02 PM #10
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 55
- Posts: 2,132
- Rep Power: 2584
No it won't.
There's more range of movement with a barbell and even more with a dumbell.
Calves and biceps are a waste of time. There's nothing wrong with doing them except that he'll be wasting his time and would get better results using compounds.Wanna bet that compounds won't build those biceps just as well as curls? Perhaps not in an established lifter, but with a newb? You'd lose.
As for squatting 300lbs? Who suggested that? I didn't. Getting started, there's nothing wrong with squatting with an empty bar. But that aside, both SS and AllPro have recommendations on what a beginner should start squatting with.
-
08-20-2012, 02:04 PM #11
-
08-20-2012, 02:05 PM #12
-
-
08-20-2012, 02:12 PM #13
-
08-20-2012, 02:18 PM #14
What do you think the difference is between a hack squat machine and barbell squat? As I said the only argument I get from people like you is: Core, CNS, Knee Ligaments - core can be worked with abs, hyperextension - knee ligaments and CNS don't matter to me personally but CNS is getting some work from a hack squat machine as weight is on your shoulders. Can't think of anything else "magical" that a barbell would do.
About the only people that I would say should or have to do free weight squats would be an athlete.
-
08-20-2012, 02:19 PM #15
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 55
- Posts: 2,132
- Rep Power: 2584
Let me repeat: A squat will hit more muscles than any other lift - including leg presses. For a start, there's far less need to stabilise with leg pressing than there is with squatting. You have 14 sets of leg exercises which can all be taken care of with 3 or 4 sets of squats. That will give time to spend on other areas. Not only that, but the squats are hitting abs and lower back as well.
By all means, leg press. But not at the expense of dropping squats.
-
08-20-2012, 02:28 PM #16
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 55
- Posts: 2,132
- Rep Power: 2584
It should do. Stimulating the CNS is how you build muscle!!
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/planet43.htm
-
-
08-20-2012, 02:30 PM #17
No barbell squats:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctYNk-UF1B4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pChGMOVQ1Lk
No barbell squats:
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/stev...g-program.html
I spent 99% of my life never doing a barbell back squat and I got to a lean 200 previously; they are completely and easily replaceable IMO. That said I do them right now; why? For simplicity.
-
08-20-2012, 02:30 PM #18
-
08-20-2012, 02:33 PM #19
-
08-20-2012, 02:41 PM #20
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 55
- Posts: 2,132
- Rep Power: 2584
LOL @ using Yates as an example. Dude is juiced to phuck. You comparing yourself to him? ROFLMAO.
He's also a rarity - the vast majority of pros do squat. Finding one example doesn't make your statement correct.
Anything is replaceable. But easily? You're talking complete and utter crap. Your own post up there has 14 sets to replace them with. You call that easily replaceable?
BTW. Love the bro-science plan you posted there. 7 meals a day? Good, "clean" food. Yeah... right. Welcome to the 1960s.
Tell me dude, what colour is the sky on your planet?
-
-
08-20-2012, 02:48 PM #21
Blood and Guts is a workout program he built for everyone - conceivably for non-juicers too? Its sad thats what you say faced with a quality workout program that doesn't include barbell squats though; your like an athiest denying god or some other fanatic who refuses to accept what your seeing with your own eyes; all you can do is blame it on steroids - its those damn steroids! thats why their program works, thats it.
Squats don't work calves for crap; so I posted 9 sets to replace 3 sets of squats, but its not a direct replacement; my 9 sets would build much bigger legs, you would probably have to do more like 4-5 sets of squats to match that. As far as easiness - I would take 9 sets of those machines any day over even 3 sets of barbell squat... But what does it matter? Fact is squats can be replaced Yates showed it, Steve Cook showed it - who claims to be natural.
I didn't post a meal plan, your confused.Last edited by steyrsp; 08-20-2012 at 02:55 PM.
-
08-20-2012, 03:00 PM #22
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 55
- Posts: 2,132
- Rep Power: 2584
In a newb they would grow just from walking the bar from the rack, but I never claimed that he should just squat for calves. That's why I'd also recommended deadlifts. But it's irrelevant. At such an early stage, a 300lb guy doesn't need to worry about calf isolation.
And yes, you did post a meal plan. Check your links again. It shows how knowlegeable you are on the subject when you don't even read the crap you post. And are you recommending that the OP takes on Yate's program? If not, it has absolutley no relevance whatsoever either. If yes, then you're even more deluded than I thought.
I would take 9 sets of those machines any day over even 3 sets of barbell squat...
-
08-20-2012, 03:08 PM #23
-
08-20-2012, 03:12 PM #24
I tried doing deadlifts and squads once, I coulnt walk after it, I do know that it feels better/more efficenter than doing leg presses.. But i'm going to do the body workout 3x a week, wouln't doing Deadlifts and Squats be a huge pain in the legs(if I do it 3x/week) since i'm also going to do cardio after each body workout?
thanks for the replies guys.
Edit; I don't use machines to do all my workouts, I only use it for Row pull, legg presses(with weights not the machinery one) and for leg curls, for the rest I do mine arms, shoulders with dumbells.
-
-
08-20-2012, 03:13 PM #25
Well, I don't have all day to do this stuff, but its funner than working so here ya go:
Monday 100%
Wednesday 90% weight
Friday 80% weight
3x8 sets leg press
3x8 sets bench press
3x8 sets leg curl
3x8 sets leg extension
3x8 sets row
3x8 sets overhead press
3x15-failure sets Calf raise
3x8 sets biceps curl
2x15-failure Hyperextensions
2x25-failure Abs
Add weight as you can on Mondays.
Move to intermediate program around 1.25-1.5 lean bodyweight x 1RM bench
Warmup 5-10 minutes walking; 1 set 25% weight, sets 2 & 3 working weight.
-
08-20-2012, 03:26 PM #26
If you can do your 5-12 reps (whatever you choose) on Squats with good form, then you can do them 3x a week - unless you have any medical issues. But your squatting maybe 100 extra pounds of bodyweight plus the bar, so just not sure if it will work for you; but like I said 3x a week is not too much if you can do it with good form, the soreness will go away after a week or two.
-
08-20-2012, 11:34 PM #27
-
08-21-2012, 12:20 AM #28
-
-
08-21-2012, 12:43 AM #29
-
08-21-2012, 12:47 AM #30
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Location: Gothenburg, State / Province, Sweden
- Age: 64
- Posts: 5,966
- Rep Power: 2431
Dorian Yates stated also that he suffered from injuries otherwise ( shoulders) because he wasn't aware of certain risks. But he is the first and only pro I heard saying squats best left for noob or atheles. EVERYONE else says otherwise. I will do that. It was the squatting and deadlifting besides the benchies and OHP:s that gave me the boost when I left newbie machines. With a proper form you wont go wrong . Legpresses, leg curls and leg extensions I still do to complement a good leg day. But squats will propably be the last excersise I will abandon if I had my choice..
Similar Threads
-
Is this an alright full leg workout?
By ShomerShabbos in forum ExercisesReplies: 10Last Post: 08-13-2012, 11:23 PM -
Is this a good mass building workout?
By 2oKingJameso9 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 2Last Post: 03-15-2010, 04:45 PM -
IS this a good plan?
By lanceginger in forum SupplementsReplies: 4Last Post: 03-22-2009, 07:24 PM -
is this a good full leg workout?
By shadowspar in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 5Last Post: 07-23-2008, 02:51 PM -
Is this a good workout?
By MStone in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 7Last Post: 08-02-2005, 01:26 PM
Bookmarks