Just read The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

[brahG]

from now on im ignoring/negging (depends on their rep power) every religious miscer.

athieists are the master race.


but it was a good book

[brahG]

Its a good book. God bless Dawkins

[Venged]

from now on im ignoring/negging (depends on their rep power) every religious miscer.

athieists are the master race

But you can't prove god doesn't exist









































































srs

[Meconium]

I laughed, I cried, I proceeded to drink turpentine.

[Hinterseer]

Will read on vacation over the next couple of weeks. Is it that good?

But you can't prove god doesn't exist


srs

Dat burden of truth. You can't prove Santa doesn't exist and so on.

[brahG]

But you can't prove god doesn't exist















srs

you can't prove something that doesn't exist

[MisterAngry]

But you can't prove god doesn't exist


srs

and you can't prove he does, essentially the balls in the religious folks court, surely science hasn't got to go around disproving every fairy individually, when there's no evidence to support it exists in the first place?

brb make up a creature called miscosaurus, holy sh!t its real guy's science can't disprove it, ITS REAL

[Slow_Ninja]

fukk you commie

jesus bats for america so there

[BrosefMengele]

Tempted to neg OP.

No, I'm not religious. But it's equally ignorant to say with such conviction that a "god" can't exist.

[brahG]

Will read on vacation over the next couple of weeks. Is it that good?

The OP isn't serious. it's definitey worth the time imho

[Dreyth]

it does a good job of destroying the Christain faith, that's for sure.

Not sure about Islam though.

[rapewhistles]

just think for urself brah, dont hate on someone for having a different opinion than u

but yes good book

[wesbender]

Tempted to neg OP.

No, I'm not religious. But it's equally ignorant to say with such conviction that a "god" can't exist.

tempted to neg you for lack of reading comprehension.

nobody said that a god can't exist.

[brahG]

Tempted to neg OP.

No, I'm not religious. But it's equally ignorant to say with such conviction that a "god" can't exist.

god bless you

[Muneyy]

Go over to reddit, you'll fit right in.

[IawI]

Tempted to neg OP.

No, I'm not religious. But it's equally ignorant to say with such conviction that a "god" can't exist.

A personal god offered by religion can not exist, and I say that with 100% conviction.

[Meconium]

Will read on vacation over the next couple of weeks. Is it that good?

No in my honest opinion. Dawkins always comes off condescending with a smug sense of superiority when discussing such matters. And whats in it is nothing new that the slabs of anti-religious propaganda you are bombarded with on a daily from YouTube or Reddit havent already said.

Nietzsche not only beat these people to the punchline, but he also proposed other philosophies to replace it and was just a far superior writer to Dawkins.

Unless your a science**** who has a picture of Carl Sagan in his room, you shouldn't waste your time.

[Hinterseer]

Tempted to neg OP.

No, I'm not religious. But it's equally ignorant to say with such conviction that a "god" can't exist.

Not really.

[brahG]

it does a good job of destroying the Christain faith, that's for sure.

Not sure about Islam though.

This. It's sad he only attacked Christianity.

[DrHughMyronBro]

[Dude069]

lol dawkins is a butthurt *******, he can suck my nutsack. I'm not even religious.

[BigBraddah]

atheist brah checking in. I haven't read the book, but an old room mate of mine did and recommended it highly as well.

[SuburbanLegend]

shut up and go back to r/atheism. Your ilk is just as bad as the religious nuts. hurr durr, I read a book and now I'm better than everyone else.

[ABurger]

jakes on you OP, "god" is someone we believe to be our creator but in reality they are just a higher spiritually developed being, we are on level 1, while jesus christ could be said to be on level 6 or 7. or maybe what im saying makes no sense, but w,e dawg

[Dude069]

shut up and go back to r/atheism. Your ilk is just as bad as the religious nuts. hurr durr, I read a book and now I'm better than everyone else.

yeah and this

[d0wnfall]

Dawkings is a *******, so are you. There are more than enough rebuttals about his chit book on youtube. look it up.

[AnasRhammer]

sup jesus *******s umad the bible is an old fairytale?

[Hinterseer]

No in my honest opinion. Dawkins always comes off condescending with a smug sense of superiority when discussing such matters. And whats in it is nothing new that the slabs of anti-religious propaganda you are bombarded with on a daily from YouTube or Reddit havent already said.

Nietzsche not only beat these people to the punchline, but he also proposed other philosophies to replace it and was just a far superior writer to Dawkins.

Unless your a science**** who has a picture of Carl Sagan in his room, you shouldn't waste your time.

Have been on r/atheism a few times, did not find anything remotely funny or interesting. Dawkins sure does come off as condescending, but can you blame him? Some of the people he argues with are just borderline retarded.

So the book is basically anti-religious propaganda? willread/10

[ThaWhistle]

No in my honest opinion. Dawkins always comes off condescending with a smug sense of superiority when discussing such matters. And whats in it is nothing new that the slabs of anti-religious propaganda you are bombarded with on a daily from YouTube or Reddit havent already said.

Nietzsche not only beat these people to the punchline, but he also proposed other philosophies to replace it and was just a far superior writer to Dawkins.

Unless your a science**** who has a picture of Carl Sagan in his room, you shouldn't waste your time.

this. dawkins doesn't know how to make a point without a supremely ironic holier-than-thou tone behind his writing. Which is a shame really.

[brahG]

i wasnt being srs in the OP lol

edited